Guaranteed Interview Scheme
Bloodheart
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,194
Location: Newcastle, England.
UK people - have you ever taken advantage of the Guaranteed Interview Scheme?
I'm not officially diagnosed, but my understanding is that in the UK the definition of disabled doesn't require a formal diagnosis as such, and certainly having Asperger's has caused significant problems in obtaining a job as I really struggle to use a telephone and interviews are of course tough. I've been unemployed for 3+ years, with a maximum of 5 interviews during that time, none at all for about a year.
Obviously it tells the employer you're disabled - in general it may be beneficial to get a foot in the door, show that yes you've been unemployed for so long due to disability but that you're still a good employee, etc. Although in the job I'm applying for right now it may be a bad idea as it may highlight my problems using a telephone (the job involves some telephone use), and although I want a job this is a financial job which I just don't think I'm suitable for. This of course is irrelevant if I don't actually apply for this.
Any thoughts?
_________________
Bloodheart
Good-looking girls break hearts, and goodhearted girls mend them.
It depends. Some companies will deliberately hire disabled people and others won't. You might want to study the corporate culture of the company you are interested in. Do they have a track record of previously hiring the disabled? But if your disabilities will be noticed by bosses and coworkers, I guess there is no point in hiding them. You have nothing to lose by applying as a disabled person, if otherwise you would not apply at all. Also, long gaps in employment is a big sticking point with many employers. I always lied about them and told people that I was self-employed as a piano teacher. This is not true, but since I grew up with my mother being a piano teacher, I could speak intelligently to them about it so they always believed me. I think "piano teacher" is the most perfect lie for any employment gaps because it sounds classy and intelligent yet no one can disprove it. But I digress. I think you may as well go ahead and try this, with as few interviews as you're getting you have nothing left to lose, that is, you cannot get any fewer interviews than you do now so you may as well try something different.
Bloodheart
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,194
Location: Newcastle, England.
In terms of corporate culture, it's a homeless charity so I'd hope they'd be understanding of disabilities. In all fairness in my last job I could have passed as NT, as it is now I cannot thus it would be nice to be open with employers and staff...but I don't get why no one (including my disability adviser at the job centre and a new program I'm on aimed at helping disabled people back into work) has suggested this to me before
Good you have that to give to explain the gap in employment - I'm a bit stuck, I've been trying to get volunteer work to fill in the gap with no avail, had a temporary work placement, and I guess if I said I was a Housewife that's not exactly a lie.
_________________
Bloodheart
Good-looking girls break hearts, and goodhearted girls mend them.
Yes I have ticked this box on three occasions. Although I think with my University qualifications I would probably have been selected for interview regardless. It never seems to actually help though, as employers think of things like communication and teamwork as essential job skills and if you don't have them you don't have them, they do not care about Asperger's (or have no understanding, or knowledge of it). No-one's ever asked for any kind of proof of my disability/diagnosis. But I guess the guide to whether you need to tick this box is whether you do have substantial difficulties, for example if you go to interview after interview and your difficulties lead to continued rejection. From your description I would say to go for it. At least it gets you some interview experience.
The last occasion was not long ago actually. It was for a job within Government/Civil Service. I requested as reasonable adjustment at interview to have the questions in writing prior to the interview, and the interview panel to be made aware (so they could give due consideration/reasonable adjustments in respect of my difficulties). The requests were met, and interview questions provided. However, 2 days later a new set of questions replacing the last were provided, including questions about competencies not covered in the last set – “team working”, and “customer appreciation”. Competencies someone with Asperger's would reasonably be expected to have difficulties with compared with a non-disabled individual, given they inherently involve social interaction. At the time, despite considering the questions difficult to answer, I made my best effort, and did not consider it may be a means to discriminate against my Asperger’s. I thought the provision of the questions showed they were understanding and considerate, as I have heard of many employers refusing to do this claiming it gives an unfair advantage to the candidate the questions are revealed to.
Post interview feedback was, quote:
Candidate lacked evidence of some of the key competencies needed for such a senior position, notably team working and customer appreciation.
I feel that their feedback indicates in terms of technical ability I was suitable for the job, and that I was rejected purely for reasons relating to my disability. I feel the employer failed to adequately consider reasonable adjustments, and that a reasonable adjustment at recruitment would be to consider competencies relating to my disability as meeting expectations (assuming effective reasonable adjustments could be made to accommodate those difficulties). On offering an interview the employer offered, among a list of other adjustments, a sign language interpreter. I feel this proves the employer was able and willing to meet similar reasonable adjustments to those I would require, for other disabilities.
I had hoped that the employer would be more understanding of my difficulties, particularly as I explicitly requested they be told about them.
At present I am considering my position on taking this issue to an employment tribunal for disability discrimination.
I've applied for a few jobs where they guarantee an interview to anyone who meets the minimum criteria and presents with a disability. I've always wondered whether they genuinely want to consider hiring disabled people or whether they just want to be able to boast about their equal opportunity employment procedures. My father used to work for local government and he said they loved people with very minor 'disabilities' - things like missing a few fingers or one eye - cause it made their 'equal opportunity employer' percentages for hiring crips look great without them having to make any real effort to accommodate someone with genuine severe disabilities. So I'm not sure really...
I'd imagine that for computer-y type jobs, some employers might be enlightened enough to see the possible advantages of employing people on the autistic spectrum. And for some other jobs, employers might unconsciously discriminate against you due to their own wrong preconceptions of what being on the autistic spectrum actually means.
Last year I applied for two almost identical jobs with two different companies. As a very crude experiment, on one application form I ticked the disabled box, on the other I didn't. I got both jobs. Probably also worth mentioning is that both positions were crap menial labour that they could have trained lobotomised afghan hounds to carry out, so most likely neither employer gave a s**t one way or the other...
Well I think the reason for this is that people over-value social skills, and that interviews, which require social skills, are considered the only way to select someone for employment. I think given the opportunity to show their potential to an employer, many Aspies could do particularly well and employers would want to employ them.
Having never had a job due to my AS though, not like I am the person to comment on these issues.

