Making it Better: The future of WP
I didn't.
I came to poke fun at Fnord.

"Poking fun" is NOT a good phrase to use. That's what NTs so often do with us. I saw the thing between you and Fnord as a humorous exchange. Laugh with him, not at him!

Say what?

Last edited by Pepe on 22 Aug 2020, 6:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,541
Location: Right over your left shoulder
And "you" are offended by being called a Racist,
And yet they persist in saying "you" are a Racist,
While there is no evidence that "you" are a Racist,
The intent is to offend.

However, if someone calls a poster racist because they insist on expressing racist opinions and gaslighting everyone when called on it, they're still a racist but now also a dishonest bully (at least when they attempt to use the mods as a weapon against people who have noticed how their posts read). Not agreeing that one is racist doesn't automatically mean that one isn't racist. Not self-identifying as a white supremacist or western chauvinist doesn't inherently disqualify one from counting (those two are largely synonymous but splitting hairs isn't actually a defence if it passes the duck test).
I know who I am, and I am not a racist.
There are *considerations* that can be made because a logical, intelligent person thinks critically, despite the rabid howling groupthinking lynch mob's objections.
Simple speculation often gives our social ferals the excuse to come out with torches and pitchforks, however.
In other words,
I haven't been into the PPR forum for ages, darling.

I know you haven't and please don't read too much between the lines. I acknowledge my own racism, and there does appear to be a tendency among those who don't to be much more readily offended by having the term applied to them, but if I would call me racist, do you doubt that I would call you it too?
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Yet, these feuds and petty grudges created on political grounds have been spilling all over the forum, including the Haven and the rest of us can't use the forum for its intended purpose without every other thread being derailed into endless, repetitive and violent arguments and downright harassment (some people were indeed threatened with physical violence). It's enough to disagree with someone on non-political issues to be called a snowflake, a Nazi or even a racist.
There has also been a serious problem with the way very young people and those lower functioning are being treated, which included various forms of invalidation, insults and being told to their faces that their opinions and experiences don't matter due to their age or level of impairment.
So a lot of people left or found a home on other Autistic fora. And it's usually the polite, articulate ones who contributed greatly to keeping this place together.
Don't you think these are serious issues? Do you want non-Americans and those who refuse to participate in this circus and use this place for its intended purpose to just leave?
Well i think we should do whatever we can to stop that from happening to be honest.
I'm glad this exchange took place, this is a good point to move forward from.
To view this place as a community, and to focus on solutions for the whole membership will require compromise.
As a European I believed that I was included meaningfully, ive realised that this has not been the case.
It's good to know that action will be taken to ensure that non American Autistic people wont continue to be pushed out and treated as less valued or second class Autistic members because of the location we post from.
_________________
http://www.neurovoice.org
An ASD inclusive peer-orientated space for social interaction and support, where the Autism Spectrum is the norm, all are welcome.
It took half a day,
But I finally finished.

Half a day became a few hours powered by coffee

_________________
http://www.neurovoice.org
An ASD inclusive peer-orientated space for social interaction and support, where the Autism Spectrum is the norm, all are welcome.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 38,085
Location: Long Island, New York
We just have to iron things out.
I’ve had racist things done to me....and I’ve also benefited from “white privilege.” Getting and keeping my job and apartment has had nothing to do with “white privilege,” though.
It’s nonsense to believe that an oppressed race cannot themselves be racist.
No one has ever said the oppressed can't be prejudice. When they say they can't be racist, what they mean is their prejudice over people have no power. Racism holds power. If a black person or some other minority is prejudice about white people, we are not oppressed.
While many more black people are oppressed then white people individual white people can be oppressed. Individual white people can be oppressed and individual black people can be racist.
Oxford definition of racism
“ prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.
the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another.“
By definition saying only white people can be racist is a racist statement in that it ascribes a negative characteristic to one race.
In regards to an earlier post of yours, yes people absolutely use words and phrases differently then dictionary definitions. That does not make them correct. For instance despite dictionary and professional definitions of Autism autistic is often conflated with intellectual disability, ie ret*d.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Last edited by ASPartOfMe on 22 Aug 2020, 5:49 am, edited 2 times in total.
It took half a day,
But I finally finished.

Half a day became a few hours powered by coffee

Move along people, this spoiler is only for Amity.



Do you think anyone else is reading this spoiler?

So you don't care about breaking the rules after someone else broke them first?
Precisely, Alex should add to the rules "no self defense, please use the mods against your attacker to get them into trouble."

Crap, I think I just tipped my enemies off on how to get rid of me.

That would be redundant, as it would translate to "no breaking rules, even if in (perceived) self defence."
We can of course make a heap of "no breaking rules" rules but it wouldn't change anything, would it?
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
So you don't care about breaking the rules after someone else broke them first?
Precisely, Alex should add to the rules "no self defense, please use the mods against your attacker to get them into trouble."

Crap, I think I just tipped my enemies off on how to get rid of me.

That would be redundant, as it would translate to "no breaking rules, even if in (perceived) self defence."
We can of course make a heap of "no breaking rules" rules but it wouldn't change anything, would it?
There *has to* be some leeway.
The main thing is that decisions need to be equitable/impartial/consistent.
It took half a day,
But I finally finished.

Half a day became a few hours powered by coffee

Move along people, this spoiler is only for Amity.



Do you think anyone else is reading this spoiler?




_________________
http://www.neurovoice.org
An ASD inclusive peer-orientated space for social interaction and support, where the Autism Spectrum is the norm, all are welcome.
So you don't care about breaking the rules after someone else broke them first?
Precisely, Alex should add to the rules "no self defense, please use the mods against your attacker to get them into trouble."

Crap, I think I just tipped my enemies off on how to get rid of me.

That would be redundant, as it would translate to "no breaking rules, even if in (perceived) self defence."
We can of course make a heap of "no breaking rules" rules but it wouldn't change anything, would it?
There *has to* be some leeway.
The main thing is that decisions need to be equitable/impartial/consistent.
Yes, there has to be some leeway, we are living creatures, not digital machines (except of you, of course).
I was thinking about the "self defence" thing.
In real life, breaking law in self defence is permitted because you need to act immediately when your life, health or property is immediately threatned. If you didn't hit that guy with a knife, he could have broken your back before the police had time to do anything.
In internet communities, such situations are unlikely. No one's life, health or property is in immediate danger when you refrain from calling an idiot an idiot.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
Anyone else notice that while every criticism of Trump, fair or ludicrous, is allowed, even encouraged, any criticism of Biden is scrutinized?
In fact, if you begin to criticize the Democratic choice, certain moderators will materialize and begin to "put you in your place", something which I frankly had not noticed in the Trump threads.
Even worse...certain of the moderators will bait you, perhaps hoping to zap you later for some infraction. Here are examples:
...is misrepresentations of decades-old policies all you have?
...It’s not quite “Kamala Harris is bad because she might be descended from a slave owner” but it’s heading in that direction.
...Generally I find people raising the "you're not American" line end up embarrassing themselves in short order.
Now, I am not going to tussle with a moderator, no matter what their current status. So they "take off their hat" to engage in your thread, why would you argue with them knowing that they can zap you in a different thread? But this does not strike me as fair, especially since, as I have already noted, you can post literally anything negative about Donald Trump and nothing happens to you (except perhaps applause). And as a person that is fairly new to Wrong Planet, I found the "moderator" tussles to be disconcerting.
_________________
"We see the extent to which our pursuit of pleasure has been limited in large part by a vocabulary foisted upon us"

Great thread grampa

_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Future for walle |
22 May 2025, 6:11 pm |
Making Friends |
10 May 2025, 6:26 pm |
Short Film Making |
12 Jun 2025, 5:20 pm |
Making up for lost time |
27 Jun 2025, 1:14 am |