Page 3 of 8 [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next


Is something bad going on here?
Yes - it looks weird and no one is trying to explain it 55%  55%  [ 11 ]
No - you are paranoid 20%  20%  [ 4 ]
Don't know - but it sure looks odd 25%  25%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 20

0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

25 May 2007, 4:23 am

Right I have done a search so it is a bit clearer what alyssa is talking about. Though I don't really know the nature of what was sent. Maybe alex just felt he was doing his job. He may have been wrong but I don't doubt he was acting with integrity. I'm under no illusion that any content I post on a site can be reviewed. That's what all the ToT essentially say. I just wouldn't want it to be for no good reason. Like i said I don't know the background but resorting to pm to argue a point is not advisable. Do it out in the open.

In balance alex said back then that this was primarily an American site. I would hope that that has changed. I feel it is quite international and I hope that alex would consider it to be.



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

25 May 2007, 5:20 am

bizarre wrote:
I don't want your **cough, cough** help Calendale. I bumped my thread so Alex could see it NOT YOU. You had no right to lock it. I wanted to make sure Alex see's it because now Bazza's Account has also been hacked. Right after he had that run in with you.


Understood. But some reference to the bazza issue would have
made that clear. What do you expect us to think, with a snide
BUMP?

Anyhow, THIS thread should serve whatever value that yours
was attempting. And most of the flack is directed at me, which
just makes me giddy with pleasure. :P



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

25 May 2007, 5:21 am

aylissa wrote:
The message is: send your email address to people you trust if you want to communicate privately, and don't believe the word "Private" in Private Message. It's not.


Yep. At least one member here has some serious complaints about
the reading of PM's. And that's all I'm aware of. AFAIK, we are unable
to do this.



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

25 May 2007, 5:26 am

0_equals_true wrote:
Bizzare: if someone wanted to hack your pm they are going the wrong way about it. It is unlikely that that is the case. If they had access they would do much worse than just mess with one person pm's. The PM system is not a particularly sophisticated. It looks like it is a bug specific to phpBB. Google "65,535 new messages" Actually if is probably that it has mistakenly deleted from 0 messages as you would have -1 messages. But the counter is likely to be stored as an unsigned integer with a maximum of 16 bits so the count would default to 65,535. It is probably due to some bug in a mail filtering system if there is one. Or I'm not sure if it is possible to retract something you've sent. In any case I seriously doubt it is malicious.


Given that both bizarre and bazza have had problems, I suspect
it's something more nefarious than some random bug. Just what,
I am lacking enough knowledge of this BBS to tell. But, it would
be possible to set up an account and automatically fill a PM box
with messages. Investigation of the particular server (no doubt
a proxy), MIGHT give some clue as to the culprit - but my guess
is that it shall remain unknown.



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

25 May 2007, 5:27 am

shadexiii wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
I'm not sure the moderators can actually keep an eye on what the other moderators are up to. It better that they don't take the decision lightly to appoint one. Common sense really.

I'm not talking about moderators. I'm talking about admins. Rather, admin. Only one has the power to read PMs.


As far as I know, this is correct.



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

25 May 2007, 5:28 am

0_equals_true wrote:
In balance alex said back then that this was primarily an American site. I would hope that that has changed. I feel it is quite international and I hope that alex would consider it to be.


The site is still based in the US, and is subject
to laws here. Which are not as free as they used
to be, or as in many other countries in the world.



Graelwyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,601
Location: Hants, Uk

25 May 2007, 5:36 am

Quatermass wrote:
aylissa wrote:
BazzaMcKenzie wrote:
Bizarre asked why/how/who appeared to hack into her inbox

still waiting for an explaination ...... is someone (trying to) get unauthosied access into private messages?
?


Since I don't care if I get banned I will risk all by telling some history. About a year ago, it was found that a certain administrator not only had access to all members' PM's, but was READING them.

There was a big to-do, almost all of the mods at the time either were banned because they dared to raise a fuss or left because they were so, well, righteously pissed.

The message is: send your email address to people you trust if you want to communicate privately, and don't believe the word "Private" in Private Message. It's not.


GACK! Scary. 8O


Had heard of this already.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

25 May 2007, 5:46 am

calandale wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
Bizzare: if someone wanted to hack your pm they are going the wrong way about it. It is unlikely that that is the case. If they had access they would do much worse than just mess with one person pm's. The PM system is not a particularly sophisticated. It looks like it is a bug specific to phpBB. Google "65,535 new messages" Actually if is probably that it has mistakenly deleted from 0 messages as you would have -1 messages. But the counter is likely to be stored as an unsigned integer with a maximum of 16 bits so the count would default to 65,535. It is probably due to some bug in a mail filtering system if there is one. Or I'm not sure if it is possible to retract something you've sent. In any case I seriously doubt it is malicious.


Given that both bizarre and bazza have had problems, I suspect
it's something more nefarious than some random bug. Just what,
I am lacking enough knowledge of this BBS to tell. But, it would
be possible to set up an account and automatically fill a PM box
with messages. Investigation of the particular server (no doubt
a proxy), MIGHT give some clue as to the culprit - but my guess
is that it shall remain unknown.


Well I do have some knowledge of bbs and it still is more feasible that it is bug though I could be wrong. Not of bugs are common. Some bugs are extremely difficult to replicate. It is not to do with filling up messages I seriously doubt that.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

25 May 2007, 5:47 am

calandale wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
In balance alex said back then that this was primarily an American site. I would hope that that has changed. I feel it is quite international and I hope that alex would consider it to be.


The site is still based in the US, and is subject
to laws here. Which are not as free as they used
to be, or as in many other countries in the world.


That's not what I was saying. It was talking about the audience.



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

25 May 2007, 5:48 am

Given the particular members targeted,
I would assume that it is NOT a bug.



TheMachine1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.

25 May 2007, 5:51 am

shadexiii wrote:
Rather than referencing Amazon in a thread where others have responded, why not fix problems with the site?



If Alex could fix all the problems he would. Also he has ADHD like alot people here and he is at its mercy on what he can focus on.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

25 May 2007, 5:51 am

calandale wrote:
Given the particular members targeted,
I would assume that it is NOT a bug.

Ok but be objective. You need to go through a sequence of events with all them members involved. Even if it was deliberate that doesn't mean it wasn't exploiting a bug. The count is actually fairly insignificant if not an annoying badly designed feature. They actually didn’t receive that many messages in their inbox.



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

25 May 2007, 6:03 am

0_equals_true wrote:
calandale wrote:
Given the particular members targeted,
I would assume that it is NOT a bug.

Ok but be objective. You need to go through a sequence of events with all them members involved. Even if it was deliberate that doesn't mean it wasn't exploiting a bug. The count is actually fairly insignificant if not an annoying badly designed feature. They actually didn’t receive that many messages in their inbox.


Sure. Someone might have discovered,
and exploited a bug. No problem. All that
I'm saying is that it was clearly deliberate.

As to who, I have no reason to trust anyone.



Graelwyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,601
Location: Hants, Uk

25 May 2007, 6:07 am

Am I the only one who has noticed that both times/days this pm issue occurred a certain spammer was also spamming the site up?



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

25 May 2007, 6:10 am

Interesting. Odd that atomika
would be clever enough to
exploit that, on it's own.



Graelwyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,601
Location: Hants, Uk

25 May 2007, 6:20 am

He may not be, it is just something I realised last night with all that spamming etc.
Thought I would mention it.