Grudge-Match

Post Reply New Topic

Who would win? The NRA or PETA...

In the interest of fairness PETA and their cronies outnumber the NRA three to one... and can only use ALF/ELF style weapons...

The NRA has every weapon they self-righteously believe patriotic Americans should be allowed to use...

The field has to be neutral territory... some sort of large hotel like a Best Western or Holiday Inn...

The field has to have a mixture of urban (PETA advantage) and natural (NRA advantage)...

Victory can only be seized by the total domination of one side by the other... nothing but an unconditional surrender or a massacre will lead to "victory"...

All tactics are acceptable... including assassination, hostages and the use of civilians (hotel staff, hotel guests, bystanders) as poker chips are ALL allowed...

The time limit on this match is 30 hours... after that period of time the SWAT team arrives lead by Alberto Gonzales (attorney general of the U.S.) and all participants are slaughtered like hogs...

Both teams are divided into similar lines... command (100 people), grunt( 400 people), light infantry (200 people), support (100 people), elite (100 people) and artillery (100 people)... only PETA has three times the personnel... the NRA has 1000, PETA has 3000...

The storyline is this... an NRA convention and an animal rights convention are held at the same convention hotel complex... tensions run higher and higher until violence inevitably erupts...

There are 10 000 civilians around the hotel complex... some can fight back if pushed... most cannot... a few cops, army reserve and martial artisits are hidden among the general public...

GAME ON!

What made you think of this??? Have you taken your medication lately?

hehe, I like this idea. One thing, though: what are they fighting for? I mean, what does the winner get? Does the loser have to stop their lobbying? Or, is it just fighting for the sake of fighting? (Middle East, anyone?)

To answer the question, I have every expectation that the NRA would win, especially if the NRA members play it smart and get their hunting dogs in the fray. Now that would create a real moral conflict for PETA: what to do with an animal that is trying to hurt/kill you.

It's just fighting for the sake of fighting (like anything in Iraq)...

I've always been a wargamer... my dad is a wargamer... and I like to simulate absurd battles in my head...

I've always been fascinated by stupid people... people whose entire perception of reality is contained within their own quasar-sized egos...

The NRA have the advanced weapons... but PETA has mindless brutality...

So it's like Vietnam... where PETA will mob down the NRA with guerilla attacks...

I personally think the NRA have the advantage... they have such over-powered guns...

Did you know that in America; you are legally allowed to own a .50 caliber anti-material rifle? As in: A sniper rifle designed to destroy helicopters and trucks!

I don't like the NRA... but they're a good pony to bet on... if only because they're the pony with a howitzer strapped to it...

Mmmmm, my favorite is the Barret M82A1... I've always wanted one of those. Why? Some might say it's overcompensation (I won't go into what they think I'm compensating for ), or maybe it's just because I like target shooting, and the bigger and badder the gun, the better. I could never use a gun on a person, though (or an animal, for that matter... I'd like to try hunting, but I don't think I could do it).

Getting back on topic...

Hmm, as I think about this more, I really have to wonder it the NRA would win. One advantage for PETA is that they appear to be more ruthless than the NRA, and I wonder how many NRA members could actually kill another person, while PETA (or ALF, anyways) tends to show much disregard for human life.

In the end, I think everyone else would win... All we need to do is throw some lawyers in the mix...

How about this one: PETA versus the Planet of the Apes

The .50 caliber barret sniper rifle is the ideal tool for killing T-Rexes...

Just in case cloning research gets out of hand... we have a backup plan...

I agree that animal rights militants are completely oblivious to the damage they do to other human beings... I don't think it even crosses their mind...

I'd love to be a lawyer who defends obviously guilty animal rights militants (basically terrorists)... if I win; then I'm an excellent lawyer... if I lose; then a guy who torched a cancer research lab will go to jail for twenty years... and that's good too...

I've always been fascinated by people whose narcissism is so extreme... they think they're morally superior to people who work at a bank or in a school... activists are particularly bad about this...

So are celebrities... something about the turf...

I've always been fascinated by people who are so convinced they're morally superior to guys like you, me and the mailman... we don't even enter into their worldview...

Of course once you think that way it's only a matter of degree before you crash planes into buildings...