Julie Bindel strikes again

Page 2 of 2 [ 30 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2

Previous topic | Next topic

Lukeda420
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,640
Location: Chicago suburbs.

16 Aug 2016, 9:52 pm

Well she seems to be successful at trolling. She's certainly got a lot of people riled up.

adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

16 Aug 2016, 10:08 pm

Aye, she's something of a renowned provocateur.

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

17 Aug 2016, 1:14 am

Dox47 wrote:

You folks do realize that she's obviously being sarcastic, right?

We're talking about our fellow Aspies here. So, getting sarcasm? Probably not. It goes over my head much of the time, too.

_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

sephardic-male
Toucan
Toucan

Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 274
Location: Toronto, Canada

17 Aug 2016, 8:21 am

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/com ... _reported/

some reddit posters are reporting Julie to the U.K Police

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/com ... et_police/

_________________
http://theothermccain.com/category/feminism/sex-trouble/

Robert Stacy McCain's sex trouble series

adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

17 Aug 2016, 8:40 am

sephardic-male wrote:

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4y5ew0/transgender_man_here_from_netherlands_i_reported/

some reddit posters are reporting Julie to the U.K Police

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/com ... et_police/

This just elevated itself to the rank of popcorn fodder.

sephardic-male
Toucan
Toucan

Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 274
Location: Toronto, Canada

17 Aug 2016, 8:43 am

adifferentname wrote:

sephardic-male wrote:

This just elevated itself to the rank of popcorn fodder.

next time when you complain and whine about sexist and rapej okes i will show you this thread supporting Julie's voilent anti-male sentiments

_________________
http://theothermccain.com/category/feminism/sex-trouble/

Robert Stacy McCain's sex trouble series

adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

17 Aug 2016, 9:24 am

sephardic-male wrote:

next time when you complain and whine about sexist and rapej okes i will show you this thread supporting Julie's voilent anti-male sentiments

Next time? I don't believe there will ever be a first time. Have you confused me with someone else?

sephardic-male
Toucan
Toucan

Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 274
Location: Toronto, Canada

17 Aug 2016, 2:38 pm

man's career is in danger for disagreeing with the feminist narrative. he did not call for killing women not incite hate against women

http://www.bbc.com/news/business-36935362

meanwhile Julie Bindel who regularly incite anti-male hatred ad male genocide goes unpunished

_________________
http://theothermccain.com/category/feminism/sex-trouble/

Robert Stacy McCain's sex trouble series

alcockell
Raven
Raven

Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 108
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK

20 Aug 2016, 6:48 am

People thought Hitler was trolling when he wrote Mein Kampf....

... until Auschwitz.

Valerie Solanas wrote the SCUM Manifesto, calling for male genocide.. then shot Andy Warhol.
She was lauded for it.

Hopper
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,920
Location: The outskirts

20 Aug 2016, 1:15 pm

The chances of women rounding up all men, putting them in prison, then shooting them is pretty low.

The chances of a woman's life being blighted by sexism is very high. Indeed, the chance of a woman being raped is nothing to be sniffed at.

And I can't believe you made me defend Julie Bindel.

alcockell wrote:

People thought Hitler was trolling when he wrote Mein Kampf....

... until Auschwitz.

What, really?

And I hope you don't mind that in my mind, during those elipses, you pulled off your sunglasses and dropped your voice about half an octave.

Quote:

Valerie Solanas wrote the SCUM Manifesto, calling for male genocide.. then shot Andy Warhol.
She was lauded for it.

f*****g hell.

_________________
Of course, it's probably quite a bit more complicated than that.

You know sometimes, between the dames and the horses, I don't even know why I put my hat on.

adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

20 Aug 2016, 2:44 pm

Hopper wrote:

The chances of women rounding up all men, putting them in prison, then shooting them is pretty low.

Therefore voicing your desire to do so is not contemptible? The chances of an Australian cheese salesman murdering me in my sleep are pretty low, but I most certainly won't be in a charitable mood should one voice their desire to do so. Actus reus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea.

Quote:

The chances of a woman's life being blighted by sexism is very high. Indeed, the chance of a woman being raped is nothing to be sniffed at.

What does that have to do with Julie Bindel's tweet or this thread?

Quote:

And I can't believe you made me defend Julie Bindel.

Wherein you deny yourself agency in a bid to assume victimhood. Bad form!

Hopper
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,920
Location: The outskirts

20 Aug 2016, 3:14 pm

adifferentname wrote:

Hopper wrote:

The chances of women rounding up all men, putting them in prison, then shooting them is pretty low.

Context. I see no such desire voiced. She made a sarcastic, satirical remark. I understand a common feature of us on the spectrum is not picking up on such things, but that doesn't mean there is free reign to impute whatever it is we can be most outraged by into the 'real' meaning of/behind such a remark.

Even if she was sincere in such a thing, I don't see the cause for outrage or cries of hypocrisy, because the comparisons brought up so far simply don't actually compare.

Quote:

The chances of a woman's life being blighted by sexism is very high. Indeed, the chance of a woman being raped is nothing to be sniffed at.

What does that have to do with Julie Bindel's tweet or this thread?

Quoth sephardic-male:

Quote:

next time when you complain and whine about sexist and rapej okes i will show you this thread supporting Julie's voilent anti-male sentiments

Quote:

And I can't believe you made me defend Julie Bindel.

Wherein you deny yourself agency in a bid to assume victimhood. Bad form!

I did no such thing, as well you know. That she is often an annoying idiot in no way excuses other people being silly about things she has said.

_________________
Of course, it's probably quite a bit more complicated than that.

You know sometimes, between the dames and the horses, I don't even know why I put my hat on.

adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

20 Aug 2016, 4:57 pm

Hopper wrote:

Similar claims by Bindel are often dismissed as "sarcastic" or "satirical" only for her to later admit her sincerity. I see no reason to believe this is any different. That said, and with respect to your next comment, we'll take a different tack. What would your opinion be were she talking about e.g. Jewish people.

Quote:

Even if she was sincere in such a thing, I don't see the cause for outrage or cries of hypocrisy, because the comparisons brought up so far simply don't actually compare.

Outrage wouldn't be an unreasonable response, though I'll stick to my default of disdain where Bindel is concerned. As for "hypocrisy", why would that be a necessary component?

Quote:

Quoth sephardic-male:

Quote:

next time when you complain and whine about sexist and rapej okes i will show you this thread supporting Julie's voilent anti-male sentiments

Sephardic-male's comment, likewise, has nothing to do with either the thread or Bindel. That post was, bizarrely, a response to myself. I'm putting it down to tiredness or some other temporary impairment on sephardic's part.

Quote:

And I can't believe you made me defend Julie Bindel.

Wherein you deny yourself agency in a bid to assume victimhood. Bad form!

I did no such thing, as well you know. That she is often an annoying idiot in no way excuses other people being silly about things she has said.

Firstly, yes you did. You very specifically referred to being "made" to defend Bindel, implying that you were the agent of an outside influence. Secondly, that was intended as a bit of light-hearted humour and should be taken as such. Thirdly, doesn't denying the experiences of others by decrying them as "being silly" rather fly in the face of your ideology, or do you make exceptions for the twitterverse?

gingerpickles
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Jan 2016
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 515
Location: USA

20 Aug 2016, 5:34 pm

Lukeda420 wrote:

adifferentname wrote:

Dox47 wrote:

You folks do realize that she's obviously being sarcastic, right?

I wouldn't be so certain. Seems par for the course for Bindel.

Why would she direct it at trolls then? That header kind of screams sarcasm.

Not just trolls tho.."misogynist trolls" which is women hating trolls so basically everyone that is not agree with her and providing her a man hating echo chamber. It is not pure sarcasm, it is baiting and looking for chorus from her followers.
Yuk.
If hating her is hating my own gender then I will proudly wear a shirt saying "Yep. Im a misogynist. Deal with it"

_________________
FFFFF Captchas.

Page 2 of 2 [ 30 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2

Jump to:

Julie Bindel strikes again Post Reply New Topic

Julie Bindel strikes again