Fnord wrote:
Ever since Alex got rid of those distorted words, even this myopic old coot isn't bothered any more. .
Empathy wrote:
It could be clear from your myopic entry, that you are both clinically and sexually repressed?
You can’t baby-sit this amount of data being processed. From a level viewpoint, I ’d be sure to train my eye on the intellectual birthright of this site and the status of its fellow occupants.
Hopper wrote:
Both glad and sorry it wasn't just me.
Still had the problem early this morning when I tried a longer post. It's quite off-putting. Haven't tried anything that might cause it since.
(I've now installed Firefox). I think that what's more off putting is directing the path at someone who's channelled themselves into rectifying matters of a lost cause. (site-failure) This would be beneficial for all site owners to understand.
I think the notion that ‘they’ve tried to help the users‘, is not music to my ears.
Soon we’ll all be posting through registered aps, designed to create further noise and distraction to our lives.
The current ethos is mismanaged but what happens when execs try to extract the profits from a higher media maelstrom?
If we’re not investing benefits from this sites hazed infrastructure, then just
who is?
This site wishes to generate profit from big corporate companies and not be labelled to the recycling bin.
What it fails to take into measure is that people who are already being labelled aren’t going to be short listed anytime soon when the cracks in the margin start to appear..
We should'nt be taking this matter lightly in the case of when a real cyber attack unfolds.
We need to start managing the risk ourselves.