Page 100 of 162 [ 2587 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103 ... 162  Next

sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

21 Aug 2020, 11:39 pm

Back to the 1960s we go. You’re communist, if you disagree or get offended it just proves you’re communist.

Speaking of that. Is it ok to say all democrats are communist now?
Biden’s pretty racist so are all democrats racist? He also sexual raped women so are all democrats rapist now?


_________________
There is no place for me in the world. I'm going into the wilderness, probably to die


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Aug 2020, 11:42 pm

Fnord wrote:
Jakki wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Jakki wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Steve1963 wrote:
^ for someone who's up at 4:00 AM it sure takes you a while to get going...
It takes me a LOT to get going, no matter what time I get up!
Perhaps a quadruple shot of espresso to start your day.
That's what contributed to my second heart attack.
All recommendations via this site are not to be considered Bona Fide medical advice.  Aww, crud ... please ignore previous suggestion.
No worries.  I'm assuming that your intent was to be helpful.  Am I correct?


<Thinks: With Fnord out of the way, my intellectual status might improve. Hmmm. :mrgreen: >



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

21 Aug 2020, 11:42 pm

Brictoria wrote:
sly279 wrote:
alex wrote:
People really should just be nice and call out things they see as problems. If you say something about black people that's racist, you're probably at least a little bit racist, even if you didn't realize it.

It's like if you lock your car door when a black person walks by, you may not even realize you aren't doing it to white people.

I got called a racist nazi and threatened physical harm for saying I won’t support rioting by the way which is done by mostly white upper class liberals.

Guess that’s ok on you site.


I've had racial assumptions about my heritage used here to try and lessen the value of what I have posted by a member who protays themself as being against racism.

I've been called a racist and a bigot becuase a person wanted to focus on how an action affected one specific race, and I pointed out that it affected all races, and that it might be better to focus on fighting the action, rather than the race of a subset of those affected, if you wanted the action stopped.

I've seen members here refer to all on the right of the political spectrum as Nazi's - in a thread started with a poll asking if it was OK to punch Nazis, with only 2 options: yes, and yes - and in which none of the active participants saw any issue with this belief.

I've seen a member state that anyone who disagreed with a conservative was intelligent, perceptive, and wise, with "justification" supplie dto indicate that no conservative could hold those virtues...

I've seen a member say that supporting Trump is no different than liking Hitler.

And this is a small sample of what has been permitted (either through leaving it when reported, or allowing a precedent through other posts that were ignored (even worse is when a moderator is a part of the thread and doesn't see the issue themself and act accordingly on it, instead needing it to be "reported" and then maybe acted on), leading to it becoming "normalized"). As a result, this has given rise to a large number of people wondering what the point of the site is if they will be attacked for holding a different view, and so leaving the site...Along with who-knows how many potential members who see that and decide they would rather avoid the place altogether and so not even sign up.

Isn’t wp and there by Alex Liable if someone from this site goes out and assaults and or kills someone and then says look wp gave me the idea and supports it?

Hatred isn’t allowed here unless it’s hatred towards anyone who doesn’t vote democrat.
Err go wp is a hate site.


_________________
There is no place for me in the world. I'm going into the wilderness, probably to die


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

21 Aug 2020, 11:45 pm

League_Girl wrote:
sly279 wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
magz wrote:
Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
magz wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
In that sense, when I told someone "you're an idiot if you think you have to insult people to disagree," I did literally mean the person I was responding to because they had called me an idiot. So I did a comeback and that person and some other people did not like it.

Some people can dish it out but they cannot dish it back in.

What you describe sounds like responding to a personal attack with another personal attack.

Is it a personal attack or a strong disagreement :lol:

I'm waiting for League_Girl to judge.



I don't care if it's a personal attack. If someone decides to insult me, they shouldn't be surprised what I say to them next. I see it as self defense.

But then you get warned or banned. How’s that for fair?


Report the attack to the mod so they can get warned as well. :wink:

Well the mod supports and agrees with the attack on you. So they ban you.

Mean let’s say a mod is a kkk member. And a kkk member insults you and you insult them back. Who do you think the mod would side with? Welcome to wp if yiur democrat. If yiur conservative welcome to hell planet.


_________________
There is no place for me in the world. I'm going into the wilderness, probably to die


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

21 Aug 2020, 11:48 pm

Skilpadde wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
And this is a small sample of what has been permitted (either through leaving it when reported, or allowing a precedent through other posts that were ignored (even worse is when a moderator is a part of the thread and doesn't see the issue themself and act accordingly on it, instead needing it to be "reported" and then maybe acted on), leading to it becoming "normalized").
We don't moderate threads we have participated in (the mod attention thread being an exception because we've all been there, and it's not political or similarly hot topic).

Maybe you don’t, but I’ve seen the other mods do it. He’ll ive seem them mod supposed attacks directed at them. If a judge ruled over a case involving them they’d be disbarred.


_________________
There is no place for me in the world. I'm going into the wilderness, probably to die


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Aug 2020, 11:48 pm

League_Girl wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
We have words that have more than one meaning or have words that are spelled the same but sound different depending on how it is used like "read" and "bow" and we have words that are spelled different but sound the same like "red" and "read" and "buy" and "by" and "bye" and "hi" and "high."


Words that sound the same but are spelled differently are called homophones. (Homo = Same, Phone = Sound).


I would never say I'm dumping my child anywhere. To me that sounds like a word for garbage, or something that isn't wanted. I would say I'm "dropping her off" at the place. It must be a cultural thing, like you said. That's too bad the lady got upset because I'm sure it wasn't your intention.

One of my pet peeves is when people say "my kid" instead of "my child" or "my son / daughter". It just sounds very harsh to me. "Kids" is OK when it's plural, but somehow "kid" makes my skin crawl. If someone said they were going to dump their kid somewhere, I'd be flummoxed. I guess to an extent we all have our differences. I'm totally fine with the *c* word and with swearing, but some others find that offensive.


I also learned using female for a woman is incel and apparently women don't refer to themselves as female or their daughters as female but guys.

So I guess I am a guy pretending to be a woman and no wonder people get my gender wrong. :lol:


What rubbish.
I will use "female" and "male" if I choose. It was part of my generation before there was an "incel" label.
It doesn't make me an incel.
PC nonsense. :roll:



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Aug 2020, 11:54 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
I think there’s a stronger tendency among incels to use “female” or particularly “females” as a noun than there is in the generally population, and a corresponding aversion to using “women”, but occasionally using female as an adjective (or even as a noun) isn’t necessarily “proof” that one is an incel or inclined to that way of thinking.

Incels will often go further and say things like “femoid”. They have their own crazy language.


Do we have to explain this to people now?
So much for the educations system. EEP! 8O



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Aug 2020, 11:56 pm

Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
League_Girl wrote:

Also is it just me or did Alex change the layout of this forum, I hate how the posts look now. It was down just earlier and I couldn't access this forum.


Not just you , things are changing 8O


I thought my computer had a virus.
I was thinking about reinstalling.
Thanks for the head's up. :thumright:



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

21 Aug 2020, 11:57 pm

What’s ironic is bigots calling others bigots.
big·ot·ry
/ˈbiɡətrē/
noun
intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.


_________________
There is no place for me in the world. I'm going into the wilderness, probably to die


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

22 Aug 2020, 12:04 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
“People” cannot be misconstrued as a single person.

“Those people” is often said when one wants to make an ethnically/racially insensitive statement, though.


"You" people make me frustrated with your semantics :mrgreen: .



Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

22 Aug 2020, 12:05 am

Pepe wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
“People” cannot be misconstrued as a single person.

“Those people” is often said when one wants to make an ethnically/racially insensitive statement, though.


"You" people make me frustrated with your semantics :mrgreen: .


Was that an anti-semantic comment?



alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,216
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

22 Aug 2020, 12:07 am

You can't insult people but you can call them out for being something. Like you can say "you're being mean" but you can't say "you're an a**hole" or you're an idiot.

It should be pretty clear. If the word derogatory is in the definition of the word, it's not allowed.

It really isn't complicated and it has nothing to do with being on the left or right.

Another example: you can call someone a criminal but you can't call them a thug...

call someone a sex worker, can't call them a whore.

you all are making it seem like the rules are not fair but they apply equally.


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

22 Aug 2020, 12:10 am

alex wrote:
You can't insult people but you can call them out for being something. Like you can say "you're being mean" but you can't say "you're an as*hole" or you're an idiot.

It should be pretty clear. If the word derogatory is in the definition of the word, it's not allowed.

It really isn't complicated and it has nothing to do with being on the left or right.

Another example: you can call someone a criminal but you can't call them a thug...

call someone a sex worker, can't call them a whore.

you all are making it seem like the rules are not fair but they apply equally.


So as long as it doesn't expressly include "derogatory" (or some variation thereof) in the definition, even if society at large interprets it in that way, it is allowed 8O

Interesting...And exceedingly disappointing.



IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,433
Location: Chez Quis

22 Aug 2020, 12:12 am

I think the rules are fair. I've been endorsing the rules all along, and hoping that people will understand personal attacks and personal accountability.

I'm still confused how "White Supremacist" isn't derogatory, assuming that the person isn't one.

I would find it derogatory to be labelled by words that associate me with that ideology, just like it would be derogatory to call someone a sex worker OR a whore, if they weren't one.


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

22 Aug 2020, 12:12 am

IsabellaLinton wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
It’s the evolution (or devolution) of the English language.

An “idiotic idea” can be said to be a metaphor.

“Idiot” has very little to do with IQ these days. It has come to mean “absurdly dumb” in general.


Of course. I'm just explaining that it's still hurtful to call someone's idea "idiotic".

There are far nicer ways to say you disagree with an idea, so it won't sound insulting to their intelligence.

It's like when people are called "ignorant" on here. It surely implies they aren't smart, even though that's not the literal
meaning. People pull out their dictionaries to defend calling others ignorant.


Is it permissible to point out how idiotic it is to clog up so many pages with this
"idiotic" discussion about the word "idiot".
Not terribly original, but it will have to do.
I'm worn out reading all the drivel. :mrgreen:
Hopefully, it is coming to an end soon. 8O



alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,216
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

22 Aug 2020, 12:14 am

IsabellaLinton wrote:
I think the rules are fair. I've been endorsing the rules all along, and hoping that people will understand personal attacks and personal accountability.

I'm still confused how "White Supremacist" isn't derogatory, assuming that the person isn't one.

I would find it derogatory to be labelled by words that associate me with that ideology, just like it would be derogatory to call someone a sex worker OR a whore, if they weren't one.

if someone is spreading lies about someone that's a different thing. it doesn't fall under the personal attacks rule, it falls under whatever rule there is about not spreading lies about other people


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social