DataSage wrote:
"Freedom of speech" does not = sh*****g up threads with provacative and unrelated material. For instance, in the post I deleted, instead of trying to refute what I said,
The vast majority of the comment was EXACTLY that.
A refutation of what you were saying. Too bad you deleted
it, instead of splitting it off, for posterity, as now we only
have claims against one another.
Quote:
Calandale decides to throw in some smart comment about me being tyrannical, calling me "Mein Fuhrer" then claims that I have no right to control what's in that topic,
One short paragraph (as per my usual style),
in response to your "Get the hell out of MY thread"
statement. One which seemed a bit out of place,
in a public forum, which was the point I was making.
Quote:
when all that material was my original work.
Indeed? Then why isn't it locked? Why do you have no
problem with people gushing over your advice? Why when
someone starts to pick apart your claims, do you respond
by telling them to get out of
your thread?
Quote:
That thread is a megapost, the last thing we need is 5 pages of it full of petty insults and people quoting each other when it was designed to discuss the topic at hand.
The discussion was neither petty insults
nor was it off topic. It was a reasoned
criticism of some pretty questionable
advice.
31 Jul 2007, 7:10 pm
