Okay, but I'm still baffled by the data.
Each of the vertical lines is June at one year intervals, so each little blue box is two months.
Posts per user per day reached an all time high around the beginning of 2006. During the following four months, it plunged to an all time low, falling to about a third of it's previous level.
Then it immediately shot back up again and 14 months later it almost matched the previous high, reaching a peak in the early summer of 2007.
Then it fell like a rock for two months, then switched to a slow steady decline. The most recent data point is just above the all time low.
Posts per day shot up 450 percent from the middle of 2006 to the middle of 2007. In the next two months, it fell by a third, then bounced back up again to match the previous high eight months later.
In the next two months, it fell by about a quarter.
I'm not a statistician, but the sample set is well up in the thousands, so it's not like asking three people who they're planning to vote for, then drawing a conclusion.
And there's six data point per year, so each plotted data point covers a two month period. I would expect spring break to get swamped out, and if there's an annual pattern of spring peaks, I can't see it.
The only consistent pattern I can see is posts per user, which would be expected to increase with time.
Other than that, I can't see no sense.
_________________
They murdered boys in Mississippi. They shot Medgar in the back.
Did you say that wasn't proper? Did you march out on the track?
You were quiet, just like mice. And now you say that we're not nice.
Well thank you buddy for your advice...
-Malvina