Titanic 3D

Post Reply New Topic

Did anyone go see this movie? What did you think of it?

I didn't see anything different really because nothing was added to it. I could watch the movie without the glasses but I kept them on anyway but I kept taking them off to see the difference. I am going to stick with the movie at home.

I want to go see this movie only because it is in 3D.

I don't like 3d films, I see that film in 2d thanks
James Cameron is only cashing on the centenary commemorations of the RMS Titanic, my home town of Liverpool is putting on a few commemorations and most of then are free of charge, no need to waste my money seeing that film in 3d now!

I don't see the point in these movies when nothing has been added but the 3D effect. Seems to be a recent method by movie studios to make box office money twice over for the same movie. Phantom Menace and The Lion King are 2 other recent one's that come to mind. Sadly 3D has become a gimmick for me as most new movies have a 3D alternative, which in most cases is poor uses of it.

I went to see Titanic in 3D last Thursday with a friend. Like League_Girl said, I took the glasses off at various points to see if I could spot any difference (which I hardly could), especially since this was my first time seeing a movie in theaters in 3D. Also, the 3D didn't seem to add much to the movie. Still, it was an enjoyable movie experience for me.

I have no desire to see it, especially in 3D. The glasses giving me headaches is bad enough, but to have them on for a film that's over 3 HOURS?!? No thank you! I don't care if it was LOTR in 3D and not Titanic, 3 hours is WAY too long to endure a 3D film.

And all of that's before my personal feelings toward Titanic is taken into account. Basically, it was like dangling keys in front of a baby: pointless, overrated entertainment with good visuals and a very narrow demographic appeal.

Did they convert the 2D acting and writing to 3D, or just the visuals?

the 3d version is not very good i think,i like the 2d