Page 76 of 162 [ 2587 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 ... 162  Next

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

20 Aug 2020, 8:55 am

Brictoria wrote:
Maybe have a look at they posts you have made where you know people had a problem, and see if there is one (or more) factors or traits that some or all of them have in common, to help you pinpoint the cause of the problems?
Let me get this straight: you want me to look at the posts I've made -- the ones I already thought were perfectly okay when I made them -- to determine the nature of someone else's "problems"?

:roll: Really?

There is no "problem" with being concise, direct, and truthful, except in the minds of those who want everything soft, sugar-coated, and painted in pastel colors.



Steve1963
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2020
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,012
Location: western MA, USA

20 Aug 2020, 8:58 am

Fnord wrote:
There is no "problem" with being concise, direct, and truthful, except in the minds of those who want everything soft, sugar-coated, and painted in pastel colors.

There's a whole lot of space in between the two of those. You don't do gray, do you?



Last edited by Steve1963 on 20 Aug 2020, 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

Oh_no_its_Ferris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2020
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 728

20 Aug 2020, 8:59 am

BenderRodriguez wrote:
Pepe wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
I did check News in March and realised that a couple of users were basically using it like PPR, so I started checking there more often and gradually got it under control - although the steps I took were not always popular.

Surely you know why.


Sigh - I read The_Walrus' previous post 3 times trying to make up my mind if or how to answer it.

A few of us deliberately avoided posting links to obvious rule violations or confronting the mods directly about some of their actions that contributed or instigated trouble or inaction about things that have been repeatedly reported. As a mod, you cannot always pick and choose what you like doing, sometimes you just have to do what needs to be done because it's part of your job and nobody else will.

BUT... I also understand how sh***y the job can get and that such confrontation would only put them in a defensive position where they feel they have to justify their actions somehow, even the mistakes. And this will only lead to more strife and hostility on both sides.

I know some of my posts here were harsh, but I held back as much as I could and made a significant effort to try to point out problems instead of making accusations. I'll mention again that in over 8 years here I never got as much as a cautionary warning or had any kind of conflict with any mod, past or present. The only reason I decided to speak up, knowing that it might affect my friendships here and attract some degree of hostility, is the attachment I formed for WP and many of its inhabitants over time and the hope that whether this will still be a welcoming place for me or not, it will still be here for those that need it much more than I do.

I do hope though that after things settle and people feel a bit less raw, some will go over parts of this thread and try to re-examine their own past behaviour and decisions, along with the consequences they had on others in a more detached light, for their own benefit. And while it's not my decision, it would be great IMO if some people would actually receive an apology: both because I'm old-fashion enough to think it's the right thing to do, but also because some of those who left were quietly making the moderators' job a lot easier by mediating conflicts themselves, having a stabilising influence in the PPR and the whole forum and putting a lot of effort and time into helping new members integrate or taking care of vulnerable people in the Haven. These people will be very difficult to replace and I hope at least an attempt to reach out to them will be made.

Because no matter how heated up this thread got at times, most of us really want to let bygones be bygones and find a way to move on/forward in a fashion that will prevent history from repeating itself.


I don't believe you will lose any friends or get any animosity over your posts BR


_________________
Release me from moral assumption
Total rejection total destruction


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

20 Aug 2020, 9:02 am

Steve1963 wrote:
Fnord wrote:
There is no "problem" with being concise, direct, and truthful, except in the minds of those who want everything soft, sugar-coated, and painted in pastel colors.[/color]
There's a whole lot of space in between the two of those. You don't do gray, do you?
Yes, I "do gray"; but what's the point when posting something as innocuous as "Have a nice day!" can get me reported for bullying, hostile intent, and sarcasm all at once?  You might want to have a look around and see who else might be engaged in "Black & White" thinking, starting with those who complain about me the most.



Steve1963
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2020
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,012
Location: western MA, USA

20 Aug 2020, 9:07 am

Fnord wrote:
Yes, I "do gray"; but what's the point when posting something as innocuous as "Have a nice day!" can get me reported for bullying, hostile intent, and sarcasm all at once?  You might want to have a look around and see who else might be engaged in "Black & White" thinking, starting with those who complain about me the most.

I've seen your Have a nice day! and interpreted them as sarcasm myself. But are you seriously telling me that you've been reported to the mods for them?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

20 Aug 2020, 9:11 am

Steve1963 wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Yes, I "do gray"; but what's the point when posting something as innocuous as "Have a nice day!" can get me reported for bullying, hostile intent, and sarcasm all at once?  You might want to have a look around and see who else might be engaged in "Black & White" thinking, starting with those who complain about me the most.
I've seen your Have a nice day! and interpreted them as sarcasm myself. But are you seriously telling me that you've been reported to the mods for them?
When mods caution me against making sarcastic comments, I have to assume that either someone reported me for them or the mods acted on their own initiative.  Either way, no matter what I post, it seems that someone will object to it.



Steve1963
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2020
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,012
Location: western MA, USA

20 Aug 2020, 9:14 am

Fnord wrote:
When mods caution me against making sarcastic comments, I have to assume that either someone reported me for them or the mods acted on their own initiative.  Either way, no matter what I post, it seems that someone will object to it.
Well, I don't know the whole story, but if what you say is true, that's just wrong. Sorry you're being treated that way. I happen to love sarcasm. :)



Skilpadde
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,019

20 Aug 2020, 9:22 am

^ Yes, he has been reported for that. I like sarcasm too, it often makes me laugh.

The_Walrus wrote:
smudge wrote:

Hence why I have hardly responded. Constantly implying "Some people" and repeatedly specifying their actions (I.e. Mine) instead of talking to me about it first and actually asking ME what my intentions were, it's been a massive slagging off match in this thread. I get the implied includes me. A few of the people here have done it repetitively and have not stopped going on about it. I name names instead of making digs at people because I'm straight forward and prefer to address the issue then and there, not make snooty digs or dismiss people. Or f*cking list names of the entire forum except the users they don't like. "Some people", and being specific on their actions to imply its them, and complaining about them instead of assuming that maybe they aren't who they make them out to be. Honestly you think that's more tactful? If I have an issue with whoever, I name them OR I TALK TO THEM first. Fnord is honestly not the worst person here. At least he can take crap spoken about him.

I tried to say it earlier in this thread, but my post was deleted.

I honestly can’t remember who was saying it, so I’m not singling anyone out or holding any grudges. I just got a bit scared of the thread as a whole even though I knew a lot of people were making constructive comments. I appreciate that the ambiguity could be stressful for some people so I’m sorry.

Your suggestion that I PM people to get their thoughts is a good one. It shows real wisdom. I should probably do that more often. I guess I’d be concerned about either being seen as nosy or perhaps as domineering, but perhaps that’s better than being ineffectual.


Asking an offender about intent is as effective as the questionnaire we had to fill out on the plane on the way to the US. One of the questions was if I planned on doing anything criminal while there :roll: Would anyone be dumb enough to say yes?
Not likely, and if there is anything my experience has taught me, it is that those who are less likely to do something intentionally are often less good at explaining, while those who are more likely to bite, are good at sealioning and making themselves seem innocent and possibly the victim. This place is not without ppl like that. If I was asked why I posted this response for instance, I wouldn't have any other answer than "it's what I mean".

Back to the plane thing, I was smart enough to tick the right box of course, but dang it was tempting to say yes, of course, why else do you think I'm here :lol: :P :twisted: :mrgreen:


_________________
BOLTZ 17/3 2012 - 12/11 2020
Beautiful, sweet, gentle, playful, loyal
simply the best and one of a kind
love you and miss you, dear boy

Stop the wolf kills! https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeact ... 3091429765


magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

20 Aug 2020, 9:36 am

Skilpadde wrote:
Asking an offender about intent is as effective as the questionnaire we had to fill out on the plane on the way to the US. One of the questions was if I planned on doing anything criminal while there :roll: Would anyone be dumb enough to say yes?

Asking someone who hurts us if that hurtful thing is what they really mean often ends with clarifications and/or apologies.
Most people who offend others do it in a heat or the moment, not for the sake of offending itself.
Additionally, Aspies often offend by miscommunication.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Oh_no_its_Ferris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2020
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 728

20 Aug 2020, 9:44 am

I'm too honest for my own good sometimes , I should of definitely kept my mouth shut at certain points in my life :twisted:


_________________
Release me from moral assumption
Total rejection total destruction


The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

20 Aug 2020, 10:05 am

BenderRodriguez wrote:
Pepe wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
I did check News in March and realised that a couple of users were basically using it like PPR, so I started checking there more often and gradually got it under control - although the steps I took were not always popular.

Surely you know why.


Sigh - I read The_Walrus' previous post 3 times trying to make up my mind if or how to answer it.

A few of us deliberately avoided posting links to obvious rule violations or confronting the mods directly about some of their actions that contributed or instigated trouble or inaction about things that have been repeatedly reported. As a mod, you cannot always pick and choose what you like doing, sometimes you just have to do what needs to be done because it's part of your job and nobody else will.

BUT... I also understand how sh***y the job can get and that such confrontation would only put them in a defensive position where they feel they have to justify their actions somehow, even the mistakes. And this will only lead to more strife and hostility on both sides.

I know some of my posts here were harsh, but I held back as much as I could and made a significant effort to try to point out problems instead of making accusations. I'll mention again that in over 8 years here I never got as much as a cautionary warning or had any kind of conflict with any mod, past or present. The only reason I decided to speak up, knowing that it might affect my friendships here and attract some degree of hostility, is the attachment I formed for WP and many of its inhabitants over time and the hope that whether this will still be a welcoming place for me or not, it will still be here for those that need it much more than I do.

I do hope though that after things settle and people feel a bit less raw, some will go over parts of this thread and try to re-examine their own past behaviour and decisions, along with the consequences they had on others in a more detached light, for their own benefit. And while it's not my decision, it would be great IMO if some people would actually receive an apology: both because I'm old-fashion enough to think it's the right thing to do, but also because some of those who left were quietly making the moderators' job a lot easier by mediating conflicts themselves, having a stabilising influence in the PPR and the whole forum and putting a lot of effort and time into helping new members integrate or taking care of vulnerable people in the Haven. These people will be very difficult to replace and I hope at least an attempt to reach out to them will be made.

Because no matter how heated up this thread got at times, most of us really want to let bygones be bygones and find a way to move on/forward in a fashion that will prevent history from repeating itself.

Zero problem with you, Bender - you’re a great user :)



BenderRodriguez
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,343

20 Aug 2020, 10:05 am

Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
I don't believe you will lose any friends or get any animosity over your posts BR


I wish you were right, but some people still see things in terms of taking sides and grudges tend to last a long time on this site.

Failing that, a bit of emotional blackmail can't hurt either :wink:

Image


_________________
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

20 Aug 2020, 10:16 am

BenderRodriguez wrote:
... some people still see things in terms of taking sides, and grudges tend to last a long time on this site...
I can vouch for that.



IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,433
Location: Chez Quis

20 Aug 2020, 10:27 am

The_Walrus wrote:
The s**t that people have been posting that was said to Sly - I honestly hadn’t seen any of that. It’s obviously unacceptable and the mangy dog thing should have resulted in a ban.


I'd like clarification about this so that I understand the rules better. The comment was made on 12 June and you commented about it on that thread, asking members to refrain from that type of language, within three hours. I reported it later that same day by PM to the mods. The mod said it was inappropriate and they would remove it or edit the comment. I think it was a break of the rules, and Sly was very offended. Here you say that it was unacceptable and should have resulted in a ban. The comment is still visible and I'm just wondering why that would be? I'm not trying to cause undue difficulty or challenge anyone's decision-making, but if it "should have resulted in a ban" and it was addressed that day, I'm wondering why there has been over two months of delay having this comment addressed. Is there a statue of limitations on bans, or why wasn't a ban done that day?


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

20 Aug 2020, 10:30 am

magz wrote:
... Aspies often offend by miscommunication.
What is said/written, what is meant, what is heard/read, and how it is interpreted are the four main "channels" in which miscommunication may occur.

What is posted is obvious to all, but what is interpreted may be entirely different from the obvious depending on who submitted the post and who is reading it.

What is meant by what is posted should not be assumed beyond that which is obvious.  If clarification is needed, then the person who submitted the post should be queried.  Assuming hostile intent before such a query is made is an injustice that rarely, if ever, gets corrected.



Steve1963
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2020
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,012
Location: western MA, USA

20 Aug 2020, 10:33 am

Fnord wrote:
What is meant by what is posted should not be assumed beyond that which is obvious.  If clarification is needed, then the person who submitted the post should be queried.  Assuming hostile intent before such a query is made is an injustice that rarely, if ever, gets corrected.
Are you prepared for countless queries into your intent then? :lol: