nannarob wrote:
morning_after wrote:
nannarob wrote:
I am always impressed by the group wisdom of the cafe. I was thinking of this yesterday when Carol received the first posts here about R.
"Wise owls!" I thought. "Aha! A parliament of owls!"
I think this group would defy the current literature on aspergers and socialisation. We are so strong and wise as a group. We are a family!.
Well, thank you, but part of me thinks all the Aspies on WP defy that part of the literature.
Kind of like it assumes that just because we percieve the world in a different way we have no idea what's going on.
I think it's an easy assumption to make for an NT and a hard one to prove wrong for an AS.
Can you please clarify what you mean, Morning_after? I can't see any implication in my post that an aspie can't see 'what's going on.'
What do you mean by 'What's going on?"
One thing that I am surprised at is that you pick up implications. I have learnt not to imply anything since I started posting here because I find that few, if any aspies can pick up implications. In fact I am continually told by my friends that they can't do subtle and only straight talk works.
There is an incorrect assumption that sometimes we don't have any clue what is going on in the world around us.
Or that we cannot relate to other people because the fact that we need to study a reaction that people have, ask a lot of questions, etc. or just plain don't understand how to relate to them that we must be stupid and have no clue about anything that is going on around us (this person may be sad, that person may be angry, etc) just because we react to the world differently.
And as far as implications go, I was an English major in college and spent two semesters studying how people communicate. I think that helped me a lot.
We studied facial expressions, tone of voice, phrasing... the list could just go on and on. My classes were not exactly worried about telling people how to communicate, but studying how they did it.
I did primarily study literature, though.