trollcatman wrote:
pawelk1986 wrote:
trollcatman wrote:
I don't think a new series in the old timeline will be made. If they ever make a new series, wouldn't they set them in the new rebooted Star Trek from the films?
Why not old timeline?
The past Star Trek films were always about one of the existing series. First they create the series, and later they made some films with the same crew. Now they are just making films and did not make a new series out of it.
Which will be difficult to do now, because making a film with the new Kirk crew would mean all those actors need to sign up for the next 5-7 years or so. I don't think there will be any series in the near future, maybe forever. There have been Star Trek series running from 1987 - 2005 and nothing since then.
]
Not necessarily.
They could make a series involving minor or supporting characters who appear in the new films. Those actors are more likely to sign on for something like that, as opposed to in-demand actors like Zachary Quinto or Zoe Saldana. It would need to have great writing in order to win our hearts the way Uhura, Kirk, and Spock have, and to me that would be the real challenge. I think there is a stigma to genre writing for television, and a lot of the best writers don't want to go near it for fear of limiting their prospects. Even if they assembled a great crew of writers, getting them to stick around for more than two or three seasons would be a challenge, because when a series gets popular, so often other projects try to poach them or lure them off to something else. There are so many great shows that fall off after four or five seasons because the writers disappear, and even with much or all of the same cast, it isn't the same show.