SleepyDragon wrote:
lau wrote:
I'm sorry Sleepy, but you saying "I drew my own conclusion." just vaguely worries me. How can you look back on a tiny, out of context, sample of someone's actions over a hundred years ago and suggest that you can draw any sort of conclusion about them.
I jumped to a conclusion, yes, maybe an incorrect one, but one that was thoroughly grounded in my own childhood experiences, and a bit of, what's the word for ascribing the worst possible motives to someone's actions without much evidence to go on?
Usually I'm not so apt to judge. This particular instance just got under my skin.
Donning my grumpy old lady hat:
We are all entitled to our opinions and conclusions, and I believe we are even allowed to express them in a public forum such as this following certain guide lines of course.
I subscribe to Harper's and have access to their archives. The April of 1994 issue published several letters from Carroll to the Lidell's about photographing their three young daughters, preferably in the nude and unchaperoned. These letters were from a collection of letters by Carroll originally published by Oxford University Press. Harper's is a reputable magazine in existence since 1850. It's not a tabloid. I doubt the letters were counterfeit. They seemed pretty darn weird to me and would to most people I know.
I don't think this has anything to do with people from one culture making damning judgements against people from another culture, and I don't believe it's ever been common in any culture to take nude photographs of children without the presence of a parent or chaperone. Did Carroll do that? I have not seen evidence that he did. Did he write letters expressing his desire to do that? I do see evidence that he did. Does it matter? No, not much. Does it matter if we can or can not express an opinion or our conclusions about this subject. Yes, very much.
I don't know what difference it makes when the word paedophile was coined. Did they not exist before they had a name ? Do I think Carroll was a paedophile? Don't know enough about the dude. Would I let him or anyone else take nude shots of my children without my presence? No way.