Making it Better: The future of WP
Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
Fnord wrote:
racism on this website is both subtle and insidious.
As is some of the bullying that occurs._________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
kraftiekortie wrote:
There are ways to prove bullying----but there are times when one must be an expert linguist to prove it. One must also be knowledgeable, say, about the idioms and subtleties of a particular language. When I said "dissect," I should said "parse."
By what parsing protocols would you program a computer to determine that "Have a nice day!" is sarcasm?
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,228
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Fnord wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Fnord wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Apparently I need to get better at playing the victim like some of our fragile racists seem to have mastered.
Who are the fragile racists who play victim?I am not saying or implying that any specific people are racist, but only that those 3 tendencies I mentioned may be common to racist people.
That's one of the more common items I would refer to as 'white supremacism', and it's one that's readily addressable because teaching the accomplishments of Amerind and African peoples alongside those of the Middle Eastern peoples that Europeans claim the heritage of** would go a long way towards reducing that tendency. This is why some communities are much more vocal about cultural appropriation than others, because they're used to constantly being diminished and not credited for their stuff.
**for that matter I'd encourage the teaching of Europe's deep history alongside the traditional Western canon
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Fnord wrote:
Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
Fnord wrote:
racism on this website is both subtle and insidious.
As is some of the bullying that occurs.Like you said some see insults in completely unrelated statements but it can also be a tactic used by narcissists and learned behaviour by narcissist survivors to gaslight people.
Again I am replying to you , it is not aimed at you. ( this is going to get old real quick if I have to qualify my posts
_________________
Release me from moral assumption
Total rejection total destruction
Last edited by Oh_no_its_Ferris on 20 Aug 2020, 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It's difficult to convey irony, sarcasm, etc. via written text. This is because you are not actually WITH that person in the same physical area as them.
One must read the whole exchange in order to speculate about the intent of "have a nice day."
I have encountered "have a nice day" said in a:
1. Sarcastic tone
2. Irritated tone
3. Dismissive tone
4. Condescending tone
5. Sincere tone.
And many others that I can't think of at the moment.
Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Some, most, lots, isn’t ok either, i was told using them would be in line with the rules, but even using them I still get reported and warned.
I remember XFG used to ride you hard on your generalizations , I always thought it was a little unfair but you toed the line and changed your ways.
And still I got reported and warned. For even saying one woman is a certain way is sexist.
_________________
There is no place for me in the world. I'm going into the wilderness, probably to die
Fnord wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Fnord wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Apparently I need to get better at playing the victim like some of our fragile racists seem to have mastered.
Who are the fragile racists who play victim?I am not saying or implying that any specific people are racist, but only that those 3 tendencies I mentioned may be common to racist people.
Racist people also do not know they are racist and they will downplay everything as you said. They will also list reasons for their racism always backing it up with logic and "facts."
For example they will look at people like Oprah or Candace Owens and say black people can be successful if they try hard.
Ben Shapiro does a darn good job dismissing systemic racism.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
funeralxempire wrote:
Fnord wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Fnord wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Apparently I need to get better at playing the victim like some of our fragile racists seem to have mastered.
Who are the fragile racists who play victim?I am not saying or implying that any specific people are racist, but only that those 3 tendencies I mentioned may be common to racist people.
**for that matter I'd encourage the teaching of Europe's deep history alongside the traditional Western canon
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
sly279 wrote:
Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Some, most, lots, isn’t ok either, i was told using them would be in line with the rules, but even using them I still get reported and warned.
I remember XFG used to ride you hard on your generalizations , I always thought it was a little unfair but you toed the line and changed your ways.
And still I got reported and warned. For even saying one woman is a certain way is sexist.
your card was marked before I became a mod Sly , I did try and make a difference
_________________
Release me from moral assumption
Total rejection total destruction
kraftiekortie wrote:
t's difficult to convey irony, sarcasm, etc. via written text. This is because you are not actually WITH that person in the same physical area as them. One must read the whole exchange in order to speculate about the intent of "have a nice day."...
Exactly my point! Although you could easily replace "speculate" with "guess" or "fantasize" and retain the same meaning.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Based on context, #5.
^ correct_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Fnord wrote:
Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
Fnord wrote:
racism on this website is both subtle and insidious.
As is some of the bullying that occurs.This is what I call a straw man. You write something and someone makes a argument about something you never even argued about.
An example would be on another website, someone posted a video of a truck not allowing a speeder to pass and the truck deliberately kept with the same sped as the semi to keep the speeder from passing. Then at the end the speeder got impatient and drove into the thing that separates the freeway (it has grass in it too) and it caused the wreck of himself, the truck and the semi.
I wrote it took two to cause the wreck and that they were both idiots.
Now someone other user decided to attack me saying "It does not take two to cause a wreck, what a dumb line of thinking" and then did a straw man by asking if they were waiting at a stop light and someone came up and rear ended them.
Yes that was a straw man there because my argument was about playing road patrol and not allowing them to pass and the person playing road patrol put their lives and other lives in danger around them. I do not think that wreck would have happened if the truck man would have let the speeder pass him than speeding up to keep him from passing.
I call it splitting hairs. People that do this tend to annoy me.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
