Guns in the Workplace
lotuspuppy
Veteran
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 995
Location: On a journey to the center of the mind
With the mass shooting epidemic in the U.S, I felt that now was a good time to address guns in the workplace.
A few months ago, I was having a corporate luncheon, and my boss mentioned that she brought her gun to work everyday. She slept with her gun nightly, and brought it in her purse wherever she went. As she owned her own company, she had every right to do this. The thing is that it sort of creeped me out. A few employees said that made them feel safe, but I expressed shock.
I personally feel a gun has no place in the workplace, except with a security guard. The workplace is a volatile place as it is, and I feel it is all too easy for an armed person to shoot a colleague in a sudden fit of passion. I would much rather be fired than fired on.
I also am not sure a gun can provide security if a mass shooter enters. If someone else has a gun, an armed colleague may try to exchange fire, but lack training. He may be a coward and run away, which is also what I would do. Or he may try to shoot me instead. There are many bosses and colleagues who would love an excuse to get rid of someone they didn't like.
There are just too many variables in the workplace to make me feel safe with a gun around. I believe professionals are the best source of security, and if security is that important to your business, find an office building with an armed guard or two.
That said, other colleagues and some of my relatives have said guns in the workplace make them feel safer. I want your opinion on it.
I have to agree with you. No one is perfect. There's always that one particular day when the stars align themselves the right way and the gun owner suddenly goes on a rampage. It could happen. It could also happen that someone else knows of the gun's presence and uses it to settle a score. Way too many variables to get right. Three shooting incidents on the same day at three different gun shows in three different states? Sounds like a movie but it happened yesterday. What next? Guns in church? Sing along with the organist NOW or get shot? Bizarre.
_________________
One Day At A Time.
His first book: http://www.amazon.com/Wetland-Other-Sto ... B00E0NVTL2
His second book: https://www.amazon.com/COMMONER-VAGABON ... oks&sr=1-2
His blog: http://seattlewordsmith.wordpress.com/
Preparing for a mass shooter at all is ridiculous. Your chance of dying in any sort of mass shooting is literally in the magnitude of one in a million, higher than plane crashes, train accidents, etc. So stop worrying about a mass shooting at all, as it's frankly just totally irrelevant.
That said, if management is OK with it, and the people have legal permits, I'm fine with it. I used to work as a delivery driver, I was too young/generally unable to carry any sort of weapons, I only worked for a short time as one, but my friend who worked at the place longer got robbed at least 2 or 3 times. Had to be in some sketchy neighborhoods. A bigger issue is getting robbed from the storefront also. If I'm working at, say, a small convenient store, and the manager trusts me with a firearm, yeah. You also gotta keep in mind after work or out in the parking lot/neighborhood, you could get robbed, too. I guess you could keep the gun in the car, but if you don't have a car, then it has to stay on you. In the car it could also have a higher chance of getting stolen than if it's on your person, as people break into cars more than they rob people personally.
I'm fine if a company wishes to prevent guns from being carried by their employees on company grounds, it's within their rights to do so. If the manager or whatever does think it's a volatile place to work or whatever, and he sees it as a concern, then yeah, fine with that. But as far as legislating it or whatever, no.
The thing with security guards, too, as in the case of a small restaurant or convenience store, guards cost money. If the manager trusts an employee with a firearm, or himself, he doesn't have to hire an extra security guard, saves him money. To hire a security guard from a firm, it'd probably cost him $15-20 an hour, compared to a normal employee he could pay $10, or carry himself and cost zero.
Besides the "practical" issues like that, I pretty much don't care. I'm not scared of firearms or firearm owners. If the person with a firearm at work keeps it not seen or heard, I'm fine with it. If he's a jackass and has a threatening demeanor and keeps showing it off to people and whatever, that's an issue. But in that case he's just a jackass anyway, and good management would fire this person, or if he's making threats or something to that affect, call the police. Besides, people already theoretically can kill one another in most jobs, anyway, in a kitchen you got knives, in a packing or unloading industry you have boxcutters you could slice someone very bad with, and so far there's not too many rampages of chef stabbings or anything like that.
If someone's setting out to kill someone, they will not care about whatever secondary policies are in place if they're ignoring the laws against murder. Like someone who worked at a shop in the Empire State Building last year. He lived in NJ. Guns are very heavily restricted there. So he stole one. Then he went to New York City where guns are even more restricted than NJ, and shot a coworker and himself. The laws and policies didn't prevent him from doing anything.
Since this'll likely delve into a gun control debate, guns are damned near impossible to eliminate. Prisoners have made .32ACP submachineguns in their prison metal shops, and even zipguns out of pipe using ground up matchheads for powder that could shoot a AA battery through a steel prison door. All the laws in the world will not get rid of guns, the cat is out of the bag. I feel it's better for the general public to own them, rather than having gun ownership only confined to criminals and the government.
A few months ago, I was having a corporate luncheon, and my boss mentioned that she brought her gun to work everyday. She slept with her gun nightly, and brought it in her purse wherever she went. As she owned her own company, she had every right to do this. The thing is that it sort of creeped me out. A few employees said that made them feel safe, but I expressed shock.
I personally feel a gun has no place in the workplace, except with a security guard. The workplace is a volatile place as it is, and I feel it is all too easy for an armed person to shoot a colleague in a sudden fit of passion. I would much rather be fired than fired on.
I also am not sure a gun can provide security if a mass shooter enters. If someone else has a gun, an armed colleague may try to exchange fire, but lack training. He may be a coward and run away, which is also what I would do. Or he may try to shoot me instead. There are many bosses and colleagues who would love an excuse to get rid of someone they didn't like.
There are just too many variables in the workplace to make me feel safe with a gun around. I believe professionals are the best source of security, and if security is that important to your business, find an office building with an armed guard or two.
That said, other colleagues and some of my relatives have said guns in the workplace make them feel safer. I want your opinion on it.
I think the correct term would be a "Sudden fit of Rage" rather than "Passion"
But regardless, I don't think guns should be around o_O
_________________
If you believe in anything, believe in yourself. Only then will your life remain your own.
Author/Writer
cyberscan
Veteran

Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,296
Location: Near Panama, City Florida
Before there was the widespread use of concealed carry permits, I worked for a week in the seedy area of Atlanta. I felt safe in the many small businesses there simply because all of the employees were armed. If I were to feel threatened, I would simply walk into one of these small businesses. I never had trouble or felt threatened.
_________________
I am AUTISTIC - Always Unique, Totally Interesting, Straight Talking, Intelligently Conversational.
I am also the author of "Tech Tactics Money Saving Secrets" and "Tech Tactics Publishing and Production Secrets."
lotuspuppy
Veteran
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 995
Location: On a journey to the center of the mind
I do think there are some exceptions. 1000 Knives brought up truck drivers who work in unsafe neighborhoods, and I do think they should carry a gun if it makes them feel safer. Airline pilots often carry guns, and while there is the risk of depressurizing the cabin, it is preferable to a plane hijacking, IMO.
But for an every day office or factory worker, I don't think we should allow guns. You are less likely to get shot in a suburban office park than as a freight delivery driver in Anacostia, or the South Side of Chicago, or other dangerous neighborhoods.
I would happily work in such a place and not feel unsafe at all.
I've been in many places where concealed carry is the norm, I have a permit to conceal carry. I've never felt unsafe at all. Texas, Arizona, Florida, Pennsylvania, Vermont, New Hampshire, Oregon, Washington, North Carolina, Virginia, Delaware are some of the states I've been in that have liberal carry laws. Never seen any blood in the streets, never seen any shoot outs at the ok-coral, anything like that. I did see a girl running across a parking lot at midnight with a guy chasing her yelling for help, and as I clicked the lock off the holster, I saw they were just racing and she was yelling help for some dumbass reason. No cops to be seen anywhere.
I work in a school, and I do feel unsafe at work at times. I know that the only thing stopping a criminal is a small sign that says "No firearms allowed." I highly doubt this sign will stop him.
Also what if you think thinking of ways to die is fun.
You do know that people with permits to carry have one of the lowest crime rates in the country. Pointing a gun at someone is a crime called brandishing and will get your permit revoked for life.
I am not sure there is causality in the lowest crime rate among concealed carry holders. If we take away criminals from concealed carry permits and don't allow them to have them wouldn't that be sampling without replacement and cause a group where you kicked criminals out of to have a lower crime rate unless there was a large external factor making there be more criminals in that group to start with. If I take a group of people and throw the criminals out then wouldn't that usually have a lower crime rate unless there was a representative sample.