BenderRodriguez wrote:
blazingstar wrote:
There have been several occasions in which my posts have been taken poorly by a reader. I have apologized for the posts and never meant them to be offensive. I have to think very hard to come up with a post that I think cannot be taken poorly. I suppose that is like walking on egg shells. It is difficult for me to express my ideas.
This has been my experience too. Sometimes I get frustrated or annoyed if I feel what I'm saying is misunderstood or misconstrued so I just make a short apology and clarification and disengage. Protracted exchanges and splitting hairs just ended up causing more trouble - at leas for me.
blazingstar wrote:
I think there has been way too much focus on Fnord in this thread. Fnord is irrelevant to the well-being of the forum. Even if I were to stipulate that all the accusations were true, I still do not see Fnord as a reason for the site to be going downhill. So many pages of a thread being devoted to one person is insane, people. (I am trying to figure out if that last sentence is permitted.)
Yeah, I know. One user here was so exasperated that assumed the constant derailments are a deliberate manouver to distract from the core issues

And thank you for the kind words, blaze

I've learned to change my words and how I talk like I will now say "some people" or "most people" or "few people" or even mentioned what I have observed online regarding behaviors. But someone on here will still twist it and change it to "all" or something and still take offense.
Also, I don't think people should say "some" when it's pretty obvious what they are talking about such as "I have issues with feminism" and reading the OP it's pretty obvious he was talking about radical feminists who bash all men and express misandry. But some users still took offense to mean "all feminists."
I can't make everyone happy and someone out there will still think "oh League Girl is talking about me" and my comeback is 'You are not the only one who does that behavior' just so they know it's not about them. really, I can't imagine writing down usernames all over the internet and listing behaviors they do I don't like or have observed just so I can list all names from all over the internet to ensure someone here I am not talking about them when I make a post here.
Then we have members here believing "oh members here just change their words to veil their attacks so the mods won't notice."
And I am sitting here wondering, "how the heck do you do a personal attack without doing a personal attack?"
And I am too lazy to go back in this thread to even find user names that made these claims to list their names here so they won't feel I am being passive aggressive. To me it's even ridiculous to even do this. Though I remember Smudge and Kraftiekortie have mentioned saying they want it said to their face. I never had a problem with them though so I have nothing critical to say about them. Though Smudge has mistaken my tone once saying I was sly or something and another user here (who no longer comes here) said she has never seen me do something like that.
But anyway, I have realized people will always misinterpret your words and tone and people will get offended either way. We can't please everyone.
Some, most, lots, isn’t ok either, i was told using them would be in line with the rules, but even using them I still get reported and warned.
of them to do that. The bold seems to be a code
of them to do that. Pretty sure fnord would take it to be about him why else bold it?