Page 2 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

victorytea
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2011
Age: 79
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

17 Nov 2014, 7:57 pm

Louise88 , that makes sense to me- I was wondering the same thing. Paul



momsparky
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,772

18 Nov 2014, 1:49 pm

Louise88 wrote:
Stims aren't always positive things. I teach an autistic child on a private tuition basis and I don't allow him to stim in class, because the more he stims, the more he needs to and it reduces his concentration and performance.


I obviously don't know the child in question, so things could be different in the case you describe - but at least in my personal experience part of the reason for stimming is to allow me to focus. It doesn't look like traditional focus (well, I suppose when I used to pace, most people associate pacing with thinking, so that wasn't too bad) but if you take the stim away from me, I will be focused on not being able to do it, not on what I am supposed to be doing.

If the stimming is a symptom of a particular need not being met, then I could see where meeting that need would be important, and the stim stopping would be a barometer for how well you've addressed the need...but it could also be that the child is putting five times the effort into not-stimming than he's putting into classwork.

Stims that are harmful don't apply in this equation, of course - those need to be redirected somehow.