Any Other Abortion Clinic Protesters Here?

Post Reply New Topic

So, you cry, b***h and moan about an unborn life being lost. And it's not even in the circumstance where you would be justified in doing so, for example a miscarriage or such. You're putting words into the mouths of something which has yet to form a single opinion, and only for your own feeling of self-righteousness.

That fetus hasn't lived yet, hasn't opened Pandora's box and experienced all the s**t that comes from it. Who are you to give any opinion in it's defense? I've been saying, "I think, therefore, I am" for a reason. It's not like that child will be born into some garden of f*****g eden, it's not like that child will even be born into a life of mediocrity.

It has no will of it's own, IT'S NOT ALIVE. Boo-effing-hoo, to the ones that were declined such a life, as if it were great, because it's not. Life is hard, very hard, so don't jump on your high horse and simply claim they all should live, for maybe in the end if they could remember where they were, they'd scoff at the idea of life on earth.

There is no answer to this subject, it's ret*d to think you'd have one. A fetus hasn't lived yet, so it cannot die. Abortion is akin to condoms and birth control, preventing a life before it has started. And life is not just mere physical form, it is thought, it is emotion, it is feeling.

God, please, take up some other interest. You cannot win here, I cannot win here, just leave it alone. It is up to the parents and the parents alone, to decide what is right for their unborn.

I'm a mass-murderer - I kill billions of sperm every day.

This is not a good topic, on this forum, it looks like JakeWilson, is just trolling for people who don't share his views, there is always going to a huge amount of disagreement from both side of this issue, and a couple of young christian, and most likely virgin men, who have never been with a women, have absolutely no authority on this subject. It a womens choice, get over it,

Pro-choice, but not comfortable with some late term procedures. Until the fetus is able to survive outside the womb, it does not qualify as 'life' to me.


M.

Pro-Life... Blah blah blah
Pro-Choice... Blah blah blah

I find it telling that neither side uses the word abortion when describing themselfs. Why is that?

Personally I don't have a clue when life stops or starts. I have a few personal issues with abortion however which invalidates my oppionion. I'd just love to see people say Pro or Anti Abortion, (and I kinda like Retro-Abortion). Know that it's been around for a LONG time. What has happened is it's become relitively safe. (for the mother anyhow)

Fair enough as an opinion, but those don't really fit my beliefs. I believe that it is up to the prospective parents to decide, not a church, not the government, and certainly not me. In my eyes, attempting to preach abstinence is a fool's errand - some will listen, but most will continue to experiment as they mature and develop. Would I prefer the use of birth control over abortion? Sure, but it isn't 100% effective. So I am in favor of people having the option to abort if that is their desire, thus... pro-choice.


M.

I am actually pro-choice, but I do not like abortion itself. I simply think that women should have the option of abortion, you can be pro-life all you want and support fetal rights all you want, but the concept (of fetal rights) seems too broad to me. There have been cases of court-ordered caesarean sections (in one case, a woman was critically ill and objected to a caesarean because she knew it was not likely that she would survive, but an emergency hearing was held to determine the fetus' rights and the order was granted. After it was done, the baby only lived for two hours, and the Mother died 2 days later, with the c-section listed as a factor in her death.), blood tranfusions, detention of pregnant women specifically because they wanted to give birth at home, etc. etc. etc. So, if fetuses are granted full rights under the law, will it really mean they have the same rights as the mother-to-be, or will they have rights that are superior to hers? Women do not give up their right to bodily autonomy or to make their own decisions about what medical treatments they do and do not get when they become pregnant, if they did under fetal rights laws, it would undermine their legal status and send the message that women are only good for mothering. Which would you rather have, pregnant women's bodily integrity/informed consent rights violated, and the fetus' rights being more important than her rights or her being free to make her own decisions? Take your pick (sorry if I sound bitter).

To the creator of this post I too have a life obession but with an opposite ideology. I can think of a million of reasons why abortions shouldn't be a legal but a medical matter. Maybe the ambiguity of life is at fault for the absurdity of the obession.

I also don't think planned parenthood should get such a bad rap. There would be even more abortions in the US if they didn't exist considering they give out free condoms along with cheap birth control prescriptions.

Also for all the anti abortionists out their what is the logic of your position? If abortion was made illegal how would that change anything ? The only thing I could see happening is that poor women will be in even poorer health and rich women would have their abortions anyway.

Abortion should be allowed and encouraged in the first 3 months of pregnancy and banned after that. 'Clinics' that would do genetic profiles before those 3 months should be banned.

Religion is very status quo.

Ok then, if you want to allow abortion at any time, just ban the genetic profiling doctors, or ban abortion after receiving the profiling result or something like that.