Making it Better: The future of WP
I'd like to think that the vast majority here are on the same page on what is an attack or not
I agree. Shaming, mocking and ridiculing others by name, by insinuation, or by generalisations is never OK.
Deciding if someone deserves to be upset or not, is never OK.
Suggesting those people shouldn't post on this support site for Neurodiverse thinkers, is never OK.
We don't need a thesaurus or list of examples to know what's supportive vs hurtful. It's common sense.
Our triggers may differ from one another, but that doesn't negate our personal accountability to follow the rules.
If someone is asked to stop, or if they've been warned repeatedly by the recipient and / or mods, then there's no excuse.
_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles
In the world in which we live, victims will lash out at you for being helpful, and your best intentions will not shield you from their attacks; nor will your best intentions shield you from "board warnings", "friendly suggestions", and threats of suspension or banishment from the moderators.
So, when someone shows up and and posts a tale of lifetime woe and misery, I usually try to find another thread in which to post. I was not always this way, but had I not tried to play the role of a "Good Samaritan" years ago, other members might not think so badly of me. As things stand right now, whether I do good or bad, there is a chorus of voices slamming me for what they perceive as a bad attitude, bad intentions, and bad treatment of those who are "in need", even if I do absolutely nothing!
I won't stand in the way of anyone who tries to help, but just don't expect me to try to help, ever again.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
I can't relate to this, as it's never happened to me. It sounds like a moderation issue, rather than a member issue.
If you make a truly supportive comment to a brand new member (e.g., no relationship history with them), and they attack you for it, then they should be warned for breaking rules. I'd assume you wouldn't write to them again.
I think WP needs to provide more resources about mental health and trauma, so members who choose to reply in The Haven will understand the basics of how to best support people in crisis. We're warned about responding in PPR when we are "unprepared", and I think the same should apply to The Haven.
https://www.helpguide.org/articles/ptsd ... h-ptsd.htm
Tips #2 to #5 of this article ^ offer practical information about how to support a person with PTSD.
This advice would also benefit members with other co-morbid conditions (depression, anxiety, grief, panic attacks, etc.)
Unfortunately, some people who reply to vulnerable members don't realise how damaging their dismissive or sarcastic comments can be.
For some members, our words and choices can mean the difference between life and death.
_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles
Thank god that is in the past what Fnord is talking about.
Yeah there is bad moderation on the internet. I've gotten myself booted from a group for dumbing down my language to someone who claimed I was making myself look stupid so I told her back she was the one being stupid, not me. Turns out she was one of the mods of the group and I found out from other former members she will insult members to provoke them so they will attack her so she will have a reason to boot them. Talk about mod abuse.
It's human to lash back when someone attacks you or insults you.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
It's nice to see you back posting Isabella
I've experienced being lashed out at by people I believed wanted help, it has a valid potential to cause harm to others, being elevated to a place where this is a protected behaviour creates a toxic environment.
The responders may or may not have posted about their own challenges, some are more private, but lack of clicks on their non existent threads shouldnt lower the importance of their wellbeing.
I believe the rule about not causing further distress should be a standard for everyone, the OP included, not just those who reply.
We dont know, nor can we verify what challenges people actually face.
_________________
http://www.neurovoice.org
An ASD inclusive peer-orientated space for social interaction and support, where the Autism Spectrum is the norm, all are welcome.
I can't relate to this, as it's never happened to me. It sounds like a moderation issue, rather than a member issue.
If you make a truly supportive comment to a brand new member (e.g., no relationship history with them), and they attack you for it, then they should be warned for breaking rules. I'd assume you wouldn't write to them again.
I think WP needs to provide more resources about mental health and trauma, so members who choose to reply in The Haven will understand the basics of how to best support people in crisis. We're warned about responding in PPR when we are "unprepared", and I think the same should apply to The Haven.
https://www.helpguide.org/articles/ptsd ... h-ptsd.htm
Tips #2 to #5 of this article ^ offer practical information about how to support a person with PTSD.
This advice would also benefit members with other co-morbid conditions (depression, anxiety, grief, panic attacks, etc.)
Unfortunately, some people who reply to vulnerable members don't realize how damaging their dismissive or sarcastic comments can be.
For some members, our words and choices can mean the difference between life and death.
To give you context, this is the equivalency of his advice. If a person says they're having trouble with their home life they're told simply to move out. And, if they say they don't have any money or enough money then Fnord will say get a job that pays enough.
He doesn't sit down with the person and help that person come up with a comprehensive and actionable plan that is realistic to that person. And, he never, as far as I know, recommends any resources like reading materials that would be of value. It's overly simplistic advice that doesn't help with anything.
I've experienced being lashed out at by people I believed wanted help, it has a valid potential to cause harm to others, being elevated to a place where this is a protected behaviour creates a toxic environment.
The responders may or may not have posted about their own challenges, some are more private, but lack of clicks on their non existent threads shouldnt lower the importance of their wellbeing.
I believe the rule about not causing further distress should be a standard for everyone, the OP included, not just those who reply.
We dont know, nor can we verify what challenges people actually face.
I've also had people lash out at me randomly here too when I wasn't even being insulting or mean. I just put them on my black list.
I have had my posts randomly be reported on Reddit as well because somehow my tone sounded off even though I wasn't belittling anyone nor making fun of anyone.
That was where I was coming from when I said anything can be a personal attack. I just wish people would stop assuming people are intentionally not following that rule.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
Yeah there is bad moderation on the internet. I've gotten myself booted from a group for dumbing down my language to someone who claimed I was making myself look stupid so I told her back she was the one being stupid, not me. Turns out she was one of the mods of the group and I found out from other former members she will insult members to provoke them so they will attack her so she will have a reason to boot them. Talk about mod abuse.
It's human to lash back when someone attacks you or insults you.
That is a common and rather unimaginative way of mod abuse.
I think it is more complex/interesting if minions and sock-puppets are involved.
I've experienced being lashed out at by people I believed wanted help, it has a valid potential to cause harm to others, being elevated to a place where this is a protected behaviour creates a toxic environment.
The responders may or may not have posted about their own challenges, some are more private, but lack of clicks on their non existent threads shouldnt lower the importance of their wellbeing.
I believe the rule about not causing further distress should be a standard for everyone, the OP included, not just those who reply.
We dont know, nor can we verify what challenges people actually face.
I've also had people lash out at me randomly here too when I wasn't even being insulting or mean. I just put them on my black list.
I have had my posts randomly be reported on Reddit as well because somehow my tone sounded off even though I wasn't belittling anyone nor making fun of anyone.
That was where I was coming from when I said anything can be a personal attack. I just wish people would stop assuming people are intentionally not following that rule.
I guess it's easier to believe that its intentional, a simple solution and the problem seems solved.
Except it's not, a one size fits all approach adds another layer of complication to a miscommunication.
Building perhaps on previous traumas around miscommunications.
_________________
http://www.neurovoice.org
An ASD inclusive peer-orientated space for social interaction and support, where the Autism Spectrum is the norm, all are welcome.
Teach51
Veteran
Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,808
Location: Where angels do not fear to tread.
Reading a post several times before posting is good. Have I attacked the poster's country, am I actually being helpful or making things worse?
_________________
My best will just have to be good enough.
Last edited by Teach51 on 17 Aug 2020, 12:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Yeah there is bad moderation on the internet. I've gotten myself booted from a group for dumbing down my language to someone who claimed I was making myself look stupid so I told her back she was the one being stupid, not me. Turns out she was one of the mods of the group and I found out from other former members she will insult members to provoke them so they will attack her so she will have a reason to boot them. Talk about mod abuse.
It's human to lash back when someone attacks you or insults you.
That is a common and rather unimaginative way of mod abuse.
I think it is more complex/interesting if minions and sock-puppets are involved.
TBH I felt from the start the mod had set me up to attack her and to dumb down my words to get her to understand what I am talking about so she would boot me. Then I heard from other former members a similar thing had happened to them when they complained about that group and that mod and it was obvious what mod they were talking about. So I wasn't wrong when I imagined that.
Surprise surprise I hear the group is pretty much dead now. Most of them had moved into a chat is why.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
One response from a WP member absolutely shocked me. All he said was something on the lines of: Move to another country where they don't abuse peoples' civil rights. Something along these lines.
What happened here is this.
A woman asks for help not talking about the country she lives in but she writes United Arab Emirates on her profile.
The said member ignored her question but attacked her country. I don't need to elaborate on how wrong this is. Nasty, even prejudiced and deliberate.
The lady of course disappeared.
I wanted to report it because it seemed so verbally violent to me and I felt so bad for her. She came for help and got a slap in the face.
What is the lesson to be learned here? I don't know. It was a personal attack on a complete stranger, on her homeland , that she has the right to love and respect and had nothing to do with her question.
I don't want to say who made this hurtful, irreversible error but I suggest that we read our posts several times before posting to avoid such incidents.
Mother seeking help = attacking her country. Is that appropriate? Not sure. If I am not sure then I won't post it.
that is awful
you're v compassionate.
i would have reported. but looking back, i didn't report another user's post that was very abusive and racist towards someone here...so i probably wouldn't have. but not out of compassion.. .just from feeling sure no action would be taken..
_________________
Take defeat as an urge to greater effort.
-Napoleon Hill
I saw your original post before the big edit.
I think I know what thread you are talking about and I didn't see that post so maybe it was done by a troll and that account got nuked or the post was removed.
I don't see how you attacked their country other than saying what the person wrote. Repeating what they said isn't an attack.
PS, profile shows the mother visited this forum today so she didn't get scared off by that person. Plus, she got many good responses.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
