gbollard wrote:
Doesn't institutionalization depend upon whether the individual can function without care and if not, whether that care (family etc) is readily available and able/capable of providing assistance?
Surely it's the families that are putting the affected person into an institution. (or the person may be checking themselves in).
or am I wrong?
Families were pressured not to get too attached to their kids because an institution was a better place for the kids and the families. It was how it was done, in the past. I think families didn't want to be the few freaky exceptions who kept their kids at home and I'm guessing that there were far less supports.
Now all kids are entitled to go to school but they had to be sued to get low functioning kids to be allowed in schools. This made it easier to have a day care for the kids. I guess that made it easier to keep the kids at home.
_________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.