Sorry. My fault. I'll clean up the coffee. May I point out that Mrs Deirdre Manners is very firm on the subject of snorting coffe out of your nose being unladylike? Not saying that that there is more than circumstantial evidence of it getting onto the muffins by that route. Just speculating. You know, like a jury does:
Jury to judge wrote:
Can a juror come to a verdict based on a reason that was not presented in court and has no facts or evidence to support it, either from the prosecution or defence?
(From
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/feb/20/vicky-pryce-trial-10-questions)
Do you find it reassuring that the judge said no?
The
Daily Mail, that bastion of journalistic integrity (in the spirit of "Fair and Balanced" just in case you are unfamiliar with that most august publication), the arbiter of good taste and paragon of restraint (note all the examples of such on the right) provides you with the following, eminently pertinent information:
Daily Mail wrote:
Of the eight women and four men on the Vicky Pryce jury, only two were white - the rest appeared to be of Afro-Caribbean or Asian origin. ...
It was noted during the Pryce case that many of the jurors were dressed casually, and none of the men wore shirt and tie.
The horror! The horror! Don't they know that the male brain only works properly when blood flow is carefully regulated through a tie? Without a tie, what's to prevent it from overheating? And imagine all the cost to the taxpayer of all that wasted effort of the court officials. They could have spent that money hanging people!
(Why did I read the Daily Mail? I heard of their justified concerns on the BBC, and wanted to mainline the motherlode of wisdom, unadulterated by the liberal media.)