Let's just say that there's only two types of teachers. The strict ones, and the lenient ones.
The strict teachers are the ones that have really high expectations. They set rules, and there are no exceptions to them. Students are expected to complete work to perfection, and any mistakes are counted against them.
On the other end of the scale, lenient teachers don't really care about anything. Instead of spending the class reading out of the book, much time is wasted talking about subject material completely irrelevant to the course.
Now, say you had a choice between one or the other. If there is no middle ground, which one would you choose?
From what I've noticed, it seems that most people (at least 95%) prefer strict teachers. Their argument is that in the more lenient classes, they don't really learn anything. They need information to be forced down their throat at a fast pace and be pressured into learning the material by fear of failing the class.
I, for one, disagree with this. Strict teachers prevent me from enjoying the learning experience. I'm not free to learn at my own pace and at my own will. With lenient teachers, I'm pretty much free to do whatever I want, and I want to learn. When I have more lenient teachers, I can learn more, because I can learn the way that works best for me, and as a bonus I don't feel like a prisoner doing it.
I was just wondering if anyone here is with me on this. I think it might be an aspie thing.
_________________
Remember, all atrocities begin in a sensible place.