Silvervarg wrote:
O for God's sake, they never sak where it was, they asked if they'd support an invasion just because someone told them it was a threat to the US...
So? They were cherry-picking the responses anyways, and in regions where there is widespread unconditional support for Bush.
Quote:
Mayby that's because the human nature, not the system? And how about the upsides with democracy?
If a system relies on human nature to be different than it is, it is useless. And there are theoretical problems with democracy that transcend the difficulties of implementation. Upsides? OK, list them.
Quote:
Quote:
And how do you propose to bring humanity "up to snuff?" Like communism and anarchism, any political ideology that requires a change in human nature is doomed to failure. You have to work with the people you have, not the people you'd like to have. You can not just change humanity at a whim to better fit your ideal world.
Schools...?
That doesn't tend to work. You can instill people with a given ideology in schools, but you can't make them independent critical thinkers.
Quote:
And dictators has worked reeeeally well in modern days, just look at Stalin/Hitler/(insert whatever name you'd like here). The major problem is that when you have a dictator, you don't get rid of him/her until they die.
Monarchy ≠ dictatorship. And I will note that it was a democratic system which produced Hitler for us. He was massively popular in Germany, even among non-Nazis. Stalin used more political maneuvering to defeat his high-level rivals, but he also was extremely popular among the general public and would almost certainly have won a direct election in the Soviet Union.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH