lelia wrote:
I don't consider disagreement to equate with division. Lots of people here "hate" curebies, and I am one, but maybe not by someone else's definition. I understand many people have been through horrific times while someone tried to 'cure' them. Others have philosophical differences about anyone trying to change someone else to suit an ideal. There are lots of sparks in such discussions, but I don't know why that should be considered a division. We all want what is best for us and others on the spectrum, disagreeing only on the method. The only people I dislike on this site are the trolls, and they usually disappear pretty fast.
That makes sense. Having been unaware of AS most of my life, I am not used to connecting it with my experiences. So I'm going through a kind of reevaluation of my experience in light of my neural wiring, as it were. Before, difficulty interacting with others always just seemed like a personal problem, a failing. Now it looks more like a misunderstanding, a miscalibration. Actually I kind of always thought that, but didn't understand the lay of the land, and took to heart the difficulties.
In view of this, it is hard to walk into this new environment with so much to learn, and hearing so many different opinions.
Still this is a sign of health in the community! Monolithic institutions are much scarier than noisy arguments.
I mostly blog about politics, so I'm familiar with the trolls, but curious as to what form they would take here? Would a person that discredited the idea of the spectrum be considered a troll, and do people come on here trying to do something like that?