Page 1 of 2 [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

MasterJedi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,160
Location: in an open field west of a white house

30 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm

I think there shouldn't be a size (kb) limit on avatars hosted off-site because since the network hosting this board isn't storing the avatar itself. The dimension limit should remain the same since it would mess with the alignment of the board.

So, if I wanted to host my own avatar off-site like this for example, Image it shouldn't be a problem. It's under the dimensional size requirements but far too big file size wise to use as my avatar.

Is there any way to make it that way?


_________________
That is my spot, in an ever changing world, it is a single point of consistency. If my life were expressed as a function on a four dimensional Cartesian coordinate system, that spot, from the moment I first sat on it, would be 0-0-0-0.


TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

30 Dec 2010, 2:30 pm

I think the size restriction is to stop people using images which are so large (in bytes) that they would kill the response time of the pages. Not everyone has fast internet connections. If everyone had such images you could find that 99% of the data being downloaded to view a page consists purely of peoples avatar image data.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


MasterJedi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,160
Location: in an open field west of a white house

30 Dec 2010, 4:21 pm

but if it's hosted off-site...


_________________
That is my spot, in an ever changing world, it is a single point of consistency. If my life were expressed as a function on a four dimensional Cartesian coordinate system, that spot, from the moment I first sat on it, would be 0-0-0-0.


TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

30 Dec 2010, 4:37 pm

It is irrelevant if the images are hosted on-site or off-site because the image still has to be downloaded to the users computer. Having the images off-site would be a bonus for WP in that it would put less strain on the WP server so might be slightly faster in that respect for people who already have fast internet connections, but it won't benefit those with slow connections.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


Kaybee
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Oct 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,446
Location: A hidden forest

30 Dec 2010, 8:04 pm

I don't even think people should be able to have animated .gifs for avatars. :P Thank TFSM for the Escape key.


_________________
"A flower falls, even though we love it; and a weed grows, even though we do not love it."


MasterJedi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,160
Location: in an open field west of a white house

03 Jan 2011, 4:29 pm

so, all the youtube videos and pictures that are being displayed in any given thread...


_________________
That is my spot, in an ever changing world, it is a single point of consistency. If my life were expressed as a function on a four dimensional Cartesian coordinate system, that spot, from the moment I first sat on it, would be 0-0-0-0.


TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

03 Jan 2011, 5:29 pm

I block YouTube videos unless I really want to watch them. They take forever to download on dial-up. Some of the picture threads on WP and complete no-go areas for me - they take too long to show so I don't even bother trying. If everyone had large avatars WP would become unusable for everyone who isn't on fast internet.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


DaWalker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,837

03 Jan 2011, 6:00 pm

Kaybee wrote:
I don't even think people should be able to have animated .gifs for avatars. :P Thank TFSM for the Escape key.


Why :?:
My current one is 6.54 KB
Your current one is 10.67 KB



superboyian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,718
Location: London

03 Jan 2011, 6:01 pm

Maximum requirements:

130 x 160 pixels - size: 16kb

The server itself will upload the avatars that are offlink to WP's server itself and cdn (Content Delivery Network).


_________________
We are a community and we are one in unity.


TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

03 Jan 2011, 6:09 pm

DaWalker wrote:
Kaybee wrote:
I don't even think people should be able to have animated .gifs for avatars. :P Thank TFSM for the Escape key.


Why :?:
My current one is 6.54 KB
Your current one is 10.67 KB


And the spinning blue planet above is 133 KB. Nearly ten times the current WP max.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


DaWalker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,837

03 Jan 2011, 6:11 pm

Image



MasterJedi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,160
Location: in an open field west of a white house

03 Jan 2011, 8:21 pm

guys, the fact remains that the images posted here as well as the videos have to take up a hell of a lot of space.

If it's the case that WP is simply retaining the letters of the url to bind the thread to the video or picture and not the video or picture itself, then the same could be applied to people's avatars. Just have the site remember the string to link to off-site storage.


_________________
That is my spot, in an ever changing world, it is a single point of consistency. If my life were expressed as a function on a four dimensional Cartesian coordinate system, that spot, from the moment I first sat on it, would be 0-0-0-0.


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

04 Jan 2011, 1:59 am

DaWalker wrote:
Kaybee wrote:
I don't even think people should be able to have animated .gifs for avatars. :P Thank TFSM for the Escape key.


Why :?:
My current one is 6.54 KB
Your current one is 10.67 KB


I don't think the size is the issue in this case, some people just get distracted/annoyed/nauseated by flashing or moving images all over their screen.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


DaWalker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,837

04 Jan 2011, 3:39 am

distracted/annoyed/nauseated...Oh My

I can slow him down by 50%

hope that helps

:idea:



Kaybee
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Oct 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,446
Location: A hidden forest

04 Jan 2011, 6:11 am

DaWalker wrote:
distracted/annoyed/nauseated...Oh My

I can slow him down by 50%

hope that helps

:idea:


All of those things, yes. Slowing it down is greatly appreciated. Yours tend not to get to me as much as some other people's do, since they're generally rhythmic and not too fast. Some people have avatars which just seem terribly thoughtless and inconsiderate to me. This is a site for autistic people, most of us have sensory issues. Really, it seems obvious to me that animated avatars could pose problems, but maybe that's a theory of mind problem on my part.


_________________
"A flower falls, even though we love it; and a weed grows, even though we do not love it."


DaWalker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,837

04 Jan 2011, 6:46 am

Kaybee wrote:
DaWalker wrote:
distracted/annoyed/nauseated...Oh My
I can slow him down by 50%

hope that helps

:idea:

All of those things, yes. Slowing it down is greatly appreciated. Yours tend not to get to me as much as some other people's do, since they're generally rhythmic and not too fast. Some people have avatars which just seem terribly thoughtless and inconsiderate to me. This is a site for autistic people, most of us have sensory issues. Really, it seems obvious to me that animated avatars could pose problems, but maybe that's a theory of mind problem on my part.

This topic has flashed up before. The general consensus was if an avatar is offensive enough to raise complaints then the user will be asked to voluntarily remove it. I have received numerous compliments, never anything negative.

The only complaint about Any avatar I have ever used was that I had changed their favorite one.
I actually got a complaint once because I was using one that was not animated.
It was by far offensive, I have always used animated ones since day 1.
Except for that one day - which is at the bottom of this post.

I try my best to keep the size limited as possible as well as the color intensity.
Timing is the one that really hurts me the most, again, it's minimal.
Being thoughtless or inconsiderate does not apply.

Image