Page 28 of 162 [ 2587 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 162  Next

League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

04 Aug 2020, 3:09 pm

sly279 wrote:
Mountain Goat wrote:
I have seen some rules and I think "How is it possible to remain on this site without breaking at least one of them?" I don't try to, but it depends how strict they are applied. I read the last bit in blue. Direct or not etc. (How does one know if one has indirectly broken rules by saying something that means one thing to me but something completely different to someone else?)
I tend to fear breaking rules and I have left sites or other things which to me seem difficult to keep as the wording may be seen by some to be words that mean a more general meaning, but to me they mean exactly what they say.


What we have is someone knownly directly violating the rules and saying I don’t care if they ban me for it.

You’d rather have no rules? I’m currently leaning to thst. Currently the rules are only enforced on non left leaning people. Atleast if there’s no rules I could fight back.

I can’t even be left alone being mute in a single thread on the forum. No that’s not enough. This is the single most worse forum on the internet

Whenever I show people wp they all say “wow that’s a horrible site why do you go there. Sure doesn’t look like a support site.”



There is actually a form called intensity squared. That is where members would go when they felt censored here. Lot of members banned from here would go there.

Is it possible to get banned from there? Yeah but you would have to spam or threaten the forum.

I wouldn't recommend going there for if you can't handle being attacked since there are no rules there. BTW the right wing do believe in freedom of speech and believe it's right for people to bully and attack others because of freedom of speech and you just need a thick skin to ignore it and if you are being harassed, go to your boss or something.

I hear they do not have any politics on Aspies Central I think is now called Autism Forums. I would recommend that place than I2. Lot of WP members have seem to have gone there from here because they felt the same way.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder

04 Aug 2020, 3:14 pm

magz wrote:
Funeralxempire is generally sensitive to anything even slightly resembling white supremacism.


Mostly I'm frustrated that a community that has generally been subjected to bullying and gaslighting personally at some point in their lifetimes are so willing to engage in those behaviours in some contexts, like when someone's been a victim of police brutality and immediately posters justify it with stereotypes or when yet again indigenous people are protesting misuse of their land and posters insist that we're backwards and just need to accept that other people know what's best. This is common enough that it's sometimes hard to tell if it's just a consistent reaction or if it's a broader attitude towards black and indigenous causes. It might be both depending on the specific individual. Then when you bring this up you're gaslit about it and bullied if you refuse to stop bringing it up.

To be fair, this experience isn't just limited to this forum, it's basically been my experience in 'working class' circles my entire adult/working life. It's not even entirely the fault of the posters spewing ignorance, our school system makes no real effort to teach black or indigenous history, or a broader view of colonialism so of course most of us just accept the indoctrination. Of course we can't discuss the massive thefts that colonialism was built upon without triggering apologists so acknowledging this racist legacy or it's modern effects is unlikely to ever happen.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


envirozentinel
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,226
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria

04 Aug 2020, 3:14 pm

a) Alex must just fix the bugs on this site because half the time I am getting Error 524 messages and pages that are very slow to respond. If the software and admin can be fixed on here, WP will be a pleasure again. Having problems viewing a PM that someone sent me - had to take a screenshot of my response as it wouldn't go through, will try again later. These intermittent gremlins make it very difficult for the mods to work effectively.

b) the truth lies somewhere in the middle, Sly. Of course we need to enforce rules but without being too strict either. No rules imply anarchy and that won't work. On the other hand, if certain ideas are attacked, that doesn't imply a personal attack. No names have been mentioned!

Sly, I do think certain members have gone too far in their description of what constitutes white supremacy. And I believe that if you saw someone in real life being attacked just because they were Black and vulnerable, you'd be one of the first to come to their assistance. All lives matter.


_________________
Why is a trailer behind a car but ahead of a movie?


my blog:
https://sentinel63.wordpress.com/


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder

04 Aug 2020, 3:16 pm

B.Sisko wrote:
sly279 wrote:
What we have is someone knownly directly violating the rules and saying I don’t care if they ban me for it.


that about sums it for me


I don't believe I am breaking the rules, but if I am I will deal with whatever consequences ensue.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


Deepthought 7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2018
Posts: 916
Location: United Kingdom

04 Aug 2020, 3:17 pm

sly279 wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
Maybe it would just be better if Alex made a new rule saying "no calling anyone out on their racism, white supremacy, etc but disagreeing is fine but no calling them that" because of different perspectives. It's hard to enforce the rule when everyone comes from different backgrounds and has different interpretations and different perspectives. But if you make a specific rule like that, it's easier to enforce.

Of course the next thing you know, people would still be accused of breaking that rule because someone can say they were called that even if the person didn't literally say it.

Not everyone sees it as an attack to calling someone out on their racism or white supremacy if spade is a spade. This is also part of the advocacy and activism too for people of color. To support them, you need to call people out on their racism and white supremacy so they are made aware because society had ingrained that into them. So the "no personal attacks" rule is hard to follow due to different perspectives. Or another rule can be added, no advocating for minorities. :lol:

Just read books about it like White Fragility by Robin DiAngelo and Me and White Supremacy by Layla F Saad. They even mention the same thing that you must call people out on it and they are fragile when they get offended and get defensive.

I kept thinking, of course they get defensive when they think they are being accused. No one likes to get accused. People care more about intentions than actions so they get defensive when they are told that is racist or white supremacy.

Racism is a very fragile topic.



2. Personal attacks.
This includes insinuation, ridicule and personal insults, regardless of whether direct or indirect. Attacking an opinion, belief or philosophy is acceptable, but attacking the person making the comments is not.


Your compliance is very much appreciated as it is universally required. Thankyou everyone. :D


_________________
I reserve the right or is it left to at very least be wrong :)


Last edited by envirozentinel on 04 Aug 2020, 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.: the original post was deleted so reference to it must be deleted too

B.Sisko
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2020
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 171

04 Aug 2020, 3:20 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
B.Sisko wrote:
sly279 wrote:
What we have is someone knownly directly violating the rules and saying I don’t care if they ban me for it.


that about sums it for me


I don't believe I am breaking the rules, but if I am I will deal with whatever consequences ensue.


the only consequence i want is it to be stopped

which i know is cheeky for a 4 day old member


_________________
It is far better for people to hate you for doing the right thing than for people to love you for doing the wrong thing. Never ever forget that.


Last edited by B.Sisko on 04 Aug 2020, 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Deepthought 7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2018
Posts: 916
Location: United Kingdom

04 Aug 2020, 3:22 pm

magz wrote:
Can someone explain to me, what are you so angry about? I gather, it's something from other threads?

If you gave a reference to that which you were referring ~ the person in question would be in a better position than anyone else to answer your question perhaps magz?


_________________
I reserve the right or is it left to at very least be wrong :)


magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

04 Aug 2020, 3:23 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
magz wrote:
Funeralxempire is generally sensitive to anything even slightly resembling white supremacism.


Mostly I'm frustrated that a community that has generally been subjected to bullying and gaslighting personally at some point in their lifetimes are so willing to engage in those behaviours in some contexts, like when someone's been a victim of police brutality and immediately posters justify it with stereotypes or when yet again indigenous people are protesting misuse of their land and posters insist that we're backwards and just need to accept that other people know what's best. This is common enough that it's sometimes hard to tell if it's just a consistent reaction or if it's a broader attitude towards black and indigenous causes. It might be both depending on the specific individual. Then when you bring this up you're gaslit about it and bullied if you refuse to stop bringing it up.

To be fair, this experience isn't just limited to this forum, it's basically been my experience in 'working class' circles my entire adult/working life. It's not even entirely the fault of the posters spewing ignorance, our school system makes no real effort to teach black or indigenous history, or a broader view of colonialism so of course most of us just accept the indoctrination. Of course we can't discuss the massive thefts that colonialism was built upon without triggering apologists so acknowledging this racist legacy or it's modern effects is unlikely to ever happen.

I agree almost all colonial history is awful (probably easier for me because, while "white", I'm also indigenous ;) ) and the consequences are still there. We should learn more for better future.
I'm sorry if I sounded dismissive. I was just trying to understand why Sly was so upset.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder

04 Aug 2020, 3:25 pm

envirozentinel wrote:
Sly, I do think certain members have gone too far in their description of what constitutes white supremacy. And I believe that if you saw someone in real life being attacked just because they were Black and vulnerable, you'd be one of the first to come to their assistance. All lives matter.


There were pro-segregationists who were appalled by the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing. I don't wish to suggest Sly is anything similar in character to pro-segregationists, but even those people had some standards of human decency motivated by empathy, it doesn't change what they believed or how they perceive the value of people, or of those people's direct interests.

Your argument is dishonest in the same way well, I have a black friend is. Even if it weren't a hypothetical it would still prove very little.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

04 Aug 2020, 3:27 pm

Deepthought 7 wrote:
magz wrote:
Can someone explain to me, what are you so angry about? I gather, it's something from other threads?

If you gave a reference to that which you were referring ~ the person in question would be in a better position than anyone else to answer your question perhaps magz?

You plural. Everyone engaged in the heated exchange.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder

04 Aug 2020, 3:29 pm

magz wrote:
I agree almost all colonial history is awful (probably easier for me because, while "white", I'm also indigenous ;) ) and the consequences are still there. We should learn more for better future.
I'm sorry if I sounded dismissive. I was just trying to understand why Sly was so upset.


A little, but just like with a lot of other posters I have an understanding of where you stand and what you've said before so while I felt the need to explain myself I wasn't really taking the 'dismissiveness' as a slight, since you seemed like the goal was being concise, not purposefully dismissive.

I think I've mentioned finding Poland or Ireland's place in that whole mess interesting because it's less clear cut than say England or Spain or France.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder

04 Aug 2020, 3:31 pm

magz wrote:
Deepthought 7 wrote:
magz wrote:
Can someone explain to me, what are you so angry about? I gather, it's something from other threads?

If you gave a reference to that which you were referring ~ the person in question would be in a better position than anyone else to answer your question perhaps magz?

You plural. Everyone engaged in the heated exchange.


Well, I'm a bit frustrated that several posters seem to be begging the mods to punish me for speaking my opinion.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


Teach51
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,808
Location: Where angels do not fear to tread.

04 Aug 2020, 3:31 pm

League_Girl wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Mountain Goat wrote:
I have seen some rules and I think "How is it possible to remain on this site without breaking at least one of them?" I don't try to, but it depends how strict they are applied. I read the last bit in blue. Direct or not etc. (How does one know if one has indirectly broken rules by saying something that means one thing to me but something completely different to someone else?)
I tend to fear breaking rules and I have left sites or other things which to me seem difficult to keep as the wording may be seen by some to be words that mean a more general meaning, but to me they mean exactly what they say.


What we have is someone knownly directly violating the rules and saying I don’t care if they ban me for it.

You’d rather have no rules? I’m currently leaning to thst. Currently the rules are only enforced on non left leaning people. Atleast if there’s no rules I could fight back.

I can’t even be left alone being mute in a single thread on the forum. No that’s not enough. This is the single most worse forum on the internet

Whenever I show people wp they all say “wow that’s a horrible site why do you go there. Sure doesn’t look like a support site.”



There is actually a form called intensity squared. That is where members would go when they felt censored here. Lot of members banned from here would go there.

Is it possible to get banned from there? Yeah but you would have to spam or threaten the forum.

I wouldn't recommend going there for if you can't handle being attacked since there are no rules there. BTW the right wing do believe in freedom of speech and believe it's right for people to bully and attack others because of freedom of speech and you just need a thick skin to ignore it and if you are being harassed, go to your boss or something.

I hear they do not have any politics on Aspies Central I think is now called Autism Forums. I would recommend that place than I2. Lot of WP members have seem to have gone there from here because they felt the same way.



They do have politics on Aspergers and Autism Forums. You have to request permission to be enabled to participate and if you don't want it then you have no access. They ask what your political affiliation is in advance.
There are many many ex WP's there and some who still participate
here also :D


_________________
My best will just have to be good enough.


Last edited by Teach51 on 04 Aug 2020, 3:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

envirozentinel
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,226
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria

04 Aug 2020, 3:33 pm

(Mod note) Cool it please - I'll have no choice but to lock it if it goes so far off course as to head for space. No more getting personal, stick to the facts, opinions and suggestions. This was never meant to become another free-for-all or it would be in PPR.

Specific posts can be reported if you feel they break the rules but frankly I prefer PMs (to any of the mods) or use Mod Attention thread, as the regular reports get snowed under like an online laundry basket and things don't get attended to in time. The sheer volume of posts here means we can easily miss something. We need to enforce rules, but neither do we want to be heavy handed censors out to erase everyone's colouring books...

Thanks to those who are sticking to the point and providing useful input.


_________________
Why is a trailer behind a car but ahead of a movie?


my blog:
https://sentinel63.wordpress.com/


BenderRodriguez
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,343

04 Aug 2020, 3:46 pm

envirozentinel wrote:
(Mod note) Cool it please - I'll have no choice but to lock it if it goes so far off course as to head for space. No more getting personal, stick to the facts, opinions and suggestions. This was never meant to become another free-for-all or it would be in PPR.


If things degenerate, could you please remove what crosses the line and keep the thread open enviro?

Sometimes people stir things up and maybe deliberately get threads locked, and from where I'm standing some posters are still trying to use this one with the best of intentions.

Thank you


_________________
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley


Teach51
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,808
Location: Where angels do not fear to tread.

04 Aug 2020, 3:52 pm

I do think that choosing to focus on support for autism and related issues rather than politics would stop the massive migration from here. There must be endless political forums elsewhere but few that support autism.

Even this thread has become a political arena.
Separating the political forum completely and isolating the conflicts to a restricted arena may be WP's salvation. It's in your face constantly even if you try your best to avoid it.


_________________
My best will just have to be good enough.