Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

DemocraticSocialistHun
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 144
Location: NE Ohio, United Snakes of Neoconservatism

27 Jul 2010, 5:28 am

For the "Diagnoses" field of profiles, you provide only a list of multiple guess options. "Have Aspergers - Diagnosed," "Have Aspergers - Undiagnosed," "Not sure if I have it or not," "Family member with Asperger's," and "Other autism spectrum disorder" make it sound like dengue fever. How about upbeat choices along the lines of "Card Carrying Member of the Aspergian Alliance" and "Mad and Proud"?


_________________
40 acres, a mule, and 40,000 years worth of interest
http://matthewlisraelisaterrorist.blogspot.com/
http://mixedstateecodepression73.wordpress.com/


Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

27 Jul 2010, 6:48 am

DemocraticSocialistHun wrote:
For the "Diagnoses" field of profiles, you provide only a list of multiple guess options. "Have Aspergers - Diagnosed," "Have Aspergers - Undiagnosed," "Not sure if I have it or not," "Family member with Asperger's," and "Other autism spectrum disorder" make it sound like dengue fever. How about upbeat choices along the lines of "Card Carrying Member of the Aspergian Alliance" and "Mad and Proud"?


For the time being, you can put that into your signature. After you get 1000 posts, you may have a custom rank to alter to your standards.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


Mysty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,762

27 Jul 2010, 9:28 am

"mad and proud"? What does that have to do with one's place on the autism spectrum? Madness and autism are quite different things.

Personally, I think the drop down choice thing should stick to standard labels, and cutesy stuff individuals can use on their own in their sig and/or (if they have enough posts) custom rank. I don't want someone else's cutesy wording imposed on me.

And I don't see anything negative in the standard labels used there. Yeah, they aren't "upbeat". But no reason they should be. They aren't downbeat either. Neutral labels that are neither positive or negative.


_________________
not aspie, not NT, somewhere in between
Aspie Quiz: 110 Aspie, 103 Neurotypical.
Used to be more autistic than I am now.


DemocraticSocialistHun
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 144
Location: NE Ohio, United Snakes of Neoconservatism

27 Jul 2010, 12:54 pm

Mysty wrote:
And I don't see anything negative in the standard labels used there. Yeah, they aren't "upbeat". But no reason they should be. They aren't downbeat either. Neutral labels that are neither positive or negative.


I hardly consider labels that assume that we are defective neurotypicals to be neutral. Using psychiatric labels is like called cats defective dogs. Little has changed since the days of drapetomania.


_________________
40 acres, a mule, and 40,000 years worth of interest
http://matthewlisraelisaterrorist.blogspot.com/
http://mixedstateecodepression73.wordpress.com/


Mysty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,762

27 Jul 2010, 1:19 pm

DemocraticSocialistHun wrote:
Mysty wrote:
And I don't see anything negative in the standard labels used there. Yeah, they aren't "upbeat". But no reason they should be. They aren't downbeat either. Neutral labels that are neither positive or negative.


I hardly consider labels that assume that we are defective neurotypicals to be neutral.


Well, then, good thing the labels used don't make that assumption.

You're reading into the labels more than what's there.


_________________
not aspie, not NT, somewhere in between
Aspie Quiz: 110 Aspie, 103 Neurotypical.
Used to be more autistic than I am now.