Jakki wrote:
That was fun,,,what was the idea behind that one?
I think the idea behind this one is that sometimes there are just more common sense ways to approach
any situation.
Bureaucracy can slow things can down, akin to bringing a sword to a gunfight, when comparing systems of bureaucracy to (clean) capitalism.
For example, imagine if a person has to pay a £2,500 fee for an Autism diagnosis in a capitalist healthcare insurance system, where they have all the evidence to receive a particular healthcare diagnosis, by someone who knows what they are doing? They can then get disability benefits more easily and start working towards receiving monetary aid immediately.
If it takes years on a bureaucratic healthcare system to receive proper healthcare & a relevant diagnosis, such as an Autism diagnosis, then you could lose out on a lot more than £2,500. Which would make the excessive cost worth the high-standard care, versus rationed, socialist healthcare.
I think ideally socialist healthcare would be of high-standard. But it really isn't in the United Kingdom for neurological disorders. it is awful, in fact.
It is improving, but there is still a long way to go....