18 May 2016, 1:40 am
I could help with removing vashakiran, or however this is called 
18 May 2016, 1:56 am
18 May 2016, 8:46 am
18 May 2016, 1:09 pm
18 May 2016, 1:41 pm
Why not ask Alex and see, what he says? 
18 May 2016, 2:16 pm
Chummy wrote:
Why would one want that liability?
Because vashakiran upset me. I have the strong feeling they don't belong here so they should be removed. It's the same like with correcting clothes on hangers when I'm in the shop (does anyone else do that?)
if staff is not available to do that, I will.
18 May 2016, 2:28 pm
18 May 2016, 4:46 pm
18 May 2016, 9:33 pm
18 May 2016, 9:42 pm
18 May 2016, 9:44 pm
Jensen wrote:
Why not ask Alex and see, what he says?
Or see if he replies, perhaps?
18 May 2016, 10:04 pm
carbonmonoxide wrote:
Chummy wrote:
Why would one want that liability?
Because vashakiran upset me. I have the strong feeling they don't belong here so they should be removed. It's the same like with correcting clothes on hangers when I'm in the shop (does anyone else do that?)
if staff is not available to do that, I will.Only mildly OT, but I "front and face" grocery store shelves without even realizing I'm doing it, especially when I've taken an item from that section.
19 May 2016, 3:39 am
Edenthiel wrote:
Only mildly OT, but I "front and face" grocery store shelves without even realizing I'm doing it, especially when I've taken an item from that section.
That is a very good answer
and how come I didn't come up with front facing myself?! Although I run with misplaced item (probably abandoned by undecided customer) across the store a couple of times to put it where it belongs. I once (it was 'before autism') read a psychologist interpreted similar behaviour as a sign of low self esteem (because it's doing someone else's job) and I tried to stop. I couldn't fall asleep later, worrying about those poor tomatoes placed between bags of rice!
19 May 2016, 3:47 am
i'd say spam removal is more janitorial than administrative...
Jensen wrote:
I think, they have been removed. Can´t be searched.
i've deleted 'em.
i've always been dubious of the guideline of automatically disregarding anyone who volunteers to be a moderator, or otherwise suggests their willingness for the position. i feel like we overlook a lot of great people that way.
still, i feel it is there for a reason.
we have a couple of mods who aren't active right now, i'd actually say we have all the help we need, but alex (or the other mods) may feel differently.
19 May 2016, 5:43 am
...When did that Prexy rule apply ? BTW , did you ever hear of one where the Fiirst Lady ~ I guess?? it was specifically the First Lady 
~ was not suppose to specifically campaign for her hubby ?
This leading to the like , IIRC , of a magazine article credited to Mamie Eisenhower titled " Vote For My Husband , or for Adlai Stevenson , But Please Vote " ! I remember reading that this was the case .
kraftiekortie wrote:
There's a funny rule pertaining to becoming a Moderator.
One should never "volunteer" for the job.
It's like the old days, when a President never campaigned for himself.
One should never "volunteer" for the job.
It's like the old days, when a President never campaigned for himself.
_________________
Renal kidney failure, congestive heart failure, COPD. Can't really get up from a floor position unhelped anymore:-(.
One of the walking wounded ~ SMASHED DOWN by life and age, now prevented from even expressing myself! SOB.
" Oh, no! First you have to PROVE you deserve to go away to college! " ~ My mother, 1978 (the heyday of Andy Gibb and Player). I would still like to go.
My life destroyed by Thorazine and Mellaril - and rape - and the Psychiatric/Industrial Complex. SOB:-(! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!
19 May 2016, 8:06 am
