blazingstar wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Anybody who sends an unsolicited hostile PM should be banned.
I’ve been sent a few of those. It’s annoying.
I wouldn't go that far, I've generally had no problem with making posters who send those see the error of their ways. And if that not possible the foe list is always an option.
So, how do you do that, make others see the error of their ways?
I am seriously interested. Not at all meaning to sound snarky, in case it does.
In the case I'm referring to the poster wasn't someone who was comfortable sustaining hostility, so after the first PM where he basically threw a tantrum I pointed out that so far nothing approaching hostility had existed and pointed to where his actions caused things to become hostile and from there began pointing out where escalations had occurred and who chose to escalate. Once he had conceded on that I made my case again, but a little more willing to explain since I now had an engaged audience instead of just someone looking to argue.
I don't believe that approach will always work because some of us are more comfortable dealing with hostility. This was actually one of the first observations I made in that PM chain, that he was less able to sustain this sort of interaction and that basically it had become a matter of how much face he'd be allowed to preserve and since all I wanted was an apology and to not be slandered.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.