Why are people just so open about illegality on this board?
There was such a group. They been thrown out, for their tactics, not their position. I suggested to them that they and their supporters band together and petition Alex for change. They chose less honorable tactics and got banned.
I now make the same suggestion to you. Bring your supporters together and petition Alex for change. I don't mean people who joined yesterday, I mean well-established members. If you don't feel he's hearing you, let me know and I'll make sure he hears you. There was recently a shift towards greater enforcement of the rules. Perhaps you're correct and a shift towards even greater enforcement of the rules is called for by the segment of the membership that is in the middle of the social/political spectrum. It certainly would make my job easier.
_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson
The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,357
Location: Looking down on humanity
Don't be so self-righteous, ShadeXIII. I've seen what you've said to some people on zOMG and you going off at Pandora for exprssing her point of view seems a little hypocritical. Just accept that we are ALL the same and get on with whatever discussion without carrying on like a two-bob watch. Oh, and BTW, there were probably some things I may have agreed with over there, but here I think you crossed the line.
_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!
Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.
I asked for clarification on two points, and I expressed my views.
We are not all "the same," but we should all be treated equally. There is a difference.
Then there's something we disagree on. It is rare for two people to agree on everything. As for the hypocritical part, I can only assume that it was regarding the comment on accusations without the accused being aware. If you looked at my posts there, you'd find that I've not done that in some time, at least to my knowledge. More than that, several people that I once had expressed problems with over there I now have a lot of respect for.
The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,357
Location: Looking down on humanity
That's good to see. I can't exactly speak for what Pandora was saying, although I think I get the gist of it, and with the diagnosis thing, it could be that wwhile some people say they are self-diagnosed, and others say they have a medical diagnosis, there are some people who think that one or the other are better than the other, and thus they look down their nose at those that they consider different. Same with Aspies and NTs; I've seen comments by some Aspies that imply that thaey are more superior than NTs because of their condition, and these are very blatant remarks. Now, I don't really see any difference because to me everyone is the same, whether they be Aspie, NT, self-diagnosed or medically-diagnosed. The only thing is, as I said earlier, is that in an employment situation, a boss might prefer a doctor's letter to explain the condition in case of a meltdown, and to back up the diagnosis in case of OH&S and insurance. They may not see self-diagnosis as a definitive proof that their employee has AS, and thus may think the meltdown is a put-on. Get me? Anyway, if that's not quite it, she will explain.
_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!
Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.
Hah, I think we're back to agreeing on things. That was why I had an issue with it, that I didn't see why it would be necessary, at least in the context here, to bring up being officially diagnosed. I do not know her views on such things, so I didn't want to just openly accuse her of viewing individuals without a professional diagnosis as being less, in some way or another, though I suppose I could have done a bit better job expressing that. This is something that's really important to me, the issue of people viewing others as their equals, be it any of the cases you brought up, AS / NT, professional diagnosis / self-diagnosis, any of it. I've probably made some people sick of it by now, from at times commenting that one (or several) NT is not a good representative of all NTs.
I also appreciate the employment side of things, that's why I've considered forcing myself to go back to a professional, and a specialist for that matter, in case I have similar difficulties on the job that I had during college and before. But, I'm just not ready to give seeing a psychiatrist or psychologist another shot quite yet. Even the knowledge that it would be a specialist hasn't really helped, since the experience should be different, and it is only logical to assume that they would be better trained for it, but if I was an entirely logical creature I wouldn't check my fridge to see if my cat got shut in it nearly every time I get something out of there. -___-
I probably should have also held off until I had slept for a bit, but if I wasn't browsing the forums I had no idea what I'd be able to do to pass the time while I dealt with insomnia.
shadexiii,
You said;
The important thing here is that Pandora mentioned that she felt harassed. That should have been the clue to let up on her. It's obvious that the two of you won't find a middle ground in this case, so there's probably no need to continue arguing about it - there won't be a winner.
I didn't like the fact that Pandora brought her diagnosis into the argument because I know there's a lot of diagnosed vs undiagnosed contention at WP and I couldn't see how the statement would help.
We all type things in that we regret after hitting submit - I just assumed that once Pandora realized how the statement would be interpreted she thought oops. Note that she hasn't brought it up again - just tried to defend herself.
I'm not sure what the solution to the "real" problem of whether or not to post certain material in forums. Perhaps if some sort of agreement could be reached - maybe exclude certain topics from RSS?
I know that there's a "women's forum" which may or may not be locked down - I've never tried to access it. Maybe there needs to be a "pervert's forum" - ok perhaps not that particular name.
Pandora: If WP had to have the "sniggering boys behind the toilet" forums, what do you think they would need to do to make sure they didn't offend?
It seems to me that Pandora as well as other people might find some subjects to be very offensive to them, while it might not be like that to most, and those are not considered offensive or a bad thing according to the current rules.
I believe what Alex described of what is permisible and what is not, it is great, because it makes the site flexible, and there is actually some freedom to talk about some issues.
Having more restricted rules on what subjects to be allowed and what not, that would damage the site, now that the goal is to gain more members and more awareness.
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
There was such a group. They been thrown out, for their tactics, not their position. I suggested to them that they and their supporters band together and petition Alex for change. They chose less honorable tactics and got banned.
I now make the same suggestion to you. Bring your supporters together and petition Alex for change. I don't mean people who joined yesterday, I mean well-established members. If you don't feel he's hearing you, let me know and I'll make sure he hears you. There was recently a shift towards greater enforcement of the rules. Perhaps you're correct and a shift towards even greater enforcement of the rules is called for by the segment of the membership that is in the middle of the social/political spectrum. It certainly would make my job easier.
_________________
Break out you Western girls,
Someday soon you're gonna rule the world.
Break out you Western girls,
Hold your heads up high.
"Western Girls" - Dragon
You said;
The important thing here is that Pandora mentioned that she felt harassed. That should have been the clue to let up on her. It's obvious that the two of you won't find a middle ground in this case, so there's probably no need to continue arguing about it - there won't be a winner.
I didn't like the fact that Pandora brought her diagnosis into the argument because I know there's a lot of diagnosed vs undiagnosed contention at WP and I couldn't see how the statement would help.
We all type things in that we regret after hitting submit - I just assumed that once Pandora realized how the statement would be interpreted she thought oops. Note that she hasn't brought it up again - just tried to defend herself.
I'm not sure what the solution to the "real" problem of whether or not to post certain material in forums. Perhaps if some sort of agreement could be reached - maybe exclude certain topics from RSS?
I know that there's a "women's forum" which may or may not be locked down - I've never tried to access it. Maybe there needs to be a "pervert's forum" - ok perhaps not that particular name.
Pandora: If WP had to have the "sniggering boys behind the toilet" forums, what do you think they would need to do to make sure they didn't offend?
If I feel frightened by something, I am likely to go into attack mode and this is what has happened in the adult forum. I have spent years being treated as a second class citizen simply because I am a woman. Another reaction I have to feeling scared is to be sarcastic or make fun of the thing that frightened me in an effort to defuse its impact.
That doesn't mean I am a man hater but it does mean I find comments about men using women sexually frightening and distressing. (The converse applies too).
I didn't know how to copy over the name of a thread or a post to alert the moderator to something upsetting and I still don't know how to do it so that is why it might seem there is no context to what I said about harassment.
_________________
Break out you Western girls,
Someday soon you're gonna rule the world.
Break out you Western girls,
Hold your heads up high.
"Western Girls" - Dragon
It shocked me, too, the first time I saw it. Alex thinks it's important for aspies to have a safe place to talk about these things.
I know prostitution is legal in some countries but in the US, it is illegal in many states. I also note there is discussion about taking hard drugs. What if a young impressionable aspie takes crack or angel dust because they think it will make them more sociable and then they overdose and die or get serious brain damage or murder somebody while they are "high"?
WP could open itself to legal actions on this basis.
I also don't agree that venting is always the way to go. Sure it is okay within limits, but once indulged in to a great degree, it encourages the person to dwell on their bad feelings and maybe even act upon them.
For those prople abusing me for being elitist, don't forget I am officially diagnosed AS so have trouble expressing emotions about scary topics.
if people want drugs its there choice
The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,357
Location: Looking down on humanity
If they want to kill themselves in doing so, then I guess it may be hard to stop them. Illicit drugs are illegal, possession is a crime, pushing is a felony, and all this means is that serious jail time can be the result. Either that, or some poor bugger gets killed in a robbery for drug money, or soeone gets AIDS from an infected needle, or someone dies through taking a tampered dose of ecstasy. If people want help to get off them, fine. Discuss it all you want. But if people are saying that taking them is cool and someone overdoses and kills themselves vecause of the discussion, then intent follows the bullet. BTW, pedophilia, prostitution, child pornography etc are still illegal activities as well last time I read the news, so they should not be discussed on an open forum at all, and the police would discourage even closed fora as well. Criminal activity can get people into serious trouble, and the internet is one place where unfortunately it has become rife. Do we need that sort of behaviour here? Methinks not.
_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!
Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.
the goverment has no right to make drugs illegal
If you need to copy that sort of thing, just copy the URL from your address bar. I'm going to elaborate a bit because I simply don't know how much you know about web browsers and computers in general, and I'd rather err on the side of excess than assume you know exactly what I'm talking about and have that not be the case. As an example, the last thread of this page has the URL of
If you want to make a statement like that, back it up. Otherwise, I could just as easily say that you have no right to make that statement. Which is pretty pointless, since you're going to say that it is your right...which is what the government could just as easily do, if supporting evidence isn't necessary.
As far as the government is concerned (or at the very least they will claim this) they are protecting their nation's citizens. To have some freedoms guaranteed and protected, you have to give up other freedoms. In this case, the "freedom" to do drugs. At least as long as the law stays what it is.
wsmac
Veteran
Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,888
Location: Humboldt County California
The idea that these things do not belong here on WP is elitist and ignorant.
People with AS, ADHD, etc. desire a place to talk openly. This is the place to do that.
Expressing personal things thought to be rare, perverse, etc. and finding out there are other people just like you or who have just as 'weird' things about them is a positive experience not a negative.
Wrong Planet is for people who already feel outside the 'norm'. I have never seen this as a place where we can only speak specifically about AS, Autism, and ADHD.
It's a place for people like us to have a forum to express ourselves when we believe there is no other place we can do so.
Saying a member should take their talk of certain thoughts and behaviors, the likes of what I have been defending here, to some special website for people who are 'way out there' or 'perverts', etc, is ignorant.
It's playing the same game of censorship and repression that the so-called NT's play.
This is the place where people can see how they actually relate to other people who all fall under the umbrella of this 'spectrum'.
It sort of feels like a family where the mom, dad, and siblings tell one child to take her/his questions elsewhere because the rest of the family is just too uncomfortable with the topics that one member has questions about.
If we cannot express ourselves openly here... amongst those we relate to... then what sort of expression and learning do you suppose will happen on those other 'special' website you people want us to go to?
And I include myself in this group of people you are trying to suppress.
I have spoken about my sexuality and gender issues, although I don't believe I have gone into too graphic a detail.
Still, once you clean up Wrong Planet of the ilk that turns our stomach, how long will it be before you turn on me?
I still believe that the only way to correct ignorant assumptions about people with AS, ADD/HD, Autism, etc, is to allow free expression when that expression does not cause harm to others.
I also believe the whole world would be better off once we accepted the fact that every person on this earth has some idiosyncrasy that other's would not understand or appreciate.
It's about acceptance and as long as you keep trying to refrain from being accepting, and keep sweeping it all under the rug... you help continue the myths that hurt our societies.
Whew... I need to get back over to the post about Macallan hiding in the coat rack... I need a good laugh
I never said that just because someone has AS or ADD/HD that they are going to want to be necessarily interested... as you say. What I was trying to get across was that there are people here who do have AS, ADD/HD and DO want to discuss these things when they feel they cannot elsewhere. Some of us do feel this is a place we can feel more accepted than other places. That's all.
The topics I've been writing about here are not exclusive to people on the spectrum. I have never said that.
No, I did not say we are 'outside the norm'. Go back and read my post you quoted earlier.. I say," Wrong Planet is for people who already feel outside the 'norm'.". This is copied exactly as it is written and it means exactly what it says... that people here, as shown by their posts, feel outside the 'norm', whatever that description of 'norm' is.
Sorry, but I am not seeing the connection between your remarks and mine, here.
-I have never taken a holier-than-thou position regarding anything.
-My words concerning NT's is this, "...the so-called NT's play". I said... the so-called NT's, meaning I do not see that term NT as being an absolute. It is an expression used to differentiate between those who have or believe they have AS, etc., and those who do not. I personally do not go around calling people NT. If you read further down my post above you'll see this, "I also believe the whole world would be better off once we accepted the fact that every person on this earth has some idiosyncrasy that other's would not understand or appreciate."
-I have never said anything about my diagnosis of ADHD being 'better' than anyone else's diagnosis of anything.
-You seem angry and resentful to the point that you are taking my words WAY out of context.
Please read my post that appeared after the one you quoted to get a better idea of my usage of the terms; ellitist, and ignorant.
That sounds good.
I agree with your first sentence here, but the last one seems to contradict the first.
I only stated my disagreement to the opinions of other members here on the board, and I tried to explain why I feel the way I do.
I have not called for anyone to go elsewhere to post, and I have not told anyone that they should not be posting the things they are.
You words come across as very passionate and angry. My first reaction is that you were feeling very upset and perhaps these words do not reflect they way you deliberate and argue topics here on WrongPlannet.
I'll state this again... my words previous and now are not made out of anger. I do not wish anyone to 'shut up' just because we do not agree.
My remarks were very specific about our societal inhibitions and why I thought they are more harmful than open discussion.
If you, The_Chosen_One, have misread my words... I hope this post will clarify things better.
In returning to this thread, I see quite a lot of discussion about attacks on Pandora.
I was not attacking her, I was attacking this ideaology that because some people find posts offensive, this means we should not allow those topics to be discussed on our Adult Forum, instead of people practicing a little discrimination when deciding which posts to read or not.
I do not know Pandora, so I make no personal judgements concerning her.
Anymore questions... feel free to ask. I'll be happy to clear up any misunderstandings... yours or mine
And my question from earlier still stands, although perhaps I should create a new thread... "Define offensive", or something like that. My ignorance about how people define the term 'offensive' is no worse than anyone else's ignorance on other issues/topics. I seek to understand what I do not understand.
_________________
fides solus
===============
LIBRARIES... Hardware stores for the mind
Pandora wrote:
Put into that context, I can see how it would be frightening - particularly when very shady topics get discussed. A bit like talking to a group of people then slowly realizing part-way through the conversation that one (or more) are "monsters" - and they know who you are.
BTW: I'm not trying to suggest that anyone here is a monster... I've just used strong language to convey a certain point of view.
