Page 3 of 6 [ 86 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

01 May 2011, 12:04 pm

Lefebvre wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
think about it. Prior to being transformed into a princess and a duchess, the gorgeous Kate was a -commoner-.

Why did a bright beautiful woman like that mate with a Windsor. The Windsor family had the intelligence bred out of them four generations ago.

ruveyn


Ruveyn is getting anti German again.


I don't think Anti-Germanism has anything to do with this. Excessive inbreeding in any ethnic group results in Royal Dumbarse-itude.


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,682
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

01 May 2011, 12:06 pm

Master_Pedant wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
Yes i think most people objections to yesterdays wedding that is that it was overly blue collar event. :roll:

Its perhaps the world's most renowned welfare family. I'm sure lots of people wish state aid worked like that for them.


And yet some of them just want more and more:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 88179.html

Hahaha, it really does work the same way. If its not heat for the palace its big screen TV's on top of the government cheese and Koolaid.

Guess we're really all self-actualizers whether we've financially earned it or not. That's part of why I'm really against hand-outs for those who could work for a living.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

01 May 2011, 12:10 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Lefebvre wrote:
And why did he marry a lower class silly woman?


How is Kate Middleton a "working class" girl? She's never really had to work to make ends meet in her adult life and has only had incredibly short-lasting jobs. Like Donald Trump, she is the heir of Rags to Riches, not Rags to Riches herself.


think about it. Prior to being transformed into a princess and a duchess, the gorgeous Kate was a -commoner-.

Why did a bright beautiful woman like that mate with a Windsor. The Windsor family had the intelligence bred out of them four generations ago.

ruveyn


Yes. What the OP calls "breeding" is really INbreeding.
The crowned heads of Europe could only marry fellow royals. After a few centuries european royalty became the genetic equivalent of an isolated Appalachian village. So todays royals are all as inbred as that funky looking kid who played the banjo in the movie "Deliverence" (an ironic similarity between eurotrash and american whitetrash).So the Windsors need all of the genetic help they can get from commoners.



cdfox7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,700

01 May 2011, 12:10 pm

Tequila wrote:
cdfox7 wrote:
England's national football team not Britian's has theres no GB football team.
You know f**k all about football!! !


True - there are four football teams in the UK, each for one of the Home Nations: England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.


National teams now my good sir, personally I put club before country when it comes to football :wink:



Lefebvre
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 79

01 May 2011, 12:24 pm

cdfox7 wrote:
Tequila wrote:
cdfox7 wrote:
England's national football team not Britian's has theres no GB football team.
You know f**k all about football!! !


True - there are four football teams in the UK, each for one of the Home Nations: England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.


National teams now my good sir, personally I put club before country when it comes to football :wink:


Didnt E. John own Watford? Don't think the fans were too pleased....

The Germans beat us every two years in our national sport, but we beat them twice a century in their national sport, Maggie Thatcher once said.



Lefebvre
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 79

01 May 2011, 12:28 pm

Btw, are you Liverpool or Everton?



cdfox7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,700

01 May 2011, 12:29 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
Yes. What the OP calls "breeding" is really INbreeding.
The crowned heads of Europe could only marry fellow royals. After a few centuries european royalty became the genetic equivalent of an isolated Appalachian village. So todays royals are all as inbred as that funky looking kid who played the banjo in the movie "Deliverence" (an ironic similarity between eurotrash and american whitetrash).So the Windsors need all of the genetic help they can get from commoners.


Yep that how Queen Victoria eared the nickname of "the grandmother of Europe" The OP needs to understand that House of Windsor was formerly know as the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, George V changed the family name back in 1917.



cdfox7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,700

01 May 2011, 12:31 pm

Lefebvre wrote:
Btw, are you Liverpool or Everton?


Now would a blueshite (Evertonan) have a Bill Shanlky quote for a sig?



Lefebvre
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 79

01 May 2011, 12:35 pm

cdfox7 wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Yes. What the OP calls "breeding" is really INbreeding.
The crowned heads of Europe could only marry fellow royals. After a few centuries european royalty became the genetic equivalent of an isolated Appalachian village. So todays royals are all as inbred as that funky looking kid who played the banjo in the movie "Deliverence" (an ironic similarity between eurotrash and american whitetrash).So the Windsors need all of the genetic help they can get from commoners.


Yep that how Queen Victoria eared the nickname of "the grandmother of Europe" The OP needs to understand that House of Windsor was formerly know as the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, George V changed the family name back in 1917.


I wrote about it ten posts ago or something.



cdfox7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,700

01 May 2011, 12:40 pm

Lefebvre wrote:

Didnt E. John own Watford? Don't think the fans were too pleased....

The Germans beat us every two years in our national sport, but we beat them twice a century in their national sport, Maggie Thatcher once said.


MMM first of all by saying that you stating your English! So are you calling yourself vulgar, or don't you consider yourself to be English then?

Elton John is a Watford fan he was a majority shareholder, he still go shares in the club.
Are you forgetting, Alan Sugar & Spurs now? :?



Lefebvre
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 79

01 May 2011, 1:25 pm

No, I am from the continent.



just_ben
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 399
Location: That would be an ecumenical matter!

01 May 2011, 5:28 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Simonono wrote:
Yes, why are we so f***ing vulgar? I have no f***ing idea! I want to f***ing know! :lol:

Perhaps one of these day's there will be a chav on the throne, the royal wedding could be a big-name who's who list of Grime producers. It'd be a bit like a royal UK version of the Source awards :).



Lady Sovereign and Prince Harry 4eva :heart:


_________________
I stand alone on the cliffs of the world.


all_white
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Mar 2011
Age: 23
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,142
Location: Scotland

01 May 2011, 5:55 pm

Lefebvre wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
Define vulgar.


Common.


*waits for emuman100 to read this quote and share a private joke*

:P



cdfox7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,700

01 May 2011, 5:58 pm

This is the common royal family :lol:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6FU0cgg9ko&feature=fvwrel[/youtube]



blunnet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,053

01 May 2011, 6:11 pm

Simonono wrote:
Yes, why are we so f***ing vulgar? I have no f***ing idea! I want to f***ing know! :lol:

lol, I first thought that was what the OP meant when reading the title.



Chronos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,698

02 May 2011, 2:09 am

Lefebvre wrote:
The English were famous for their breeding, upper class, stiff upper lip.
But who were at Williams wedding: Beckham (a football player), E. John (idiot poof and popsinger), other riff raff. And why did he marry a lower class silly woman?

What's the matter with the English??


I have news for you. They've always been "vulgar". You've been mislead by the fact that English society has, until recently, always been represented by the upper class in the media. Look up "poverty in Victorian England". Those dirt caked people in rags are the people that most of the English population descends from. Not that they were bad people, just poor. English society used to be highly class stratified to the extent that there were laws governing what types of clothes and colors one could wear depending on their class. Today, "classism" in England is akin to racism in the US. There used to be an English show that used to touch on class stratification in England called "Keeping Up Appearances". The main character, Hyacinth lives in an white collar neighborhood and ius quite concerned with appearances and social status. However she comes from a poor, working class family, and the living situation and culture of her sisters is quite different from that of her own.