Post a Picture of the Real You.
^^^Good question.
I have never liked pictures of myself even when I was a child. I did not look (in the pictures) the way I felt. If those pictures were me, then yuck!
The obvious psych explanation would be that I am only a shadow of myself. But I think that is too simplistic.
I think shadow pictures allow me to fill in who I am, and not just the outside part. All of them are outdoors so I also think shadow pictures are always showing me in the sun and connected to the natural world, which for me, is a better perspective.
_________________
The river is the melody
And sky is the refrain - Gordon Lightfoot
auntblabby
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,760
Location: the island of defective toy santas
Good point. Thanks AB. Also, the few photos I have of me that I like the best are a couple from when I was a very small child and later as an adult, but they are from the back or side and you can't really see my face. I never really thought about it that much before. Thanks!
_________________
The river is the melody
And sky is the refrain - Gordon Lightfoot
I've not read any Anne at all, and I can't remember ever seeing her in any of my favourite bookstores - though I probably wouldn't have noticed anyway.
I'll let you - and anybody else who cares - know what I think once I've reread WT. I have to admit that my first reading (2013, I'd say - I was SEVENTEEN) was a largely cursory and unsatisfactory reading. I had a habit of reading classics in this fashion back then, wanting to dispatch them as quickly as possible so that I could claim the intellectual "bragging rights" of having read them, but with a minimum of pain. I now see that this attitude was thoroughly wrong and am having to reread many of the titles from that time. I just hope I can get away with not having to reread Moby Dick, which genuinely was TORTURE.
Off topic, but have you read Crime and Punishment, and if so, what did you think of it? I enjoyed it very much.
I have read it, and consider it one of his weaker novels - as he did himself - although I love everything he wrote. Being hyper-empathetic, I have a hard time hearing about graphic acts of violence; this is a problem I have with all of his major four novels, Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, The Brothers Karamazov and House of the Dead, insofar as they all contain unnecessarily explicit descriptions of violent acts.
I love the theme of Christian redemption at the end of the novel, and the idea that even as depraved a character as Raskolnikov can be redeemed by the Christian power of love. I do think this theme was summed up better and more maturely in Brothers Karamazov and even House of the Dead, however. Dostoyevsky considered The Idiot his best novel, and Prince Myshkin his surrogate son. I think if he had lived a little longer, however, he'd have concluded - rightly - that Brothers Karamazov was his best work. Alyosha, the hero, was actually named after his biological son, who died in infancy (I can't remember whether before or after The Idiot).
Dostoyevsky's view that our humanity is all that matters, is all that is capable of redeeming the endless suffering of our "being-in-the-world-as-such", as existentialists would call it, is I think the Alpha and Omega of his philosophy, and there are passages in Crime and Punishment which convey this very movingly. Just don't, whatever you do, view it as a detective story or a voyeuristic "slasher" type story. It is, apart from its quintessentially Russian morbid obsession with pain and violence, a fundamentally and humbly Christian work, though I don't mean this in too doctrinaire a sense. It's Christian in the sense that it's such a powerful eulogy on the Christian virtues and their power to transform the life of the lost, lonely individual; not to rid him of his suffering, but to allow him to achieve a kind of nobility through it; a kind of joy and despair at the same time. The central theme of Crime and Punishment is best summed up in these words from Brothers Karamazov, written by Dmitri to his brother Alyosha, after the former is convicted (presumably falsely) of patricide and sent to Siberia:
Thank you very much for this. Prometheus. I didn't see this until now. I have Brothers in a vintage limited edition hard cover with it's own dust case and prints from Fritz Eichenberg for the illustrations. I have started it, but life happens and it falls by the wayside.
I definitely didn't see Crime & Punishment as a slasher or detective novel and was focused very intently on Raskolnikov's descent and his realization of understanding the consequence of his actions had in the end.
you tube video can you see the real me the who
Not bad


_________________
Take car. Go to mum's. Kill Phil, grab Liz, go to the Winchester, have a nice cold pint, and wait for all of this to blow over. How's that for a slice of fried gold?
AQ-49 of 50
EQ-7 of 60
RDOS:
Neurodiverse (Aspie) score is 183 of 200.
Neurotypical (Non-autistic) score is 31 of 200
INTJ-T Personality type
Thanks

_________________
Take car. Go to mum's. Kill Phil, grab Liz, go to the Winchester, have a nice cold pint, and wait for all of this to blow over. How's that for a slice of fried gold?
AQ-49 of 50
EQ-7 of 60
RDOS:
Neurodiverse (Aspie) score is 183 of 200.
Neurotypical (Non-autistic) score is 31 of 200
INTJ-T Personality type
I have read it, and consider it one of his weaker novels - as he did himself - although I love everything he wrote. Being hyper-empathetic, I have a hard time hearing about graphic acts of violence; this is a problem I have with all of his major four novels, Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, The Brothers Karamazov and House of the Dead, insofar as they all contain unnecessarily explicit descriptions of violent acts.
I love the theme of Christian redemption at the end of the novel, and the idea that even as depraved a character as Raskolnikov can be redeemed by the Christian power of love. I do think this theme was summed up better and more maturely in Brothers Karamazov and even House of the Dead, however. Dostoyevsky considered The Idiot his best novel, and Prince Myshkin his surrogate son. I think if he had lived a little longer, however, he'd have concluded - rightly - that Brothers Karamazov was his best work. Alyosha, the hero, was actually named after his biological son, who died in infancy (I can't remember whether before or after The Idiot).
Dostoyevsky's view that our humanity is all that matters, is all that is capable of redeeming the endless suffering of our "being-in-the-world-as-such", as existentialists would call it, is I think the Alpha and Omega of his philosophy, and there are passages in Crime and Punishment which convey this very movingly. Just don't, whatever you do, view it as a detective story or a voyeuristic "slasher" type story. It is, apart from its quintessentially Russian morbid obsession with pain and violence, a fundamentally and humbly Christian work, though I don't mean this in too doctrinaire a sense. It's Christian in the sense that it's such a powerful eulogy on the Christian virtues and their power to transform the life of the lost, lonely individual; not to rid him of his suffering, but to allow him to achieve a kind of nobility through it; a kind of joy and despair at the same time. The central theme of Crime and Punishment is best summed up in these words from Brothers Karamazov, written by Dmitri to his brother Alyosha, after the former is convicted (presumably falsely) of patricide and sent to Siberia:
Sorry to derail further, but seeing a discussion about Dostoievsky here is so unusual I can't resist.
Try Demons/The Possessed - he anticipates the horrors of the Bolshevik revolution and the depravity of their methods and goals in uncanny detail and is generally a fascinating, if deeply disturbing book. Given some of your views and how well read you are, I think you would appreciate it.
Also, Joseph Frank wrote an excellent biography where he puts Dostoyevsky's work in context: historical, political and ideological without which I don't think his work can be fully understood and appreciated.
_________________
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley
I have read it, and consider it one of his weaker novels - as he did himself - although I love everything he wrote. Being hyper-empathetic, I have a hard time hearing about graphic acts of violence; this is a problem I have with all of his major four novels, Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, The Brothers Karamazov and House of the Dead, insofar as they all contain unnecessarily explicit descriptions of violent acts.
I love the theme of Christian redemption at the end of the novel, and the idea that even as depraved a character as Raskolnikov can be redeemed by the Christian power of love. I do think this theme was summed up better and more maturely in Brothers Karamazov and even House of the Dead, however. Dostoyevsky considered The Idiot his best novel, and Prince Myshkin his surrogate son. I think if he had lived a little longer, however, he'd have concluded - rightly - that Brothers Karamazov was his best work. Alyosha, the hero, was actually named after his biological son, who died in infancy (I can't remember whether before or after The Idiot).
Dostoyevsky's view that our humanity is all that matters, is all that is capable of redeeming the endless suffering of our "being-in-the-world-as-such", as existentialists would call it, is I think the Alpha and Omega of his philosophy, and there are passages in Crime and Punishment which convey this very movingly. Just don't, whatever you do, view it as a detective story or a voyeuristic "slasher" type story. It is, apart from its quintessentially Russian morbid obsession with pain and violence, a fundamentally and humbly Christian work, though I don't mean this in too doctrinaire a sense. It's Christian in the sense that it's such a powerful eulogy on the Christian virtues and their power to transform the life of the lost, lonely individual; not to rid him of his suffering, but to allow him to achieve a kind of nobility through it; a kind of joy and despair at the same time. The central theme of Crime and Punishment is best summed up in these words from Brothers Karamazov, written by Dmitri to his brother Alyosha, after the former is convicted (presumably falsely) of patricide and sent to Siberia:
Sorry to derail further, but seeing a discussion about Dostoievsky here is so unusual I can't resist.
Try Demons/The Possessed - he anticipates the horrors of the Bolshevik revolution and the depravity of their methods and goals in uncanny detail and is generally a fascinating, if deeply disturbing book. Given some of your views and how well read you are, I think you would appreciate it.
Also, Joseph Frank wrote an excellent biography where he puts Dostoyevsky's work in context: historical, political and ideological without which I don't think his work can be fully understood and appreciated.
I've been dying to read both of those works for some time, but I've never seen them at my local libraries or bookstores, and I can barely afford online prices. In fact, I've just looked on Abebooks.co.uk (won't buy from Amazon for ethical reasons) and can't even find a copy of the Frank biography. I'll buy Devils shortly, I think; it's the only major work by Dostoyevsky that I haven't read, though I have to say that I'm more interested in his philosophical/religious ideas than his political ones.

Having fun at the Big Gay Out today. Very hot, lots of headache tablets, but fun.
Have you posted a pic of yourself before ? You are exactly as I imagined you.
I have posted a pic before but not looking so bright and cheerful.
After the sh*tfight of the Pride Parade it was nice to have a day that resembled celebration. Our community has been torn apart by the Parade fight, and I noticed a lot of people were absent that would normally be there. Conflict conflict



_________________
Not a Moderator.
AQ 40
ASD-1
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Post a picture: sausages only |
23 May 2025, 4:33 pm |
Are you a Terry Pratchett fan? Post your favorite quotation! |
26 May 2025, 8:29 pm |