21 Oct 2007, 4:30 am
21 Oct 2007, 5:06 am
21 Oct 2007, 5:09 am
21 Oct 2007, 5:17 am
It's more like
Calandale vs Quatermass 
21 Oct 2007, 5:17 am
LePetitPrince wrote:
ding ding ding .
calandale vs MrMark
FIGHT!! !
:popcorn:
calandale vs MrMark
FIGHT!! !
:popcorn:
At least we have someone here with a sense of humour. Where's the bookie?
calandale wrote:
Quatermass wrote:
Okay calandale, I have had enough. I have put up with enough crap to put me in the fertiliser business for a lifetime, and that is just IRL. So I am not going to put up with any more from you. You delight in provoking me.
Deny that all you want, but in the end, this thread isn't about pirnciple, or moderator corruption.
It's because you like to beat off while we get frustrated.
Deny that all you want, but in the end, this thread isn't about pirnciple, or moderator corruption.
It's because you like to beat off while we get frustrated.
My my. You really SHOULD watch your
temper. I've not been the one to stray
to insults, or claims of this sort yet.
Corruption? I don't think that's the word for
it. The only manner in which I'd apply that
is to claim that the power of the position
has corrupted the holders of it to the point
where they KNOW that they are right.
I'm awaiting my ban for being civil.
I ain't giving you the satisfaction.
21 Oct 2007, 5:18 am
21 Oct 2007, 5:18 am
I suppose this thread will be locked soon
21 Oct 2007, 5:22 am
greenblue wrote:
It's more like
Calandale vs Quatermass
Calandale vs Quatermass
Why, thank you.
21 Oct 2007, 5:24 am
21 Oct 2007, 5:24 am
21 Oct 2007, 5:25 am
Quatermass wrote:
greenblue wrote:
It's more like
Calandale vs Quatermass
Calandale vs Quatermass
Why, thank you.
I think you should have this duel on intensity. Its then a level playing field.
21 Oct 2007, 5:27 am
gwenevyn wrote:
calandale wrote:
If
mods didn't see every criticism as some
slight to their own character, this place would
be much better handled.
mods didn't see every criticism as some
slight to their own character, this place would
be much better handled.
Yet, honestly, to my reasonably unbiased eye, it did appear that their character was brought into the debate. I know we're aspies here, but I can't help but wish to see these sorts of complaints structured in a manner more conducive to calm discussion of concepts rather than something that too closely resembles an attack. This is assuming that the point of such complaints is to arrive at a resolution of the perceived problem.
Thank you, gwenevyn.
21 Oct 2007, 5:31 am
Hadron wrote:
Quatermass wrote:
greenblue wrote:
It's more like
Calandale vs Quatermass
Calandale vs Quatermass
Why, thank you.
I think you should have this duel on intensity. Its then a level playing field.
Bollocks. For one thing, I don't have an account for Intensity. For another, because of the fact that I have this computer on lease from the uni, I can't access anything that will have violent and/or pornographic imagery. Finally, I wouldn't be seen dead on Intensity.
Besides, I never abuse my mod powers for deletion. The only thing I am willing to do is rearrange his quotes in my posts. And anyone can do that.
21 Oct 2007, 5:33 am
greenblue wrote:
It's more like
Calandale vs Quatermass
Calandale vs Quatermass
Sadly. I thought MrMark was handling
himself fine (outside of his brief tantrum).
But, QM's been spoiling for this. And now
that it's not about what was really a friendly
bit of humor on my part, I'm willing to oblige.
21 Oct 2007, 5:34 am
Hadron wrote:
Quatermass wrote:
greenblue wrote:
It's more like
Calandale vs Quatermass
Calandale vs Quatermass
Why, thank you.
I think you should have this duel on intensity. Its then a level playing field.
I'd lose there.
Here, I'm not despised
by the membership.
21 Oct 2007, 5:35 am
