WerewolfPoet wrote:
I agree that it would be nice to be able to praise somebody for a well-written post without having to take up another post to do so and potentially disturbing the flow of the conversation in the process. This could also encourage shier users; if they see that their post is well liked, then they may be more inclined to post more content and, thus, contribute more to the site.
It may not necessarily have to be a "like" button if one is concerned about mimicking Facebook ; I've seen "hearts," "smiles," "cookies," and "____ finds this post to be helpful" serve similar purposes.
The issue with this becoming a "popularity contest" is a valid one, but I feel as though subtle "contests" exist regardless (for example, some could arguably use their post count, how long they've been on WrongPlanet, how many times their name is mentioned when typed into the searchbar, and similar distinctions as a way to feel "popular"). Would having the likes be anonymous do anything to curb the aforementioned issues with this becoming a "popularity contest" (i.e. instead of having "WerewolfPoet and Dubious like this," having "2 people like this")? If not, then would having the likes be private (i.e. instead of everyone being able to see the number of likes that a post has, having this only be viewable to the poster, much like the "edit" button) be useful?
There is also the issue of reformatting the site, though, which has been mentioned to be rather difficult with the specific program used to create this website.
A temporary workaround would be to PM the user of the likable post with something along the lines of "Hey, that post about ____ in the ____ thread was really awesome!", though one could understand how shier users would be hesitant to do this.
Prime example^
I would "like" or give points to this response, because it covers many areas of concern and I generally agree with the conclusions,
but I haven't much to add because this poster already did the demanding mental work for me

.
_________________
*"I don't know what it is, but I know what it isn't."*