Agenda 21 United Nations - George Soros

Post Reply New Topic

Anyone else know about this?

Type in your city's name then ICLEI

It's apart of the new world order. I'm serious. This isn't a joke anymore

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzEEgtOFFlM[/youtube]

I have heard this rhetoric before. Just a bunch of anti-environmental regressive loons.

Btw, I am not calling you a loon, specifically.

Also, I lie the idea of a new world order. In an ideal society from my point of view, science would be greatly supported. Human cloning would be done, advances in the field of ectogenesis would work to eliminate natural motherhood. We aspies would have our rights along with everybody else, etc.

A world dominated by scientism and a strong reverence for morality/ethics is my ideal...


And I hope one day it becomes manifest...

Looks like a bunch of nuts.

So when do you plan on revolutionizing the world towards your ideal?

I won't be able to do it myself, duh.


But as long as I contribute my ideas and put them out in the open, I will be among the people potentially pushing for change...

I agree, and the pictures of the all seeing eye-pyramid thing with a prison inside of it (thus the Freemason/Illuminati connection!! !!!11one) did not help this videos credibility

Soros had his home invaded by nazi's and is a strong supporter of socialism/communism.

http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo ... /natur.htm

They're apparently building Wildlife Cooridors. Which is segregated wild life within an industrialized city.

Does anyone else notice how the word "sustainable" is emphasized constantly in society? Sustainable. Meaning able to sustain efficiently.

Meaning abolish. Get rid of. Get rid of the people who aren't allowed in the bubble.

"Climate change will have significant impacts in British Columbia and the Yukon, including increased flood dangers in some areas, drought in others, and widespread disruption to forests, fisheries and wildlife. Sea levels are expected to rise up to 30 cm on the north coast of British Columbia and up to 50 cm on the north Yukon coast by 2050, mainly due to warmer ocean temperatures. This could cause increased sedimentation, coastal flooding and permanent inundation of some natural ecosystems, and could place low-lying homes, docks and port facilities at risk."

I don't see why "sustainability" in moderation should be vilified, but, taken, for example, to the level of the population recommendation of the "Georgia Guide Stones" and lowering the population of the Earth to 500,000,000 is extreme and insane. Who gets to decide who lives and who doesn't?

Man (humans) are part of nature. If man (humans) exploits the Earth to the point where nature is dying and conditions are "unsustainable", then we bring on our own demise.

Ultimate power corrupts ultimately. I think extreme forms of government are bad.


Many years ago, I read about the Knights Templar, Illuminati, Freemasons, and what connections have been made to more current history. I became fearful and depressed and had to stop researching it.

Of course, fear is a powerful tool. If we allow any group to instill fear of the opposite extreme ideology, we are essentially allowing fear to dictate what we should believe in, and which side has the correct answer. I don't think either extreme is correct - I think it's the middle (like the golden mean) balance that is the answer.

Wildlife corridors are a good idea. I see they also think that "bike paths" are a new world order conspiracy. These people are crazy. This is just an excuse to see environmentalism in good and evil terms. Hint: think evil. Ive listened to christian radio programs that also try to liken environmentalism to an evil conspiracy but they didnt use this specific conspiracy.

This is pap for low brows. It's a way to dismiss a subject they don't want to think about rationally by invoking ridiculous conspiracies.

QFT

That is certainly not what sustainability means. In my work (I am a public servant involved in the sustainability of First Nations' self-government in health and social services), sustainability means the ability for a program to be sustained without the need for increasing demands on public money. Population growth certainly creates new demand for services, but it also creates no economic activity that creates public revenue. The key to sustainability is the ability to balance those off.

The same principle can be applied to any discrete system--public money, energy supply, food supply and so forth. Any economist or engineer can tell you that a closed system will eventually fall to entropy. In an economic context, that's consumption and waste. In an engineering system it's disappation of heat.

You always have to introduce new energy into a system, so the key is to ensure that modifying the system doesn't create a demand for new energy that is disproportionate with the increased output.