RADICAL CHANGES

Post Reply New Topic

now now lets not go to such extremes of a total shut down PhilosopherBoi. Heres what I think we should do. Alex should come to power again, freeze all moderator powers, nominate 20 new candidates, including all of the old, and have us all vote in new moderators or vote old ones back in and we hold such a vote every 2-4 years.

democracy always wins.

As things are right now there is no law governing this realm, and as such drastic measures are need to protect the innocent. Closing Wrong Planet for a short time until legal enforcement would give, Alex both the time he needs to select moderators and to upgrade the system to a newer version. After which I would think it would be best if we work though a democracy as you have suggested because it is clear that checks and balances are needed because do we truly want another lawless time ever again?

§ 14‑196.3.  Cyberstalking.
(a)       The following definitions apply in this section:
(1)       Electronic communication. – Any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature, transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, computer, electromagnetic, photoelectric, or photo‑optical system.
(2)       Electronic mail. – The transmission of information or communication by the use of the Internet, a computer, a facsimile machine, a pager, a cellular telephone, a video recorder, or other electronic means sent to a person identified by a unique address or address number and received by that person.
(b)       It is unlawful for a person to:
(1)       Use in electronic mail or electronic communication any words or language threatening to inflict bodily harm to any person or to that person's child, sibling, spouse, or dependent, or physical injury to the property of any person, or for the purpose of extorting money or other things of value from any person.
(2)       Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another repeatedly, whether or not conversation ensues, for the purpose of abusing, annoying, threatening, terrifying, harassing, or embarrassing any person.
(3)       Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another and to knowingly make any false statement concerning death, injury, illness, disfigurement, indecent conduct, or criminal conduct of the person electronically mailed or of any member of the person's family or household with the intent to abuse, annoy, threaten, terrify, harass, or embarrass.
(4)       Knowingly permit an electronic communication device under the person's control to be used for any purpose prohibited by this section.
(c)       Any offense under this section committed by the use of electronic mail or electronic communication may be deemed to have been committed where the electronic mail or electronic communication was originally sent, originally received in this State, or first viewed by any person in this State.
(d)       Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor.
(e)       This section does not apply to any peaceable, nonviolent, or nonthreatening activity intended to express political views or to provide lawful information to others. This section shall not be construed to impair any constitutionally protected activity, including speech, protest, or assembly. (2000‑125, s. 1; 2000‑140, s. 91.)

Yes they did respond that is true however they neglected their duties and poured salt in deep wounds which is not acceptable behavirior for moderators. Because of their neglect to their duties not just the one I dealt with but all of them it does make this realm a lawless area. While wrong planet itself is not quilty of commitng crimes some of its members are, remember harrasment and bulling are against the law here is a sample of a law from where I live.

§ 14‑196.3.  Cyberstalking.

(e)       This section does not apply to any peaceable, nonviolent, or nonthreatening activity intended to express political views or to provide lawful information to others. This section shall not be construed to impair any constitutionally protected activity, including speech, protest, or assembly. (2000‑125, s. 1; 2000‑140, s. 91.)

Further more Alex does not maininte this site like he should nor does he answer the plight of those who ask for assisatiance so yes inddeed a democratic system would be needed to put checks and balances into place to prevent people from being hurt and those with power from abusing such power.

Yes they did respond that is true however they neglected their duties and poured salt in deep wounds which is not acceptable behavirior for moderators. Because of their neglect to their duties not just the one I dealt with but all of them it does make this realm a lawless area. While wrong planet itself is not quilty of commitng crimes some of its members are, remember harrasment and bulling are against the law here is a sample of a law from where I live.



Further more Alex does not maininte this site like he should nor does he answer the plight of those who ask for assisatiance so yes inddeed a democratic system would be needed to put checks and balances into place to prevent people from being hurt and those with power from abusing such power.

now now lets not go to such extremes of a total shut down PhilosopherBoi. Heres what I think we should do. Alex should come to power again, freeze all moderator powers, nominate 20 new candidates, including all of the old, and have us all vote in new moderators or vote old ones back in and we hold such a vote every 2-4 years.

democracy always wins.

Compassion all around is appropriate here. For example, Fnord is currently experiencing extreme emotional trauma anytime anything reminds him of emos.

I'm not sure what triggered this, but I suspect he might have had a precognition about his next incarnation.

Is this an accurate summary of what's going on here?

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Original thread:
Fnord says: Now I understand why you are the way you are, PB.
Sinsbodly says: Fnord didn't violate rules. pB later attacked Fnord which is a violation of the rules.

This thread:
Fnord says: pB's probems are caused by pB.
pB says: Fnord's a troll.
Fnord says: I'm just stating my opinion, not trying to cause harm. Let's be friends.

[ a bunch of stuff about ego ]

Fnord says: I'll still be friends, but if I disagree with an opinion I will still respond with such.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Is this it? Seems like a lot of drama over nothing.

Yes they did respond that is true however they neglected their duties and poured salt in deep wounds which is not acceptable behavirior for moderators. Because of their neglect to their duties not just the one I dealt with but all of them it does make this realm a lawless area. While wrong planet itself is not quilty of commitng crimes some of its members are, remember harrasment and bulling are against the law here is a sample of a law from where I live.



Further more Alex does not maininte this site like he should nor does he answer the plight of those who ask for assisatiance so yes inddeed a democratic system would be needed to put checks and balances into place to prevent people from being hurt and those with power from abusing such power.

(e)       This section does not apply to any peaceable, nonviolent, or nonthreatening activity intended to express political views or to provide lawful information to others. This section shall not be construed to impair any constitutionally protected activity, including speech, protest, or assembly. (2000‑125, s. 1; 2000‑140, s. 91.)

Yes they did respond that is true however they neglected their duties and poured salt in deep wounds which is not acceptable behavirior for moderators. Because of their neglect to their duties not just the one I dealt with but all of them it does make this realm a lawless area. While wrong planet itself is not quilty of commitng crimes some of its members are, remember harrasment and bulling are against the law here is a sample of a law from where I live.



Further more Alex does not maininte this site like he should nor does he answer the plight of those who ask for assisatiance so yes inddeed a democratic system would be needed to put checks and balances into place to prevent people from being hurt and those with power from abusing such power.

I do not think wrongplanet should be closed. It's not fair for those of us who love the support. I also feel the moderators are no doing an adequate job, and can be abusive. Also, I agree about Fnord. he's very arrogant, and every time I see one of his posts you can be bound to see him making om cynical or sarcastic remark. He is always acting as if he is better than everyone else on here.
Alex should be much more active on the forums.

I like this idea, but make it more like every 3 months with the polls being open for 1 month, and a 3 month membership/500 post minimum to vote. That way moderators couldn't be too abusive because they risk being voted out, and it encourages participation in the site by having a minimum amount necessary in order to vote. The number of mods could also be expanded, so that the power would be more evenly distributed and there would be less pressure on individual mods given the size of this board. I doubt the idea will gain much traction however, as I've been reminded the opinions of the members of this board are irrelevant to it's running.