gbollard wrote:
The main difference that Stephen King had with Stanley Kubrick was that Kubrick didn't believe in the supernatural and decided to make the entire thing "inside people's heads" while Stephen King's take was that the Overlook hotel was posessed and was trying to get Danny (but via his father?).
Okay, I see that. But at least in the TV version of King's "It", the character "It" is at one point narrated to be a metaphore for harmful human indifference. (I doubt that part differs from the book, however superior to the film it is.) So, the film seemed to be saying that we all created "It" out of our antipathies. Yes, "It" is represented as a physical creature, but the "It" metaphore is far more thought-provoking than the creature, who itself teaches us virtually nothing, so I'd wonder if the metaphore wasn't the whole point of the story.