Ganondox wrote:
Fnord wrote:
a) Fictional characters are not real.
b) Kirby is a fictional character.
: : Kirby is not real.
a) Autism is real.
b) Real people have autism.
: : Autism is a real condition had by real people.
a) Kirby is not real.
b) Autism is a real condition had by real people.
: : Kirby does not have autism.
QED
That is not how you logic. A->B does not imply B->A. Real people having autism does not exclude fictional characters from having autism.
Actually it is a form of reasoning, subjective logic. The proofs don;t have to be consistent to be valid. The argument isn;t sound by any means but it does pose a contingency being that in this world, a fictional character that was never stated in any situation to have autism is highly likely to not have it at all. Also Kirby, being not even human, probably had a different mental framework than that of a real human being (not pulled out of my ass, animals are presented to have different mentalities, why would Kirby not have one as well being...whatever he is? lol). Kirby can have autism, but not in my world or Fnord's. Or this one. Only OP's world