Credentialism and the crisis of the university

Page 1 of 2 [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Berlin
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 93
Location: Canada

30 Dec 2010, 6:39 pm

While Professor Cote is speaking mainly about Canada, this certainly applies in other countries as well:

Quote:
In their forthcoming book Ivory Tower Blues: A University System in Crisis, Prof. Cote and his coauthor, Anton Allahar, sound the alarm about the demise of higher education, where many students are more interested in the piece of paper they get at the end of their programs than in the intellectual journey along the way, where professors are cowed into watering down courses and bumping up grades, and where universities are run like corporations hawking mass-produced degrees which are increasingly in demand but increasingly meaningless.

The consequences, the authors argue, are a disengaged student body, disillusioned faculty and a glut of bachelor-degree-holding graduates with unrealistically lofty aspirations in for a shock when they land in a job market fuelled by "credentialism" and plagued by under-employment.

The book chronicles what happens when "fully empowered" students arrive on campus well aware of their rights but with little sense of their own responsibilities. Accustomed to being coddled in high school and given good grades for minimal effort, they bring a consumer mentality to the classroom which leaves them indignant, combative and ready to complain when they earn anything less than an A--no matter how little they deserve it.

Given the high cost of higher education today -- the average tuition for an undergraduate degree in Canada stands at $4,000, never mind ancillary fees, books and living expenses -- the professors argue the students are not entirely unjustified in wanting the most bang for their buck.

Prof. Cote recalled an episode three years ago when he experienced this new assertiveness firsthand after informing his students of their grades in a class where the average was 58%.

"One student was just totally irate and very abusive. She got a 60%," he said. "Finally she said 'That does it. I'm dropping this class.' I just said 'Anybody else?' It was good riddance."

Such an attitude leads to what the authors call "degree purchasing" -- the placing of value on the framed degree instead of the education.

A full 90% of Grade 9 students now aspire to go on to university today, according to recent surveys. But that doesn't mean all those ambitious high school students are cut out for higher learning, the authors insist in their new book.

They say that under the current system, young people are almost forced to obtain at least an undergraduate degree to have any hope at a decent job --even an unskilled one.

Credentialism is the constant raising of the bar for basic employment, fuelled by the belief that a formal education is the best training for the job market.

Ivory Tower Blues describes how credentialism's rampant spread now means that even entry-level paperpushing jobs such as bank teller and office clerk require a university degree, while new diploma programs are sprouting to up the ante in occupations such as retail management.

Prof. Cote and Prof. Allahar insist they do not want to be too harsh in their criticism of today's student body. Some students are as thirsty for knowledge and intellectually curious as ever. The best and brightest are still out there, and they thrive despite being dragged down by the mediocrity around them, the authors say in their book.

As for the disengaged undergraduates on whom they focus, the authors lay the blame at the foot of a school system lacking rigour and on a generation of "helicopter parents" who are always hovering, ready to solve the problems of their dependent progeny.

Today's public school students are inculcated with self-esteem at the expense of self-efficacy. Everyone gets a gold star for effort. Every pupil is "special." No child is left behind to repeat a grade no matter how little they grasp, the authors say.

Witness what happened to the C grade. Long used to denote average performance, Cs are no longer an acceptable grade in many households, while As and Bs are assigned with such frequency that all distinctions have been blurred between so-so, good, very good, excellent and outstanding.

The result, said Prof. Cote, is a cohort of semi-literate students arriving on campus quite accustomed to getting As even though they are unable to string a proper sentence together, let alone a paragraph or an entire essay.

Grade inflation begins in high school, the authors say, but has carried over into the university system with students' sense of entitlement, faculty's unwillingness to fight to preserve high standards and administrative policies that reward departments with the most upper-year undergraduates.

The professors readily admit many of their colleagues have been complicit in the decline of academic life through what they call the "disengagement compact."

Fearing a backlash when it comes time for teaching evaluations or simply intimidated by students willing to whine, cry and yell if they don't get the grade they think they deserve, many faculty have simply succumbed to their new roles as "gatekeepers of the middle class," the authors say.

"This tacit agreement between teachers and students is 'I'll leave you alone if you leave me alone,' " they said in the book. " 'That is, I won't make you work too hard (read a lot, write a lot) so that I won't have to grade as many papers or explain why you are not performing well.' In this compact students get higher grades through pestering, or threat of it, rather than by actually doing the required work or working at a level once required of university students."

Few professors have been willing to take a stand and those who do risk censure or unpopularity.


http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news ... a0&k=93169



techn0teen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 663

30 Dec 2010, 8:46 pm

Grade inflation is mostly nonexistent for the classes I have been taking. All my classes I worked hard for the grade I earned; a 3.37 cummulative GPA in computer engineering.

I then know other students who only take professors that are easy and curve heavily. They then have a good 3.5 by scrapping by with the least amount of effort. These students are then thrown financial aid while I try to do it in the way that I know will prepare me for graduate school.

These lazy students make the honors society while I study harder and harder to successfully raise my GPA above a 3.5 before my Junior year. I agree that this is a serious problem. Many people in the university don't deserve to be there. But society threatens them with a dead-end job.

What is going to happen is that so many people are going to go to college that the tuition will skyrocket to the point that it will be impossible to afford. Less people will attend. Only the students who want to work her or his butt off will be able to successfully get financial aid; rising above the average students. The law of supply and demand will make it so only those few people can afford college (because they work hard to get financial aid) and will be able to get a degree. The value of the degree will go back up as successful graduates go down.



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 82
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

30 Dec 2010, 10:07 pm

The University is already a daycare center with - so far as I have seen in a longish academic career - four clear missions:

1. keep the unemployment statistics looking lowby giving people something to do besides be in the work force

2. provide remedial education for the smallish percentage that will actually eventually get educated

3. provide certificates of employability for the large percentage who will really not need an education - or at least not tghis one

4. provide indoctrination to keep the people convinced of the party line.

I wish it were otherwise.



cyberscan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,296
Location: Near Panama, City Florida

31 Dec 2010, 12:03 am

This is exactly what happens when people who aren't meant to go to college are forced to in order to find decent employment. Society is made of up all kinds of people. There are those who research new scientific principles in material and building design, those who actually use these principles in putting together a design, those who take the blue prints and use them to actually build the factory, those who produce goods in the factory, and those who clean and maintain the factory.

The ones who research and come up with new scientific principles are the ones who actually benefit and need the college education or equivalent. The people who put together the design may benefit from having a degree, but one is not really needed to do this. The people who build the factory do not need a degree. They need on the job training. The same applies to those who work in the factory making the things we want or need. Those who clean the factory do not need degrees either.

Unfortunately governments at the behest of big business have decided to work to enslave the working class with so called "free trade" agreements that allow such business to enslave those without degrees. Those who do not need a college degree to be able to learn a job are now forced to get one in order to obtain any kind of decent pay. Instead of college being there to teach those who are curious, they have instead become a place to obtain work permits. The purpose of colleges have been hijacked, and as long as this continues, colleges will produce mediocre results.

States have made it so that many jobs that used to be learned by on the job training now require a degree or some other form of government mandated "education." This is done by passing laws that require a license in order to work in a particular field. Nursing is a primary example of this. It is also the reason why prices for basic services are sky high. In Florida, P.S.A., one needs government mandated education in order to install roofs, do electrical work, plumbing, driving a truck, etc. The days of a father passing his trade to his son or master passing a trade to an apprentice are long gone. In order to obtain decent employment, a person must "go to school" and be saddled with military service, student loans, or many other unnecessary burdens. Things won't change until licensing is done away with and replaced by certification.

In addition, large companies are no longer willing to invest in training employees. They would rather make the employee pay for their training or "education." With such burdens placed upon those leaving primary or secondary school, it becomes necessary for them to take shortcuts in order to be able to do the job they like.


_________________
I am AUTISTIC - Always Unique, Totally Interesting, Straight Talking, Intelligently Conversational.
I am also the author of "Tech Tactics Money Saving Secrets" and "Tech Tactics Publishing and Production Secrets."


Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 82
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

31 Dec 2010, 1:01 pm

One of the first classes I taught there were two girls - roommates - who clearly did not belong. Not that different from a lot of undergraduates, but what were they doing in MY class?.

I asked. One of them said she was hoping that in four years she would find the ight guy to marry and settle down to be a housewife with. The other said she was there because her parents did NOT go to college and she was their only child and a symbol of achievement.

It is a crying shame.



Dantac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,672
Location: Florida

31 Dec 2010, 1:12 pm

Its all about making money unfortunately. Its a self-serving cycle.

In the US:

A high school diploma used to certify that the graduate can read, write, do math up to algebra and entry calculus/physics level and has problem solving and reasoning skills.

Today it only means the kid attended class.

The next step was college/university. To get in the kids needed to get a certain score in the SAT exam.

Before, the SAT score decided what program the student could enter and there was a minimum score required to even be eligible to enter any university.

Today the SAT can be skipped in favor of college-specific 'tests' called CPT (college placement test) that is (amazingly) a severely dumbed down version of the SAT. If you can add , read a paragraph and write your name you pass it.

Senior year in university was another milestone.

Before, students could be denied taking high-level courses if their score on pre-req. classes was deficient and their overall GPA low.

Today the universities 'widen' the acceptable courses to satisfy graduation requirements to include non-major related classes. After all, a credit hour paid is a credit hour paid.


The only thing that has not changed yet is entrance to Masters programs. If your GPA is garbage there's no chance in hell you'll get into any Masters program.


Jobs that literally used to require only a high school diploma now 'prefer' a university graduate simply because the graduate can be exploited for more productivity at less pay than before. For example: being a manager in a fast food restaurant does not need a bachelors degree in management but having the manager with that degree, paying him the same amount a high school graduate would be paid, allows the restaurant to make him do the job of manager, human resources and basic accounting for the place.

I used to do hiring for a travel agency and I was routinely told to hire those with marketing degrees over those with travel/tourism degrees because the marketing people could be assigned 'special projects' which were pretty much the bulk of the agency's marketing efforts... so rather than pay them the $18 an hour marketing coordinator pay they would have the same work done plus have them do travel sales for a mere $9 an hour.



Berlin
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 93
Location: Canada

31 Dec 2010, 4:58 pm

Very good points so far.

It is indeed important to recognize (and has been pointed out) the material base for this phenomenon of credentialism and declining university standards. Up until the 1970s it was possible to get a good-paying job without any post-secondary qualifications (thought it's important to remember this was more so for men than for women, though the point is true for both genders). But the good blue collar jobs have largely disappeared, and many white collar jobs that used to be done by high school graduates are now often (if not always) filled by those with college degrees, since this is what employers generally prefer.

As a result, a lot of students don't want to be there. If good jobs were available for young adults, they'd take them and not attend at all. But since that isn't the case, universities are filled with disengaged students and most students are mainly interested in the piece of paper that will get them a good job.

Everyone who enters was apparently "always a good student" - and indeed in Ontario, where I teach, 40% of high school graduates now graduate with an 80+ average (compared to 5% in the early 1960s). Since high school grades are pretty meaningless, when these get a C or even a B on a paper, they'll complain about it and insist they "deserve" a higher grade. Often this is on the grounds that since they're paying tuition to the university, they are somehow entitled to a certain grade.

Around third year, your typical B/B-/C+ student realizes that it's time to start thinking about what they're going to do with their life, the immense pressure to change grades begins, as many come to the conclusion they "need" to go to graduate school. This is when we have to break the news that their chance of getting to any of the graduate programs at our university, or any decent graduate program, is practically nil. So far, graduate programs and professional schools (law, medicine, etc.) are pretty good at exercising quality control.



techn0teen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 663

01 Jan 2011, 4:02 pm

Berlin wrote:
Around third year, your typical B/B-/C+ student realizes that it's time to start thinking about what they're going to do with their life, the immense pressure to change grades begins, as many come to the conclusion they "need" to go to graduate school. This is when we have to break the news that their chance of getting to any of the graduate programs at our university, or any decent graduate program, is practically nil. So far, graduate programs and professional schools (law, medicine, etc.) are pretty good at exercising quality control.


A GPA above 3.0 (B average) is not good for graduate school? Guess I will have to work harder to ensure it is above a 3.5 and above.

Are you an advisor?

I do like that graduate programs keep a high standard. I hope I find more like-minded people if I get accepted to one that catches my interest.



JoeR43
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 85

01 Jan 2011, 4:14 pm

cyberscan wrote:
This is exactly what happens when people who aren't meant to go to college are forced to in order to find decent employment. Society is made of up all kinds of people. There are those who research new scientific principles in material and building design, those who actually use these principles in putting together a design, those who take the blue prints and use them to actually build the factory, those who produce goods in the factory, and those who clean and maintain the factory.

The ones who research and come up with new scientific principles are the ones who actually benefit and need the college education or equivalent. The people who put together the design may benefit from having a degree, but one is not really needed to do this. The people who build the factory do not need a degree. They need on the job training. The same applies to those who work in the factory making the things we want or need. Those who clean the factory do not need degrees either.

Unfortunately governments at the behest of big business have decided to work to enslave the working class with so called "free trade" agreements that allow such business to enslave those without degrees. Those who do not need a college degree to be able to learn a job are now forced to get one in order to obtain any kind of decent pay. Instead of college being there to teach those who are curious, they have instead become a place to obtain work permits. The purpose of colleges have been hijacked, and as long as this continues, colleges will produce mediocre results.

States have made it so that many jobs that used to be learned by on the job training now require a degree or some other form of government mandated "education." This is done by passing laws that require a license in order to work in a particular field. Nursing is a primary example of this. It is also the reason why prices for basic services are sky high. In Florida, P.S.A., one needs government mandated education in order to install roofs, do electrical work, plumbing, driving a truck, etc. The days of a father passing his trade to his son or master passing a trade to an apprentice are long gone. In order to obtain decent employment, a person must "go to school" and be saddled with military service, student loans, or many other unnecessary burdens. Things won't change until licensing is done away with and replaced by certification.

In addition, large companies are no longer willing to invest in training employees. They would rather make the employee pay for their training or "education." With such burdens placed upon those leaving primary or secondary school, it becomes necessary for them to take shortcuts in order to be able to do the job they like.


Whoa, you blame the corporations for the onset of this?

Wrong, this was in 1992 when the Democrats in Washington opened the floodgates for student loans. This allowed kids to get what was, in their mind, free money to attend college. Corporations and other employers are simply cashing in on a more educated / more desperate-for-work employee pool.



JoeR43
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 85

01 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm

But to the OP, yes, this is a huge problem. Canada and the US have slightly different versions of the issue.

In Canada, kids want "bang for their buck", but it's still relatively cheap and footed mostly by taxpayers. So essentially, kids either go to school on mostly the taxpayer's $, or they don't and pay a lot of tax dollars to higher-ed anyway. There's absolutely 0 reason for them to not "try it out", and Canada probably gets a lot of real prizes in their schools.

In the US, it's still expensive as crap (in fact, it's ultra-expensive, the only reason it's not at $15-$25K where it should be is because demand is so pointlessly high). Of course, kids have stafford loan money out the ass, and enroll anyway. It's sad that school will never be the big deal it used to be.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

01 Jan 2011, 4:51 pm

techn0teen wrote:
Grade inflation is mostly nonexistent for the classes I have been taking. All my classes I worked hard for the grade I earned; a 3.37 cummulative GPA in computer engineering.

It seems to vary from professor to professor, or even class to class. I've found that in the math and science courses I've taken, there is generally an inverse relationship between how much I learn in the class and the grade I am assigned at the end of the semester. Some professors pass out As for nothing, others actually challenge their students. I prefer the latter even if my GPA suffers as a result.

I wouldn't worry too much; grad school admissions officers can tell that a 3.2 in hard math/science/engineering courses means more than a 3.8 on a transcript filled with basket weaving and music appreciation. If you have any research experience, that will be more important than your coursework.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


JoeR43
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 85

01 Jan 2011, 5:18 pm

Orwell wrote:
techn0teen wrote:
Grade inflation is mostly nonexistent for the classes I have been taking. All my classes I worked hard for the grade I earned; a 3.37 cummulative GPA in computer engineering.

It seems to vary from professor to professor, or even class to class. I've found that in the math and science courses I've taken, there is generally an inverse relationship between how much I learn in the class and the grade I am assigned at the end of the semester. Some professors pass out As for nothing, others actually challenge their students. I prefer the latter even if my GPA suffers as a result.

I wouldn't worry too much; grad school admissions officers can tell that a 3.2 in hard math/science/engineering courses means more than a 3.8 on a transcript filled with basket weaving and music appreciation. If you have any research experience, that will be more important than your coursework.


That's exactly why I'm now looking into graduate school for economics or statistics.
Excellent GRE Quant score aside, I've been heavily involved in the data analysis of many market-research studies my company has submitted to the media. I'm far more proven than I was out of college.



Berlin
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 93
Location: Canada

01 Jan 2011, 6:58 pm

techn0teen wrote:
A GPA above 3.0 (B average) is not good for graduate school? Guess I will have to work harder to ensure it is above a 3.5 and above.


A GPA of at least 3.0 is often required by graduate schools. You don't "need" to have a 3.5 overall GPA.

If you're interested in pursuing a Ph.D., here's an article that unlocks the mystery, written by a computer science professor (particularly section 3).

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~harchol/gradschooltalk.pdf

I know at the university I teach at, we require a B+ average in the last 2 years of study as a minimum to get into our Master's programs (one distinction between the US and Canada is that the Master's and Ph.D. admissions are almost always separate).



Dantac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,672
Location: Florida

02 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm

Quote:

A GPA above 3.0 (B average) is not good for graduate school? Guess I will have to work harder to ensure it is above a 3.5 and above.

Are you an advisor?

I do like that graduate programs keep a high standard. I hope I find more like-minded people if I get accepted to one that catches my interest.


My college GPA now is at 3.0 exactly (curse math course 'Cs' brought all my A's to that /cry ).

I still have 6 semesters left of classes (none of which are math thankfully!)... I know that my best chance of entering the Archeology masters program is to have above a 3.5 GPA. If I want to have a chance at entering that master program in another university or overseas that is a requirement in order to be chosen instead of a local student.



techn0teen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 663

03 Jan 2011, 1:06 am

Orwell wrote:
I wouldn't worry too much; grad school admissions officers can tell that a 3.2 in hard math/science/engineering courses means more than a 3.8 on a transcript filled with basket weaving and music appreciation. If you have any research experience, that will be more important than your coursework.


That's good to hear. I am trying to learn and not earn a grade. It just gets discouraging at times because it seems my hard work does not pay off. I want to get a 3.5 GPA because I can get into the honors society (which means I get more opportunities to do research).



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

03 Jan 2011, 8:14 pm

Just talk to professors and see if any of them have research you can be involved in. If you show and interest and it's clear that you are at least reasonably competent, professors will likely be willing to give you a chance.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH