makuranososhi wrote:
[N]euro[t]ypical; generally used to differentiate between those on the spectrum, and those who are not. There is difference of opinion, from what I have seen) whether individuals include others who are neurologically affected but are not on the spectrum are included in that category. Some people will use it in a derogatory manner; mostly, it is more of an adjective.
M.
Agreed. I've been thinking in such conversation, it might be more accurate to substitute
NA (Non-Autistic) than to try to differentiate between
Autistic and
Neurotypical, as 'typical' may be used to refer (incorrectly) to any number of people who while not Autistic per se, may also have neurological differences of their own, that affect their abilities to function in conventional social interaction.
BiPolar, for example, is neither Autistic nor neurotypical, yet is far from average, functionally. Also,
OCD is not neurotypical, though it bears marked
resemblances to certain Autistic dysfunctions and yet, is not generally considered to be on the Autism Spectrum.