richardbenson wrote:
oh its necessary, i just never understood why everyone always aks to be one like its so cool or something
People who got to be CoSysop's on my time with limited rights had explicit interest in topics and fields of knowledge I didn't have. When you act as SysOp or moderator, you simply has to draw a very flexible thin line of appropriate/unappropriate with rules set as firm as possible in as a few words as possible... and se it from a flexible perspective. There's always the grunts, the wannabees, the newbies, the accommodated people feeling cozy in the chat, and those who has absolutely outrageous hate to the topic and want the topic beeing sent to hell for cooking over. And so on.
Most people asking to be a CoSys was simply wanting the power and worship. They got neglected. But honestly people that realy knew what they talked about could get a CoSys+ status with ability to change users status because they where simply totaly snowed in on the subject and didn't care a dime about the other topics in the discussions. They where, and is in my opionion, the best CoSys I've ever had in their specific field of knowledge, and they happily warn a user for misbehaviour a couple of times instead of throwing in the big axe for a mispelled word of honour.
Maybe that's why my BBS survived for 17 years on various software and is still known as a BBS to remember (and is still there, I''ve just haven't found the goddamned mediaconverter between 10-baseT and 10-Base2 that my 'miggy has (remember, its from 1992 so it's celebrating 14 years computer time, it's only a teenage computer! Going into puberty.).