Fnord wrote:
More, please? I've been trying for years to articulate my thoughts on this ...
Thank you. What I wrote is a commonly discussed proposition in religious studies. Reliance on gnosis, magic, and divination is an indication that dominant systems of authority are not trusted. Gnosis, magic, and divination shift the center of power from a religious hierarchy, or priesthood, and scriptures to the individual.
A good example is the rise of the bhakti movement in India. Caitanya (1486–1534 A.D.), who become repopularized through the Hare Krishna movement, opposed Vedanta ritual and strict caste divisions. He replaced Vedanta with devotional populism. It became a very successful movement. Both traditional "Hindus" (using the modern term) and Muslims became disciples of Caitanya.
These days, a similar phenomenon is seen with the so-called new age movement. Again, individual experience and gnosis have replaced religious authority structures.
The problem with these anti-establishment movements is their internal contradictions. Without a body of scriptures or a system of priestly succession, a movement will generally disintegrate soon after the death of its founder. The anti-establishment movement has to become institutionalized (or "routinized," as we say in my field) in order to survive.