Page 130 of 162 [ 2587 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133 ... 162  Next

The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

23 Aug 2020, 6:33 pm

Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
But defending the use of the n-word while criticising the use of “racist”, or publicly opposing bullying while also participating in it - not fine.


Sorry about the first comment.

But if his quote is to believed it wasn't used in a racist way , he tried to equate his attack the same as racism , how is it racist to feel empathy for PoC who get called the 'N' word .

I have no idea what racism feels like but I sure know what defamation of my character feels like , that's what I'm critiscing.

I agree. This isn’t about Sly. I do think non-black using the N word can be appropriate in very limited circumstances (quotation where substitution is inappropriate, dramatic performances, and maybe in very close social circles). I think the specific use case that Alex criticised was inappropriate and insensitive but not necessarily indicative of racist intent.

(Equally, I can understand why Alex would be frustrated at discovering that sort of thing was being said)

What I do have a problem with is when people are not willing to consider context for a term like “racist” but are willing to consider it for that word. It’s a double standard.



IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,433
Location: Chez Quis

23 Aug 2020, 6:43 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
I don't hate anyone either. Nor am I avoiding the issue by having my PM off. That is a personal matter and unrelated to the issue at hand, so I'm sorry for any misunderstandings in that regard. The mods are aware of my reasons for keeping it off since the spring.

I have an idea, which I've stated before but I will state again in the interest of supporting Wrong Planet.

Can we please agree that the racial issues caused considerable divide, as well as considerable opportunity for this site to address key problems, and move toward a better future?

Can we please agree to put any tensions behind us, wipe the slate clean so to speak, and try again? I'm not saying that to dismiss anyone, or to negate the serious subject matter at hand, but I think everyone has aired their concerns and I hope we can all move forward, agreeing that racial or supremacist ideology is not allowed, rule breaks of any hurtful nature should be reported privately for moderation, and we won't continue calling people out or fighting about the past? I would encourage having no hard feelings toward anyone, or avoiding people politely if you simply must, for the sake of WP.

I for one would love this. We will have new moderators and it's a turning point for everything to feel like a fresh start.

Please add your name to this list if you think that this is possible.

Isabella Linton


I'm perfectly willing to move on, however I do feel you owe me an apology as I have felt bullied. Many of your attacks like referring to lyrics I've written or drama on another site are flat-out uncalled for and unfair. I don't expect one, but if I receive one I'd be happy to add my name to the list.


Could you please link the song for us? I mean that sincerely. There was no reference to it being a song and I'm curious to hear it. Maybe you could put it in the songs thread. I'm sorry if you felt bullied. I am a rule follower and I reported incidents which broke the rules. Most of the things I reported were slights against me in The Haven, and they were nothing to do with Sly. I think that you assumed I was WS because I was his friend. I felt mischaracterised, because I don't see him as WS and I'm certainly not. In fact our friendship is based on the fact we both have Complex Trauma and we are dealing with PTSD together, entirely unrelated to politics. I apologise that you didn't like to be reported. I wasn't trying to shame you, but it hurt to be called fragile, or to be mocked as racist when I left for PTSD therapy, and other incorrect assumptions.

Truce. Please add your name if you feel we can all move on.


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles


magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

23 Aug 2020, 6:50 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Both comments (you lay with dogs and you'll get fleas and sympathizing with white supremacists) were greatly exaggerated in order to work up the backlash I've received.

Thanks for making it clear. I think it's important.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Oh_no_its_Ferris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2020
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 728

23 Aug 2020, 6:51 pm

The_Walrus wrote:

What I do have a problem with is when people are not willing to consider context for a term like “racist” but are willing to consider it for that word. It’s a double standard.


You mean like Alex's comment.


_________________
Release me from moral assumption
Total rejection total destruction


Oh_no_its_Ferris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2020
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 728

23 Aug 2020, 7:04 pm

IsabellaLinton wrote:
I don't hate anyone either. Nor am I avoiding the issue by having my PM off. That is a personal matter and unrelated to the issue at hand, so I'm sorry for any misunderstandings in that regard. The mods are aware of my reasons for keeping it off since the spring.

I have an idea, which I've stated before but I will state again in the interest of supporting Wrong Planet.

Can we please agree that the racial issues caused considerable divide, as well as considerable opportunity for this site to address key problems, and move toward a better future?

Can we please agree to put any tensions behind us, wipe the slate clean so to speak, and try again? I'm not saying that to dismiss anyone, or to negate the serious subject matter at hand, but I think everyone has aired their concerns and I hope we can all move forward, agreeing that racial or supremacist ideology is not allowed, rule breaks of any hurtful nature should be reported privately for moderation, and we won't continue calling people out or fighting about the past? I would encourage having no hard feelings toward anyone, or avoiding people politely if you simply must, for the sake of WP.

I for one would love this. We will have new moderators and it's a turning point for everything to feel like a fresh start.

Please add your name to this list if you think that this is possible.

Isabella Linton


I think I've said all I can on the matter and maybe too much but I can't help/won't apologise for being me , I can't f*****g change it's systemic :jester:

I shall retire for the night and add my name to that list


_________________
Release me from moral assumption
Total rejection total destruction


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,223
Location: Right over your left shoulder

23 Aug 2020, 7:11 pm

IsabellaLinton wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
I don't hate anyone either. Nor am I avoiding the issue by having my PM off. That is a personal matter and unrelated to the issue at hand, so I'm sorry for any misunderstandings in that regard. The mods are aware of my reasons for keeping it off since the spring.

I have an idea, which I've stated before but I will state again in the interest of supporting Wrong Planet.

Can we please agree that the racial issues caused considerable divide, as well as considerable opportunity for this site to address key problems, and move toward a better future?

Can we please agree to put any tensions behind us, wipe the slate clean so to speak, and try again? I'm not saying that to dismiss anyone, or to negate the serious subject matter at hand, but I think everyone has aired their concerns and I hope we can all move forward, agreeing that racial or supremacist ideology is not allowed, rule breaks of any hurtful nature should be reported privately for moderation, and we won't continue calling people out or fighting about the past? I would encourage having no hard feelings toward anyone, or avoiding people politely if you simply must, for the sake of WP.

I for one would love this. We will have new moderators and it's a turning point for everything to feel like a fresh start.

Please add your name to this list if you think that this is possible.

Isabella Linton


I'm perfectly willing to move on, however I do feel you owe me an apology as I have felt bullied. Many of your attacks like referring to lyrics I've written or drama on another site are flat-out uncalled for and unfair. I don't expect one, but if I receive one I'd be happy to add my name to the list.


Could you please link the song for us? I mean that sincerely. There was no reference to it being a song and I'm curious to hear it. Maybe you could put it in the songs thread. I'm sorry if you felt bullied. I am a rule follower and I reported incidents which broke the rules. Most of the things I reported were slights against me in The Haven, and they were nothing to do with Sly. I think that you assumed I was WS because I was his friend. I felt mischaracterised, because I don't see him as WS and I'm certainly not. In fact our friendship is based on the fact we both have Complex Trauma and we are dealing with PTSD together, entirely unrelated to politics. I apologise that you didn't like to be reported. I wasn't trying to shame you, but it hurt to be called fragile, or to be mocked as racist when I left for PTSD therapy, and other incorrect assumptions.

Truce. Please add your name if you feel we can all move on.


Having suffered complex emotional traumas is something that the three of us have in common, and same with many other posters on here. That's part of why I've been consistent in saying he's got every right to be here no matter what he believes. It also explains why when I feel piled on I tend to respond forcefully as long as it occurs. We all have maladaptive tendencies resulting from traumas we've been subjected to, one of mine is that I always fight back even if I can't win because I carry a lot more shame over situations where I didn't do that than the ones where I did.

I don't doubt that I was harsher than deserved because of the circumstances but I also believe some of the offense was driven by not quite reading what I had said. I don't recall ever calling you a coddled racist, but I do recall saying you were coddling one, I should have been more strict with my wording and wrote out 'someone who's been sympathizing with WS groups' or something more reasonable, but in the heat of the moment I was lazy and unclear. I can absolutely understand being much more upset over your take than mine.

It might be unreasonable for me to expect perfect reading comprehension in that moment, just like I would feel it's unfair to insist that lazy wordings were intentionally malicious, tensions were high and clearly we're both people who felt strongly motivated to defend 'our cause'.

I've got a thread titled 'Rate My Bars', I assumed any threats were contained in there although I've probably posted little snippets elsewhere if I thought they were clever. One of the things I'm really fixated on is the craft of rapping, so at times something I'm proud of (like strings of multisyllable rhymes) isn't related to the content but instead the just the rhyme scheme. I know I've used 'deplorable racists' and 'hospital patients' as a rhyme because the stressed syllables rhyme.

I can link some stuff, I have before. I've had to learn how to actually mix and engineer tracks in this style since I've only made heavy/noisy punk before so I have very little recorded compared to written. Usually when I get to rap it's with other people at work, just basically coming up with rhymes for fun. Part of the reason I post stuff here is that I can open the thread with my phone and have way more stuff than I could ever remember handy.

https://vocaroo.com/ghgqTUN5UJF

That's an example, but I'm going to rerecord my verse (the first one). People were in bed, so I had to be quiet.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning. — Warren Buffett


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,223
Location: Right over your left shoulder

23 Aug 2020, 7:12 pm

Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:

What I do have a problem with is when people are not willing to consider context for a term like “racist” but are willing to consider it for that word. It’s a double standard.


You mean like Alex's comment.


I think he means more like Pepe, where that word is viewed as a horrific attack beyond all decency.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning. — Warren Buffett


Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

23 Aug 2020, 7:15 pm

Drake wrote:
AuroraBorealisGazer wrote:
smudge wrote:
Wolfram87 wrote:
Feyokien wrote:
Oh_no_its_Ferris wrote:
You are a high profile member of the autistic community so may have so clout and influence and have openly declared one of the members here racist ( with your personal view of racism and language usage ) which could have detrimental effects.

I personally think you are bang out of order and need to retract that statement and apologise for the mistake.


I agree with this statement firmly.


As do I.


+ 1.


+1

Brave words, Ferris. I stand with you.

+1



Drake
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,577

23 Aug 2020, 7:19 pm

A couple of things to clarify, I don't think we should ban the word "racist" (I don't think we should ban any words) and I'm not after funeralxempire's proverbial head. This thread and the Sly stuff I have only come across today, when I entered this part of the forum to express gratitude about the huge improvement in performance speed of the site.

As for Isabella's post, I don't have any animosity towards anyone on the site, so no worries there.



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

23 Aug 2020, 8:06 pm

Do you think we should stick to something implicitly contained in the existing rules but unfortunately too often overlooked:

Calling out for bad things and other forms of disagreement should never follow a user to The Haven. Even if they was the most awful person in the world cleverly disguising their genocidal agenda - The Haven is sacred. In The Haven, support or report but don't challenge.

Can we all agree on it and keep to it from now on?


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,433
Location: Chez Quis

23 Aug 2020, 8:11 pm

magz wrote:
Do you think we should stick to something implicitly contained in the existing rules but unfortunately too often overlooked:

Calling out for bad things and other forms of disagreement should never follow a user to The Haven. Even if they was the most awful person in the world cleverly disguising their genocidal agenda - The Haven is sacred.

Can we all agree on it and keep to it from now on?


That was always my understanding, and my reason for requesting mod support in nine different instances.
People with trauma, depression, and anxiety need a lot more protection from hurtful comments.

This is how I tried to enforce the rules for the best interest of everyone's mental health.

The Haven.
The Haven is protected more than any other forum on this site, so if someone is in distress and posts there it is for help and support from other members, not to debate with him/her about their religion or atheism or post anything that could cause further distress. Trying to persuade an atheist to pray to God or Jesus for support is not appropriate in the Haven, similarly attacking a believers religious views in the Haven is not appropriate either.


This is the current rule, posted in The Haven. ^


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles


Oh_no_its_Ferris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2020
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 728

23 Aug 2020, 8:18 pm

I've said it before but I will say it again a new rule was implemented for the The Haven in my era as a mod but it seems to have disappeared.


_________________
Release me from moral assumption
Total rejection total destruction


blooiejagwa
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Dec 2017
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,793

23 Aug 2020, 8:28 pm

Thank you for bringing back

spoilers

the Html way wasn't working till just now...


_________________
Take defeat as an urge to greater effort.
-Napoleon Hill


Jakki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,921
Location: Outter Quadrant

23 Aug 2020, 8:32 pm

Dear Ferris. Your new icon , does not look good on you... might even appear a bit inflammatory ? but this is most likely just my opinion .


_________________
Diagnosed hfa
Loves velcro,
Quote:
where ever you go ,there you are


Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

23 Aug 2020, 8:37 pm

alex wrote:
While of course people in other countries may be unaware of these things, i think it’s their responsibility to look into the history if they’re going to argue whether or not someone is racist.


In the same way, it should be the responsibility for those in America to consider how the use of terms like "racist" or "white supremecist" apply in other countries (or even just outside the bubbles the person using those terms lives in), and how these can be considered extremely offensive, and a major attack on a person's character and integrity.

Unfortunately, it appears that throwing these terms around to describe anyone with a different opinion has become the acceptable (approved even?) practice here. It also appears that it is endorsed here in place of a civil "I disgaree with what you said because <insert explanation>", which only serves to indicate the disdain shown to anyone who may have even slightly different beliefs to you.



Oh_no_its_Ferris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2020
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 728

23 Aug 2020, 8:40 pm

blooiejagwa wrote:
Thank you for bringing back
spoilers

the Html way wasn't working till just now...


You seem to be under the impression that the things you post in a spoiler are not relevant, please don't censor yourself like that.

Off Topic
you could always use use the offtopic tag if you think it's off topic but I don't think anyone minds


_________________
Release me from moral assumption
Total rejection total destruction