Should aspies have children?
Tough stuff.
I think this is like saying controlled fusion is just a few decades away, as people have been doing since the 1960s.
I'm pretty sure we don't know nearly enough about DNA to say such a thing with any confidence. People don't really understand how genes are regulated in most cases and are just starting to tease apart they way methylation can inactivate a gene or how it is that a single nucleotide change at one locus can cause a profound effect in an organism while the deletion or reversal of a few hundred thousand bases in another place can have no discernable impact. We have a map of the code and we have a pretty good idea of how some parts of the code can be transcribed into RNA which is then translated into proteins--but the reality that the same sequence can be used in different ways by different cells. The genome is a thing of mind-boggling complexity and we are just beginning to cut through it's mysteries with our analytical explorations.
The scientists and practitioners of a few generations from now will probably look back on our understanding of these mechanisms as a physicist researching quantum mechanical effects looks back on Newton's mechanical universe. What we have learned is wondrous and that we have looked this deeply into this awesome complexity and found the underlying order that we have is exhilarating, but there is clearly much. much more to understand. The rate of change is increasing exponentially, so 20 years may put such manipulations in our grasp, but then again, it may not. 3.2gigabases of information is a lot to process, particularly when we just don't know what most of it does...
If we did have the understanding and ability to make such modifications in the germline, how would you feel about making use of that knowledge? How do you gauge the ethics of this possibility?
Out of the fire pan and into the fire; I would worry about creating more problems than there already are...
Aside from the technical issues, there are some major ethical issues to tackle on the road to technology aimed at gene selection. We're still grappling with the ethics of abortion. Experimenting with genes runs the risk of creating humans with very serious medical and developmental problems. It's impossible to fully understand genes enough to do such work therapeutically without experimentation, and it's impossible to do those experiments without making a few mistakes along the way. There are so many horrible things that happen in nature when genes get messed up. As one example, consider Lesch Nyhan syndrome - one gene goes wrong and you wind up with intellectual disability and constant excruciating pain that causes people to bite their own lips and fingers off. Gene experimentation on humans runs so many awful risks that I can't imagine the benefits would be worth it. But who knows, people may figure out ways around these issues...or the future eugenicists of the world may find a way to ignore the ethical problems and do it anyway.
Given the historical record, it seems likely that the experiments will be done, ethics be damned.
On the one hand, this knowledge may bring wonders and miracles, but on the other hand, to borrow a phrase from one of my favorite orators, we may yet "sink into the abyss of a new dark age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science."
Do I want children? Heck no, I don't want to have to deal with all that crap. Earth is overpopulated with humans as it is anyway.
Finally, somebody here has some sense, can't other people on the Wrong Planet tell that 7 billion people is too many?
A couple who has two children is only replacing themselves, not contributing to a higher population. If no couple had more than two kids the world's population would actually shrink, as some people would not want or not be able to have any children. In most first-world countries, most people are already choosing small families voluntarily. The population explosion is happening in places like India, where the majority of families are having many, many children. I think people who are concerned about overpopulation should focus their efforts there, and not on trying to convince people to abstain from parenthood completely.
China has the one child policy they put in 1979 and are they shrinking or growing? I know it has caused more female babies to be abandoned or aborted and the majority of babies in orphanages are female. It's sad to see in a 1995 documentary. They are left to die by being starved. Just to many of them to take care of and pay attention to. Even inmates are treated better than that in our country. It was disturbing what I saw in the video how those innocent children are treated. perhaps if they changed other laws like giving females the same rights as males and allowing females to keep their family name and leave it up to the man and women to decide if they want to keep their family name or change it. then that might help with the female population and right now they are having a female shortage so men are having a hard time finding a woman now to keep their families going.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
I have a mild case of AS. I love children, and I would like to be a mom when I grow up and marry. But the problem is, AS is genetic, so my kids may very well wind up with AS, and a lot worse than I have it. AS isn't a bad thing in and of itself when it's mild (hey, neurodiversity!), but would it be irresponsible to bring kids into this world knowing they might have problems from it?
Not to mention that if a country's replacement rate is too low, there end up being all sorts of issues with things like support for the aged. Immigration helps alleviate that somewhat, but there are a ton of political issues that make most countries reluctant to rely on it as a complete solution.
My boyfriend has Aspergers (I am NT as far as I know). We have a son (almost 3). He is autistic. Not married or living together, but we are committed. I don't think if an autistic couple has children, it's guaranteed the child will be autistic. Maybe better odds. 2 NTs can have a child with autism. I think it's up to the individual whether they want to raise a child or not.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Is 3 the magic number for children now? |
05 Jul 2025, 1:17 pm |
Anything wrong looking at children or young adult books? |
14 May 2025, 10:05 am |