Pandora_Box wrote:
I suppose. But for me, it feels more like just reguritating information.
Well, it is, but for testing a group of people or making a standardized test procedure, it's about the only way.
I can't test your ability to do a job by handing you a file and say, "do this" and then judge your end-product....Well, I could, but it would be impractical, prone to my subjective interpretation of quality and impossible to do for a large number of candidates.
It is also how there is a given number of people who pass tests to get hired and later are fired for incompetence.
They may be smart and able to excel on the objective screening tests, but when it comes to doing the job, they are clueless. Since most people who excel on screening tests do well at the job, remaining with this practice seems sensible.