21 Oct 2007, 6:35 am
21 Oct 2007, 6:36 am
21 Oct 2007, 6:39 am
calandale wrote:
Quatermass wrote:
calandale wrote:
Hell, I'm sure that there'd be no interference at
ZOMG either. But, THAT would be as unlevel as
here. But I see little point to the debate where
'tis unlikely to be seen by the membership here,
nor by Alex. I'd just resort to ya momma jokes.
ZOMG either. But, THAT would be as unlevel as
here. But I see little point to the debate where
'tis unlikely to be seen by the membership here,
nor by Alex. I'd just resort to ya momma jokes.
I hope you're joking. You dare, and I will ban you. Regardless.
Some kind of 'special' relationship you don't want touched on?
You show up at either of the two sites, and that's ALL my comments
to you will consist of.
Hell, you have me damned near tempted to
force your petty hand on this.
I am not kidding. And if your definition of "special" relationship is anything but benign, I will do the whole [GM] Dave package on you.
21 Oct 2007, 6:40 am
21 Oct 2007, 6:42 am
21 Oct 2007, 6:43 am
Quatermass wrote:
I am not kidding. And if your definition of "special" relationship is anything but benign, I will do the whole [GM] Dave package on you.
My definition is what you reveal, of course.
Have your fun, big boy.
21 Oct 2007, 6:43 am
21 Oct 2007, 6:44 am
Quatermass wrote:
calandale wrote:
MrMark wrote:
calandale wrote:
'Tis the little things which are easily done, and not
noticed. Though, I do find it odd that Alex would choose
to maintain a mod staff essentially at disagreements with
his own views for running the site - one which drove all
the mods which agreed with him away, by one means or
another.
noticed. Though, I do find it odd that Alex would choose
to maintain a mod staff essentially at disagreements with
his own views for running the site - one which drove all
the mods which agreed with him away, by one means or
another.
That's BS.
Really? Four mods left after your resumption
of power. Two, banned due to actions that your
threats promoted. One, due to an argument over
how to handle a thread with you. And myself - you
were definitely the instigator of the actions which
led to my departure. And I believe that these four
mods came MUCH closer to Alex's instructions on
how the site was to be run.
While I don't know all the circumstances with Janicka's banning, Sopho and Starbuline were causing havoc. As for Alex's instructions, what bloody instructions? There were never any instructions. Show me these supposed instructions right here, right now, or stop going on about these mythical instructions.
calandale wrote:
MrMark wrote:
calandale wrote:
Quatermass wrote:
calandale wrote:
MrMark wrote:
thyme wrote:
^Look^, we're even using I2s icons now
Aw, but she was careful not to just use them
directly like I do.
As long as it ain't sexual, it's fine.
Where does this fall?
That's sexual innuendo.
No, 'tis LOVE. I swear!
Are you Welsh or Kiwi?
No racial stereotyping here then
Is this not an infringement of the TOS? Maybe I should report this to the Mods. *Laughs at the irony*
Oh well. Any popcorn left?
21 Oct 2007, 6:46 am
Starr wrote:
No racial stereotyping here then Is this not an infringement of the TOS? Maybe I should report this to the Mods. *Laughs at the irony*
Oh well. Any popcorn left?
Is this not an infringement of the TOS? Maybe I should report this to the Mods. *Laughs at the irony*Oh well. Any popcorn left?
Couldn't resist.
21 Oct 2007, 6:49 am
calandale wrote:
Quatermass wrote:
I am not kidding. And if your definition of "special" relationship is anything but benign, I will do the whole [GM] Dave package on you.
My definition is what you reveal, of course.Have your fun, big boy.
Bite me.
21 Oct 2007, 6:52 am
21 Oct 2007, 6:56 am
calandale wrote:
Show me your neck first.
And people give me curry for misinterpreting things too literally....
21 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
You don't like Indian food? 
21 Oct 2007, 7:15 am
calandale wrote:
You don't like Indian food?
I love butter chicken, actually, especially at one of my local restaurants.
21 Oct 2007, 7:20 am
21 Oct 2007, 7:24 am
