Asp-Z wrote:
Nah, I think they all do it to the same extent. Look at the Dell Streak - pretty underpowered by today's standards, but they'll be able to launch the next one with a dual core whatever-the-next-processor-will-be and get people to upgrade.
I don't rate Dell as smartphone makers either but other companies do put more (not everything) out there, I'd say HTC are one.
Asp-Z wrote:
The iPad was the first tablet which actually had a mobile OS optimised for tablet hardware as opposed to a full blown OS with a touch screen and a stylus thrown on top. Those old tablets were also very expensive - >£1,000 from what I remember.
I have an iPad and I find it very useful for basic computing - checking e-mails, browsing the web, playing games, etc. We know this kind of thing is already popular because netbooks sell so much, and iPads are already eating that market up because they do everything they do much more nicely. That's all there is to it really; look at what people like and improve it. That's all Apple's products are. Combine that with a very good PR team and you have Apple's secret recipe.
I don't rate tablets either. Each of those things that you find your iPad useful for, I do quite adequately on my Desire and that fits in my pocket. iPad is just like a backwards version of the iPhone. The Desire HD is bigger than the Desire and I'd have that but I can't see me going much above that really, I don't want to have to carry something else around seperately.
Asp-Z wrote:
Android is something I like because it's unique in its approach. They may have copied some UI elements from Apple, but iOS and Android are polar opposites, and it's always great to see mainstream open source software in any market.
I'll agree with that one, the open element great!