step son has autism, mother is doing nothing!!

Page 2 of 3 [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1026
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

10 Oct 2015, 10:24 am

Waterfalls wrote:
I didn't see anything evil, just someone trying to make he point that this OP who is a stepmom isn't messed up for wanting to have rules and structure that create what seems to her a good home for herself, her husband, his child, and any other household members. Also I got the impression she is supporting the priorities the child's father has.


I would agree with you, but for that one phrase "she has a right to expect the kid to stop or not visit all together." That sentiment is evil, as I understand it.

I think traven over-reacted to what might be implied by the OP, rather than waiting for more information and whatamess over-reacted to traven's post.

I don't think the OP was asking for that and I don't think the OP was trolling and generally agree with what you have written.



InThisTogether
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2012
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,709
Location: USA

10 Oct 2015, 10:34 am

YippySkippy wrote:
"I don't like my husband's ex, and their kid is fat."
There, that's the short version of what you said.
Your husband can't even be bothered to live in the same state as his son, so....yeah. :roll:


Huh...I feel like we are not even reading the same post.

What I read is "my husband's ex is not taking care of their kid. The therapist has expressed concerns about it. What are we supposed to do?"

It is possible that the family originally lived in NJ and the mom moved to be closer to her family (or whatever) and the father cannot afford child support if he moves to OH. My point is, we don't have a lot of information, so judging does not seem helpful.

If your husband has honest reason to believe the mother is abusing drugs/alcohol to a degree that it is impairing her ability to parent, he has to take action. To not do so in unconscionable, IMHO. Just because he does not have custody does not mean he is still not responsible for the well-being of his children. Alcoholics/drug abusers are not often able to maintain a household that is conducive to parenting, let alone single parenting a child on the spectrum.

As with any divorce, the kids' needs need to come first. All decisions should be made based on what is best for the kids. What is best for the parents needs to be of secondary concern, after the kids' needs have been addressed. Sounds to me that your husband needs to seek legal advice if your suspicions are true.


_________________
Mom to 2 exceptional atypical kids
Long BAP lineage


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

10 Oct 2015, 10:36 am

Adamantium wrote:
Waterfalls wrote:
I didn't see anything evil, just someone trying to make he point that this OP who is a stepmom isn't messed up for wanting to have rules and structure that create what seems to her a good home for herself, her husband, his child, and any other household members. Also I got the impression she is supporting the priorities the child's father has.


I would agree with you, but for that one phrase "she has a right to expect the kid to stop or not visit all together." That sentiment is evil, as I understand it.


Where did you see that sentence at? I re read the post again and couldn't find it. I also read it slowly look out for it and still didn't see it.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

10 Oct 2015, 10:40 am

InThisTogether wrote:
YippySkippy wrote:
"I don't like my husband's ex, and their kid is fat."
There, that's the short version of what you said.
Your husband can't even be bothered to live in the same state as his son, so....yeah. :roll:


Huh...I feel like we are not even reading the same post.

What I read is "my husband's ex is not taking care of their kid. The therapist has expressed concerns about it. What are we supposed to do?"

It is possible that the family originally lived in NJ and the mom moved to be closer to her family (or whatever) and the father cannot afford child support if he moves to OH. My point is, we don't have a lot of information, so judging does not seem helpful.

If your husband has honest reason to believe the mother is abusing drugs/alcohol to a degree that it is impairing her ability to parent, he has to take action. To not do so in unconscionable, IMHO. Just because he does not have custody does not mean he is still not responsible for the well-being of his children. Alcoholics/drug abusers are not often able to maintain a household that is conducive to parenting, let alone single parenting a child on the spectrum.

As with any divorce, the kids' needs need to come first. All decisions should be made based on what is best for the kids. What is best for the parents needs to be of secondary concern, after the kids' needs have been addressed. Sounds to me that your husband needs to seek legal advice if your suspicions are true.


Whew I thought I was going crazy because it seemed like everyone had read a different post than me. But I am glad I am not the only one.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


InThisTogether
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2012
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,709
Location: USA

10 Oct 2015, 10:53 am

League_Girl wrote:
InThisTogether wrote:
YippySkippy wrote:
"I don't like my husband's ex, and their kid is fat."
There, that's the short version of what you said.
Your husband can't even be bothered to live in the same state as his son, so....yeah. :roll:


Huh...I feel like we are not even reading the same post.

What I read is "my husband's ex is not taking care of their kid. The therapist has expressed concerns about it. What are we supposed to do?"

It is possible that the family originally lived in NJ and the mom moved to be closer to her family (or whatever) and the father cannot afford child support if he moves to OH. My point is, we don't have a lot of information, so judging does not seem helpful.

If your husband has honest reason to believe the mother is abusing drugs/alcohol to a degree that it is impairing her ability to parent, he has to take action. To not do so in unconscionable, IMHO. Just because he does not have custody does not mean he is still not responsible for the well-being of his children. Alcoholics/drug abusers are not often able to maintain a household that is conducive to parenting, let alone single parenting a child on the spectrum.

As with any divorce, the kids' needs need to come first. All decisions should be made based on what is best for the kids. What is best for the parents needs to be of secondary concern, after the kids' needs have been addressed. Sounds to me that your husband needs to seek legal advice if your suspicions are true.


Whew I thought I was going crazy because it seemed like everyone had read a different post than me. But I am glad I am not the only one.


There's always the possibility that we are just crazy together! :P But I, too, had to go back and re-read the post because I felt like somehow got swooshed over to a parallel world with a different OP when I was reading the responses. There seems to be a serious disconnect to me.


_________________
Mom to 2 exceptional atypical kids
Long BAP lineage


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1026
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

10 Oct 2015, 11:00 am

League_Girl wrote:
Adamantium wrote:
Waterfalls wrote:
I didn't see anything evil, just someone trying to make he point that this OP who is a stepmom isn't messed up for wanting to have rules and structure that create what seems to her a good home for herself, her husband, his child, and any other household members. Also I got the impression she is supporting the priorities the child's father has.


I would agree with you, but for that one phrase "she has a right to expect the kid to stop or not visit all together." That sentiment is evil, as I understand it.


Where did you see that sentence at? I re read the post again and couldn't find it. I also read it slowly look out for it and still didn't see it.


My comment was about whatamess's response to traven, here: viewtopic.php?f=19&t=295336#p6811255

Can you see it now?

By pointing out the problems I see in that thinking, I do not endorse traven's post or attribute whatamess's position to the OP.



traven
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Sep 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,361

10 Oct 2015, 11:03 am

Quote:
If your husband has honest reason to believe the mother is abusing drugs/alcohol to a degree that it is impairing her ability to parent, he has to take action. To not do so in unconscionable, IMHO. Just because he does not have custody does not mean he is still not responsible for the well-being of his children. Alcoholics/drug abusers are not often able to maintain a household that is conducive to parenting, let alone single parenting a child on the spectrum.

As with any divorce, the kids' needs need to come first. All decisions should be made based on what is best for the kids. What is best for the parents needs to be of secondary concern, after the kids' needs have been addressed. Sounds to me that your husband needs to seek legal advice if your suspicions are true.


This might be the best point to start from.

Sorry for the uproar but it's hard to see intentions from a screen, and making autism an excuse for interfering is a big no, imo. If the situation is bad, it is bad, no matter with or without autism.



Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1026
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

10 Oct 2015, 11:20 am

traven wrote:
Quote:
If your husband has honest reason to believe the mother is abusing drugs/alcohol to a degree that it is impairing her ability to parent, he has to take action. To not do so in unconscionable, IMHO. Just because he does not have custody does not mean he is still not responsible for the well-being of his children. Alcoholics/drug abusers are not often able to maintain a household that is conducive to parenting, let alone single parenting a child on the spectrum.

As with any divorce, the kids' needs need to come first. All decisions should be made based on what is best for the kids. What is best for the parents needs to be of secondary concern, after the kids' needs have been addressed. Sounds to me that your husband needs to seek legal advice if your suspicions are true.


This might be the best point to start from.

Sorry for the uproar but it's hard to see intentions from a screen, and making autism an excuse for interfering is a big no, imo. If the situation is bad, it is bad, no matter with or without autism.


But even the language you have quoted takes into account that autism is a factor for consideration:
Quote:
Alcoholics/drug abusers are not often able to maintain a household that is conducive to parenting, let alone single parenting a child on the spectrum.



traven
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Sep 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,361

10 Oct 2015, 12:30 pm

I had a problem with that sentence but left the quote like that. But it's also a judgement problem.(here it's prescribed drugs and possibly alcohol, but what do we know?)(and it states abuse and not use) The autism statement is not from me, it depends, maybe, idk, would you consider the mother being on the spectrum and not living up to standards? Or needing help with coping?

I'm a step(grand)mother too, but the child went to his grandmother and later to a childless couple, where he was at his place, and that stayed like that when we later became a couple.



Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1026
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

10 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm

InThisTogether wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
InThisTogether wrote:
YippySkippy wrote:
"I don't like my husband's ex, and their kid is fat."
There, that's the short version of what you said.
Your husband can't even be bothered to live in the same state as his son, so....yeah. :roll:


Huh...I feel like we are not even reading the same post.

What I read is "my husband's ex is not taking care of their kid. The therapist has expressed concerns about it. What are we supposed to do?"

It is possible that the family originally lived in NJ and the mom moved to be closer to her family (or whatever) and the father cannot afford child support if he moves to OH. My point is, we don't have a lot of information, so judging does not seem helpful.

If your husband has honest reason to believe the mother is abusing drugs/alcohol to a degree that it is impairing her ability to parent, he has to take action. To not do so in unconscionable, IMHO. Just because he does not have custody does not mean he is still not responsible for the well-being of his children. Alcoholics/drug abusers are not often able to maintain a household that is conducive to parenting, let alone single parenting a child on the spectrum.

As with any divorce, the kids' needs need to come first. All decisions should be made based on what is best for the kids. What is best for the parents needs to be of secondary concern, after the kids' needs have been addressed. Sounds to me that your husband needs to seek legal advice if your suspicions are true.


Whew I thought I was going crazy because it seemed like everyone had read a different post than me. But I am glad I am not the only one.


There's always the possibility that we are just crazy together! :P But I, too, had to go back and re-read the post because I felt like somehow got swooshed over to a parallel world with a different OP when I was reading the responses. There seems to be a serious disconnect to me.


I think what happened has to do with the limited information in the OP.

Trying to understand it, some readers imagined themselves in the role of the step-mom and thought about what they would do in her shoes. Some other people imagined themselves in the role of the child and thought about how the interventions discussed by the step mom might seem.

There isn't enough in the OP to know what is going on, but I would agree with your statement "As with any divorce, the kids' needs need to come first." The kids needs are barely discussed in the OP. hence the requests for more information and the impassioned tangents. There are some great responses here, including ASDMommyASDKid and yours. I hope the Ndonahue1810 can take something good from them.



Fitzi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 545

10 Oct 2015, 12:54 pm

InThisTogether wrote:
YippySkippy wrote:
"I don't like my husband's ex, and their kid is fat."
There, that's the short version of what you said.
Your husband can't even be bothered to live in the same state as his son, so....yeah. :roll:


Huh...I feel like we are not even reading the same post.

What I read is "my husband's ex is not taking care of their kid. The therapist has expressed concerns about it. What are we supposed to do?"

It is possible that the family originally lived in NJ and the mom moved to be closer to her family (or whatever) and the father cannot afford child support if he moves to OH. My point is, we don't have a lot of information, so judging does not seem helpful.

If your husband has honest reason to believe the mother is abusing drugs/alcohol to a degree that it is impairing her ability to parent, he has to take action. To not do so in unconscionable, IMHO. Just because he does not have custody does not mean he is still not responsible for the well-being of his children. Alcoholics/drug abusers are not often able to maintain a household that is conducive to parenting, let alone single parenting a child on the spectrum.

As with any divorce, the kids' needs need to come first. All decisions should be made based on what is best for the kids. What is best for the parents needs to be of secondary concern, after the kids' needs have been addressed. Sounds to me that your husband needs to seek legal advice if your suspicions are true.


Honestly, my first reaction was to interpret it just like YippySkippy. Then, I thought to give her the benefit of the doubt, and had similar thoughts as yours. However, there was so many other (as I interpreted it, I could be wrong) bad divorce feelings/, us against her expressions in the mix, it was hard to know what was going on with the little actual information about the child.

I couldn't tell if the drug/ alcohol abuse was a real concern, or an exaggeration to support judgement against the mother. But, agree, if it is truly suspected, it is not ok to leave the kids there and I am confused as to why steps haven't been taken yet to address this. I also was not sure if the OP thinks the kid needs therapy because the kid is struggling with his Aspergers, or that the OP thought he needed therapy simply because he was immediately recognizable to her as someone who acts like he has Aspergers and therefore thought these Aspergery traits must require therapy.



HisMom
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,271

10 Oct 2015, 12:58 pm

Ndonahue1810 wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to this group/website and I'm looking for help and guidance regarding my step son and his mother who is not giving him proper support for his austisum needs.

He was diagnosed with aspergers at the age of 2.5 years old before I was in his life. After diagnoses my husband and his wife at the time did not purse any form of therapy or threatment. They were both negevie to his situation about what kind of care he really needed. because he is considered high functioning they thought he would grow out of his issues.

After my husband and I met, he introduced me to his children. I knew right away that his son was not like other kids. He Showed all signs of a kid with aspergers. After several talks he took the steps and found a therapist for him. My husband is suffering from a lot of guilt for not doing this sooner because his son is 9 now. But at least it was a step in the right direction.

We live in New Jersey because that's where our jobs are, his ex wife and kids live in Ohio. Due to the distance we only get to see his kids every 3 weeks on weekends and longer periods of time over the summer and holidays. We have speculated his ex wife to have an addiction to pain killers and/or Alcohol. We believe this because when the kids have called she occasionally is drunk in the background of FaceTime and has abused pain killers when my husband was married to her. She can't keep a job and is only responsible for taking care of the kids including taking their son to his doctors appointments and helping him at home and give him a structured life. She can't seem to do basic motherly duties which she constantly complains about and forget about a structured life, half the time the kids don't brush their teeth.

Recently we met with his sons therapist. His therapist informed us that the son has regressed for several reasons. She told his ex wife to start a schedule and a structure. Limit the iPad to 20 minutes per day, help guide him with his eating, etc. Absoutly none of these tasks are being implemented at home by his ex wife. The therapist had to refer her to another clinic that specializes in eating because she could not take direction from her. His wife is waiting for doctors to correct her son but is not willing to put any extra time in at home. Everything that we have been told to do by the therapist we have done even though we only get him every 3 weeks. His son only eats carbs and is gaining more and more weight. Like I mentioned in the beginning his son is highly functioning and when he is with us we see daily improvement, it's very frustrating to see him go back to Ohio and we have to start all over 3 weeks later.

My husband is worried about confronting his ex wife because he is worried it will set her off and she will go off the deep end and pull the kids in the middle of it.

As a woman this is very sad to me, I don't understand what kind of mother wouldn't want to do everything for their child. I've talked to my husband about getting full custody but we do not even know if this would hold up in court. How many judges will take 2 kids away from their mother? My husband offered to take the kids full time and she says no I can't live without the kids. I think she can't live without the child support.

I also don't want to see his children go through pain in a custody battle but if they continue in this situation i fear for their future as adults. Has anyone ever been in this situation before?
Any advice is greatly appreciated
Thank you,


What you think and what you believe of the child's mother are immaterial. If you weren't a party to this child's conception, then how his mother parents him is none of your business. It's your husband's child, and you don't get a say in things just because you waltzed down the aisle with his father, and he put a ring on your finger. You would also be very wise to keep your "speculation" that she is a drug addict and an alcoholic to yourself. Trash talking her like that constitutes defamation of her character and grounds for a civil action by her against you (and her ex, if he runs around making similar claims).

I would like to know how you know their mother is drunk at all times, cannot hold down a job, is "only" responsible for taking the kids to their doctors' appointments, is the cause for the child's regression or poor eating habits, is reliant on child support for her living and cannot perform even basic "motherly duties" ? I would like to know how she managed to keep full custody with only occasional visitation with their father despite her allegedly having a history of "abusing pain killers and alcohol" ? Your story does not add up, love. Judges that sit in family courts have seen it all, and there's NO way that she would have received full custody of her children if she were having - as you allege - issues with substance abuse.

Also, unless you have a secret camera in your home and / or a crystal ball idling in your garage, you have NO idea if she is "not fulfilling her motherly duties and is the cause for his regression". Some kids on the spectrum have a very limited diet due to sensory issues - for instance, for a long time, my son would only eat one food. How do you know that the mother is not implementing the "therapist's" ideas and recommendations at home ? My son has also had frequent gains and even more frequent regressions. Nothing that I could a damn thing about, even though I tried my hardest and my darndest to help him progress.

Thank God I didn't have to contend with a nosy, opinionated, interfering busybody of a stepmother like you, getting ideas about how everything is MY fault, how I am an unfit mother, and a sorrier excuse for a human being.

Let me repeat it for you - if you weren't a party to that kid's conception, you need to butt out and stay out. This is your husband's child with another woman, and further, since your husband only sees this kid for one weekend every three weeks, this isn't any of your business. It's not like you have joint custody or sole custody where this kid is living with you on a part-time or full-time basis, and where you actually do spend your time and energy parenting him. Your husband cutting out a check for the kid, and seeing him maybe about once a month or so, does not make you his "mother". So stay out of the mother's business and stop defaming her.


_________________
O villain, villain, smiling, damnèd villain!
My tables—meet it is I set it down
That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain.
At least I'm sure it may be so in "Denmark".

-- Hamlet, 1.5.113-116


momsparky
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,772

10 Oct 2015, 1:08 pm

League_Girl wrote:
I had to read the OP again because I couldn't understand any of the responses here so I thought I misread the post. What I saw in the post was a wife being concerned because the mother isn't helping her son and not listening to the doctor. The wife and her husband are trying to help him but with the inconstancy, it makes it hard and it's true for any child. She mentioned full custody to her husband but he is afraid to do anything about it because of how his ex would react.

Only thing I can think of is if your husband can try and get a job in Ohio so you both can move closer and hopefully have more custody of the kids but it's tough trying to be a parent when the other parent isn't being consistent with your parenting.

To people who say it isn't her business:

When you are married to someone with kids or in a long term relationship, their kids become your business and responsibility. Don't want it, don't marry someone who already has kids or get in a relationship with someone who has them. Especially if you don't want this possibly drama.


This. I'm not seeing any nefarius intent behind this woman's email other than a worry that the child's needs are not being met because the child's therapist reported that the mother is not implementing any supports. That, to me, suggests that there is at least a real reason for concern. It implies that the mother knows there are needs (she's taking the child to the therapist) but isn't meeting them, per the therapist's report.

If there is alcohol/drug abuse, that is easily a reason why things are not going well at home, and definitely a concern for the non-custodial family for ALL the kids, not just the child on the spectrum.

As to why the stepparent is posting here and not the father - she's the one who saw the need for therapy, she's apparently been validated by a professional, and obviously cares for the child enough to advocate for him with her husband - a difficult thing to do as a stepparent.

Yes, there may well be more to this, but maybe we could start approaching new posters' posts with an assumption that their intentions are good? We really benefit no one by filling two pages with accusations - all that does is make the OP go away. How about responding with some suggestions on how to manage a blended family with a child on the spectrum? I know we have posters here who fit that description.

OP: hang in there. I wonder if you and your husband can get mediation to ensure the kids are safe? It's an interim step before going in for custody, and may at least get you better information than you have now - sounds like you are working off of a gut feeling and need more concrete evidence of what's going on. As a co-parent, the child's father does have a right to step in if he feels his son's health is at risk.



momsparky
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,772

10 Oct 2015, 1:13 pm

Wanted to add: if you look at the OP's profile, she says she has been diagnosed with AS. That would tend to corroborate my view that she's concerned about the child and not trying to disrupt her husband's relationship with his ex.



InThisTogether
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2012
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,709
Location: USA

10 Oct 2015, 1:38 pm

HisMom wrote:
Judges that sit in family courts have seen it all, and there's NO way that she would have received full custody of her children if she were having - as you allege - issues with substance abuse.


Unfortunately for kids everywhere, that is not always true. There are still judges out there who believe that a child's best interest is in living with his/her mother, without any recognition whatsoever that not all women make good mothers. Not all mothers are fit mothers. There are many "functional" drug/alcohol abusers out there, who are "functional" because they are able to keep their abuse hidden. To pretend that it is impossible that this could be happening here is naïve, IMHO. I have seen more than one incident, personally, where the child's needs would be best met by living with the father, but the courts did not see it that way. Often, it is a matter of who has a better lawyer (winner), or who first decides that spending every penny of their child's future is not the best way to proceed, when they know they will lose in the long run anyway (loser).

Judges and courts are not infallible, and sadly, many are swayed by their own personal experience or opinions. Or outdated notions, such as "children belong with their mothers." Children belong with whomever will best meet their needs. Saying children belong with their mothers assumes that all mothers are good mothers, and they are not. It also assumes that all mothers are better caregivers than fathers, and that is also not true. Some fathers are, by far, the more suitable parent.

Lastly, when someone chooses to marry a person with a child, they do not get to take a hand's off approach. They become a part of that child's life. Many steps (children and parents) enjoy a deep and abiding love for one another. Even when they don't, the step most likely has a deep and abiding love for the parent, so expecting someone not to care what is happening is unreasonable. I am not saying they should not respect the role of the other parent. But I am saying that to ignore the fact that they do have a role is not realistic. They do.

We have someone here who is trying to get help. Blasting her is not going to help her, nor the kid, if indeed he is in an inappropriate environment.


_________________
Mom to 2 exceptional atypical kids
Long BAP lineage


HisMom
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,271

10 Oct 2015, 2:02 pm

momsparky wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
I had to read the OP again because I couldn't understand any of the responses here so I thought I misread the post. What I saw in the post was a wife being concerned because the mother isn't helping her son and not listening to the doctor. The wife and her husband are trying to help him but with the inconstancy, it makes it hard and it's true for any child. She mentioned full custody to her husband but he is afraid to do anything about it because of how his ex would react.

Only thing I can think of is if your husband can try and get a job in Ohio so you both can move closer and hopefully have more custody of the kids but it's tough trying to be a parent when the other parent isn't being consistent with your parenting.

To people who say it isn't her business:

When you are married to someone with kids or in a long term relationship, their kids become your business and responsibility. Don't want it, don't marry someone who already has kids or get in a relationship with someone who has them. Especially if you don't want this possibly drama.


This. I'm not seeing any nefarius intent behind this woman's email other than a worry that the child's needs are not being met because the child's therapist reported that the mother is not implementing any supports. That, to me, suggests that there is at least a real reason for concern. It implies that the mother knows there are needs (she's taking the child to the therapist) but isn't meeting them, per the therapist's report.

If there is alcohol/drug abuse, that is easily a reason why things are not going well at home, and definitely a concern for the non-custodial family for ALL the kids, not just the child on the spectrum.

As to why the stepparent is posting here and not the father - she's the one who saw the need for therapy, she's apparently been validated by a professional, and obviously cares for the child enough to advocate for him with her husband - a difficult thing to do as a stepparent.

Yes, there may well be more to this, but maybe we could start approaching new posters' posts with an assumption that their intentions are good? We really benefit no one by filling two pages with accusations - all that does is make the OP go away. How about responding with some suggestions on how to manage a blended family with a child on the spectrum? I know we have posters here who fit that description.

OP: hang in there. I wonder if you and your husband can get mediation to ensure the kids are safe? It's an interim step before going in for custody, and may at least get you better information than you have now - sounds like you are working off of a gut feeling and need more concrete evidence of what's going on. As a co-parent, the child's father does have a right to step in if he feels his son's health is at risk.


I am all for giving posters - old or new - the benefit of the doubt.

What particularly ticked me off with this OP's post was the laundry list of accusations about the custodial parent's lack of parenting abilities, and her alleged addiction to alcohol and / or potential substance abuse. My take came from my information that family court judges are quick to pick up on any individual's (in)ability to parent. Even if - as InThisTogether points out - this is a naive / silly assumption on my part, and judges are as fallible as the rest of us - then it would behoove the OP's husband, who apparently considers himself a loving, caring parent to bring that up at a custody hearing and to ask for full custody or at least partial custody of his kids. The onus of ensuring our children's well being is ultimately with us, even if the family court did not support us. You do what you have to do - hire a pitbull of an attorney, subpoena Mom's medical records, document incidents and incident reports filed by the children's schools or private therapists, drive to Ohio every weekend - you do what you have to do to be as involved with your children as is possible, especially when you are alleging that your ex has drug abuse issues. However, not only did that not seem to have happened, but also Dad - in his infinite wisdom and despite his supposed misgivings about Mom's "issues" - chooses to live out of state AND only sees his children about once a month.

I am sorry, but to me "job stability", "income issues" blah blah blah are just excuses. You can find a job anywhere if you try hard enough. It may not be easy (hey, life isn't fair or easy, is it ?), but it is possible. Your priority should have been those kids with a druggie for an ex, but nope.. Daddy CHOOSES to see Kids once a month.

IMO, that just does not add up with the OP's claim that her husband is the "better parent". What is even more telling is that he - even now, with suspicions of the ex's alcohol and substance abuse issues rising - is unwilling to take the ex back to court for full custody. The excuse given is that the father and his current wife don't "want to put the kids through a nasty custody battle", when it is probably MORE harmful for children to stay with a parent with substance abuse issues than to be embroiled in a nasty custody dispute. Get my drift ?

So, given what the OP admits to in HER own post, at best, the OP and her husband have poor judgment where those children are concerned, believing it is better to leave kids with a druggie and a drunk, rather than involve them in a custody dispute. OR, at worst, this couple is not telling the whole truth and this has NOTHING to do with the mother's alleged (in)ability to parent, and everything to do with the size of the checks being cut and sent to her every month (note allegation by OP that Mom needs the support checks to live on) !

I would have probably responded very differently had the OP said that she was concerned about her husband's son and asked for help / advise on how to help the boy, as opposed to devoting the majority of her post to dissing his mother. I am aware that there are some loving, caring stepmothers and stepfathers out there, and I tip my bonnet off to them for stepping in and raising a child who is not their own flesh and blood, but I will have to stick with my belief - based on her own words here - that this woman is probably not one of them.


_________________
O villain, villain, smiling, damnèd villain!
My tables—meet it is I set it down
That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain.
At least I'm sure it may be so in "Denmark".

-- Hamlet, 1.5.113-116


Last edited by HisMom on 10 Oct 2015, 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.